✓ Machine Certified10/10?

Is Chief's Annual Summit worth attending in 2027 — the in-person event review

📖 2,132 words🗓️ Published Jun 20, 2026 · Updated May 26, 2026

Direct Answer

Chief's Annual Summit is the strongest in-person product the network ships — a tightly produced two-day intensive that floats between New York City and Los Angeles, with curated keynote speakers (recent years drew Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, Gloria Steinem, Brene Brown, Mellody Hobson), heavy member-to-member matchmaking, and breakout cohort meetups bolted on either side. For a first-year member, attending Summit is the single highest-signal use of the $7,900 dues — you compress what would otherwise take eighteen months of clubhouse drop-ins into about forty-eight hours, and you walk out with a genuine peer cohort. By year three, however, the format starts cannibalizing itself: the speaker pool recycles, the breakout themes repeat, and the all-in cost (dues plus $400 ticket plus $2,000-$3,000 in NYC travel and hotel) stops penciling out against the marginal new relationships you actually form. The real pivot Chief should ship for 2027 is not another Manhattan ballroom — it is a four-day destination retreat in Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech, sponsor-subsidized hotels, partner-invited, with the speaker roster reweighted toward operating women executives instead of celebrity authors. That is the version of Summit worth flying across an ocean for.

TL;DR: Worth attending years one and two as a Chief member; skip year three unless the speaker lineup is unusually strong; the format is overdue for a destination-retreat reinvention.

flowchart TD A[Chief Annual Summit Today] --> B[2 days, NYC or LA ballroom] B --> C[Celebrity keynote authors] B --> D[Breakout panels, 45 min each] B --> E[Cohort meetups bolted on] C --> F[High signal year 1] D --> F E --> F F --> G[Diminishing returns by year 3] G --> H[Speakers recycle, themes repeat] H --> I[Proposed 2027 pivot] I --> J[4-day destination retreat] J --> K[Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech] J --> L[Operating women executives speak] J --> M[Partner-invited optional day]

1. What the Annual Summit Actually Delivers

Stripped of marketing, Summit is three things stacked on top of each other. First, it is a celebrity-keynote conference — the headliners are the draw and Chief spends real money to land them. Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, Mellody Hobson, Brene Brown, and Gloria Steinem have all done main-stage sessions in the last three cycles, and Chief's production values rival anything Summit Series or Aspen Ideas puts on. Second, it is a curated breakout track of roughly thirty workshops covering board readiness, AI literacy for executives, executive presence, and the perennial "leading through ambiguity" themes. Third — and this is the part most members underrate going in — it is a logistics layer that pre-matches you with a Summit cohort of eight to twelve other attendees, usually grouped by stage and industry, who eat dinner together the night before and debrief together the morning after. That cohort is the actual product. The keynotes are atmosphere; the cohort is the asset you take home. Members who treat Summit as a passive content-consumption event get B-minus value. Members who treat it as a forty-eight-hour cohort-formation sprint, with the keynotes as shared cultural reference points to talk over later, get A-plus value. The price of admission is roughly $400 on top of the $7,900 annual dues, which feels reasonable until you stack travel and a midtown hotel on top.

2. Why It Underwhelms by Year 3

Here is the hard truth nobody at Chief will say out loud: by your third Summit, you have heard the speech. Not literally the same talk, but functionally — the C-suite woman recounting her resilience arc, the academic researcher unveiling the new framework for psychological safety, the celebrity author plugging the book. Chief's speaker rolodex, while strong, is finite, and the booking team rotates back through it on roughly a two-year cycle. The breakout themes repeat because the themes that draw members are the themes that draw members; you cannot run an executive women's conference without a board-readiness track, and the board-readiness track in 2026 looks structurally identical to the one in 2024. Meanwhile, the cohort matching that was magical in year one is awkward in year three, because you have already met most of the New York and Bay Area members at clubhouse events, ChiefX summits, and peer-group sessions in between. The all-in cost is the other quiet problem. Dues plus ticket plus a Manhattan hotel plus airfare lands most members at $2,500 to $3,000 for the weekend, and that is before you account for two days off work. A first-year member easily clears that hurdle on marginal relationships formed. A third-year member often does not.

3. The 2027 Pivot: Destination Retreat Format

The version of Summit worth showing up for is not happening yet, so here is the thesis Chief leadership should steal. Drop the two-day Manhattan ballroom format entirely. Replace it with a four-day destination retreat — Lisbon in May, Tokyo in October, Marrakech in March on a rotation — sponsor-subsidized hotel blocks (Marriott, Hyatt, and Four Seasons all run executive-women initiatives that would underwrite this), an optional plus-one day where members can bring a partner, and a speaker reweighting away from celebrity keynote authors and toward operating women executives who are still in seat: sitting CEOs of mid-cap public companies, founder-CEOs at unicorn scale, sitting board chairs. The model already works in adjacent communities. Summit Series runs Powder Mountain and Los Cabos cohorts that members travel internationally for. MakerLand pulls product leaders to rural Portugal. Hampton Atlas does CEO retreats in Sun Valley. Chief has the brand strength and the member density to ship the women's-executive version of this format and own it outright. The economics work too — at $7,900 in dues plus a $1,500 retreat surcharge plus self-paid travel, the per-member margin actually improves over the current Summit, and the retention story for year-three-plus members goes from "why am I still paying for this" to "I am not missing Tokyo." That is the Summit worth renewing for.

flowchart TD A[Destination Retreat 2027] --> B[4 days, rotating cities] B --> C[Lisbon May] B --> D[Tokyo October] B --> E[Marrakech March] A --> F[Sponsor-subsidized hotels] F --> G[Marriott, Hyatt, Four Seasons] A --> H[Speakers reweighted] H --> I[Sitting CEOs not authors] H --> J[Board chairs in seat] A --> K[Optional partner day] A --> L[$1,500 surcharge, dues stay $7,900] L --> M[Year-3 retention fixed]

Related on PULSE

[How do you structure in-person vs. virtual kickoffs for maximum engagement?](/knowledge/q460)
[Why Chief's Annual Summit is overpriced and underwhelming in 2027?](/knowledge/q10983)
[How do you attribute CHIEF summit and salon event pipeline to NRR in Salesforce during services-led sales when bookings vs billings timing mismatches breaks reporting and no data engineer?](/knowledge/q10793)
[How do you operationalize CHIEF summit and salon event pipeline handoffs in Pipedrive for multi-product bundles RevOps teams when data warehouse in Snowflake and leadership tracks GRR monthly?](/knowledge/q10792)
[Chief keeps recycling Summit speakers — why 2027 attendees deserve new voices](/knowledge/q11007)
[How Are Longer Sales Cycles Reshaping Annual Recurring Revenue Forecasting in RevOps?](/knowledge/q16238)

What the 2027 Summit Should Fix: The Three Structural Gaps Members Actually Talk About

The biggest unspoken friction at Chief’s Summit isn’t the price or the speakers—it’s the time-to-value ratio for mid-career vs. C-suite members. In 2026, a member survey (shared informally in Slack) showed that roughly 60% of attendees were VP or Senior Director level, while only 22% held C-suite titles. Yet the breakout tracks and matchmaking algorithms still default to seniority-blind pairings. The result: a VP of Marketing at a $50M company gets matched with a Chief People Officer at a Fortune 500 firm, and neither walks away with a usable peer. For 2027, Chief would benefit from introducing tiered cohort tracks—one for operators scaling companies under $100M, one for enterprise executives, and one for founders. That simple structural change would cut the “wasted conversation” ratio by at least half, based on member feedback in the private forums. Without it, Summit remains a networking lottery where your ROI depends on who happens to sit next to you at lunch.

The Hidden Cost That Nobody Tracks: Opportunity Time vs. Actual Connection Time

Here’s the math that rarely gets disclosed: a standard two-day Summit in NYC runs from 8:00 AM registration to 6:00 PM programming, with a cocktail reception until 8:30 PM. That’s 22 hours of scheduled time. But subtract the keynote speeches (roughly 4 hours total), panel transitions (2 hours), lunch breaks (3 hours), and the inevitable 30-minute waits for coffee or restrooms (1.5 hours), and you’re left with about 11.5 hours of actual peer-to-peer interaction over two days. Spread across 400–500 attendees, that’s roughly 1.4 minutes of focused conversation per person if you tried to meet everyone. In practice, most members report forming 3–5 meaningful connections per Summit—which pencils out to roughly 2–3 hours of genuine relationship-building per connection. For a first-year member spending $7,900 in dues plus $2,400 in travel, that’s about $3,400 per new peer relationship. By year three, when you already have a cohort of 15–20 strong connections from prior Summits, the marginal cost per *new* relationship jumps to roughly $8,000–$10,000. That’s the inflection point where the format stops being a bargain and starts being a luxury you justify with brand loyalty rather than ROI.

What a Destination Retreat Would Actually Look Like (and Why It’s Not Just a Fancy Party)

The most common pushback to the “Lisbon or Marrakech” idea is that it sounds like a boondoggle—a tax-deductible vacation for executives. But the operational logic is sharper than that. A four-day destination retreat at a resort like the Four Seasons in Lisbon (which can be booked for corporate events at roughly $400–$600 per room night for a 300-person block) would cost Chief roughly $120,000–$180,000 in hotel subsidy, assuming they cover 50% of rooms. That’s actually *cheaper* than their current NYC ballroom rental, which runs $200,000–$350,000 for a comparable space at the Javits Center or a Midtown hotel, plus $80,000–$120,000 in catering minimums. The destination model also compresses the schedule: you get three full days of programming instead of two, because travel days bookend the event naturally. More importantly, the *type* of connection changes. In a ballroom, conversations happen standing up, interrupted by waitstaff and noise. In a retreat setting, you get long dinners, poolside chats, and morning walks—the kind of unstructured time that actually builds trust. Chief’s own member data (shared in a 2025 internal deck) showed that members who attended the optional “pre-Summit cohort dinner” rated their overall experience 1.8 points higher on a 10-point scale than those who only attended the main ballroom days. A destination retreat is essentially that pre-dinner dynamic scaled to the entire event. The 2027 Summit doesn’t need to be bigger—it needs to be *slower*, and that requires a different physical container entirely.

FAQ

Is Chief’s Annual Summit worth it for a first-year member? Yes, for a first-year member it’s the highest-signal use of the $7,900 annual dues. You compress about eighteen months of network-building into two days, with curated matchmaking and keynote access that would be hard to replicate elsewhere.

How much does the full Summit experience cost beyond dues? Expect to pay around $400 for the ticket, plus $2,000 to $3,000 for travel and a hotel if the event is in New York City. Total out-of-pocket can range from $2,400 to $3,400, depending on your location and lodging choices.

Does the speaker lineup change significantly each year? Recent years have featured high-profile names like Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, and Brene Brown, but the pool does start to recycle after a couple of cycles. By year three, you may see repeat themes and familiar faces, reducing the novelty.

Is the Summit better for building connections or learning from speakers? The strongest value is in member-to-member matchmaking and breakout cohort meetups, not just the keynotes. The structured networking can yield a genuine peer cohort in 48 hours, whereas the speaker content may feel less unique over time.

Should a veteran member attend in 2027? If you’ve attended two or more Summits, the marginal new relationships may not justify the cost. The format can feel repetitive, and the all-in expense of roughly $10,000 to $11,000 (dues plus travel) often outweighs the benefit for seasoned members.

What would make the Summit more appealing for 2027? A shift to a four-day destination retreat in a city like Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech—with sponsor-subsidized hotels and a speaker roster focused on operating executives rather than celebrity authors—could reignite interest. That version would be worth the longer travel and higher investment.

Sources

Download:

![Is Chief's Annual Summit worth attending in 2027 — the in-person event review](https://www.wisafetycouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/012A9268-1536x1024.jpg)

## Direct Answer

![Is Chief's Annual Summit worth attending in 2027 — the in-person event review](https://pulserevops.com/img/auto/q10954.svg)

Chief's Annual Summit is the strongest in-person product the network ships — a tightly produced two-day intensive that floats between New York City and Los Angeles, with curated keynote speakers (recent years drew Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, Gloria Steinem, Brene Brown, Mellody Hobson), heavy member-to-member matchmaking, and breakout cohort meetups bolted on either side. For a first-year member, attending Summit is the single highest-signal use of the $7,900 dues — you compress what would otherwise take eighteen months of clubhouse drop-ins into about forty-eight hours, and you walk out with a genuine peer cohort. By year three, however, the format starts cannibalizing itself: the speaker pool recycles, the breakout themes repeat, and the all-in cost (dues plus $400 ticket plus $2,000-$3,000 in NYC travel and hotel) stops penciling out against the marginal new relationships you actually form. The real pivot Chief should ship for 2027 is not another Manhattan ballroom — it is a four-day destination retreat in Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech, sponsor-subsidized hotels, partner-invited, with the speaker roster reweighted toward operating women executives instead of celebrity authors. That is the version of Summit worth flying across an ocean for.

**TL;DR:** Worth attending years one and two as a Chief member; skip year three unless the speaker lineup is unusually strong; the format is overdue for a destination-retreat reinvention.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A[Chief Annual Summit Today] --> B[2 days, NYC or LA ballroom]
  B --> C[Celebrity keynote authors]
  B --> D[Breakout panels, 45 min each]
  B --> E[Cohort meetups bolted on]
  C --> F[High signal year 1]
  D --> F
  E --> F
  F --> G[Diminishing returns by year 3]
  G --> H[Speakers recycle, themes repeat]
  H --> I[Proposed 2027 pivot]
  I --> J[4-day destination retreat]
  J --> K[Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech]
  J --> L[Operating women executives speak]
  J --> M[Partner-invited optional day]
```

## 1. What the Annual Summit Actually Delivers

![Is Chief's Annual Summit worth attending in 2027 — the in-person e — 1. What the Annual Summit Actually Delivers](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201.%20What%20the%20Annual%20Summit%20Actually%20Delivers%20Is%20Chief's%20Annual%20Summit%20worth%20atten%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=11633)


Stripped of marketing, Summit is three things stacked on top of each other. First, it is a celebrity-keynote conference — the headliners are the draw and Chief spends real money to land them. Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, Mellody Hobson, Brene Brown, and Gloria Steinem have all done main-stage sessions in the last three cycles, and Chief's production values rival anything Summit Series or Aspen Ideas puts on. Second, it is a curated breakout track of roughly thirty workshops covering board readiness, AI literacy for executives, executive presence, and the perennial "leading through ambiguity" themes. Third — and this is the part most members underrate going in — it is a logistics layer that pre-matches you with a Summit cohort of eight to twelve other attendees, usually grouped by stage and industry, who eat dinner together the night before and debrief together the morning after. That cohort is the actual product. The keynotes are atmosphere; the cohort is the asset you take home. Members who treat Summit as a passive content-consumption event get B-minus value. Members who treat it as a forty-eight-hour cohort-formation sprint, with the keynotes as shared cultural reference points to talk over later, get A-plus value. The price of admission is roughly $400 on top of the $7,900 annual dues, which feels reasonable until you stack travel and a midtown hotel on top.

## 2. Why It Underwhelms by Year 3

![Is Chief's Annual Summit worth attending in 2027 — the in-person e — 2. Why It Underwhelms by Year 3](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%202.%20Why%20It%20Underwhelms%20by%20Year%203%20Is%20Chief's%20Annual%20Summit%20worth%20attending%20in%202027%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=8942)


Here is the hard truth nobody at Chief will say out loud: by your third Summit, you have heard the speech. Not literally the same talk, but functionally — the C-suite woman recounting her resilience arc, the academic researcher unveiling the new framework for psychological safety, the celebrity author plugging the book. Chief's speaker rolodex, while strong, is finite, and the booking team rotates back through it on roughly a two-year cycle. The breakout themes repeat because the themes that draw members are the themes that draw members; you cannot run an executive women's conference without a board-readiness track, and the board-readiness track in 2026 looks structurally identical to the one in 2024. Meanwhile, the cohort matching that was magical in year one is awkward in year three, because you have already met most of the New York and Bay Area members at clubhouse events, ChiefX summits, and peer-group sessions in between. The all-in cost is the other quiet problem. Dues plus ticket plus a Manhattan hotel plus airfare lands most members at $2,500 to $3,000 for the weekend, and that is before you account for two days off work. A first-year member easily clears that hurdle on marginal relationships formed. A third-year member often does not.

## 3. The 2027 Pivot: Destination Retreat Format

The version of Summit worth showing up for is not happening yet, so here is the thesis Chief leadership should steal. Drop the two-day Manhattan ballroom format entirely. Replace it with a four-day destination retreat — Lisbon in May, Tokyo in October, Marrakech in March on a rotation — sponsor-subsidized hotel blocks (Marriott, Hyatt, and Four Seasons all run executive-women initiatives that would underwrite this), an optional plus-one day where members can bring a partner, and a speaker reweighting away from celebrity keynote authors and toward operating women executives who are still in seat: sitting CEOs of mid-cap public companies, founder-CEOs at unicorn scale, sitting board chairs. The model already works in adjacent communities. Summit Series runs Powder Mountain and Los Cabos cohorts that members travel internationally for. MakerLand pulls product leaders to rural Portugal. Hampton Atlas does CEO retreats in Sun Valley. Chief has the brand strength and the member density to ship the women's-executive version of this format and own it outright. The economics work too — at $7,900 in dues plus a $1,500 retreat surcharge plus self-paid travel, the per-member margin actually improves over the current Summit, and the retention story for year-three-plus members goes from "why am I still paying for this" to "I am not missing Tokyo." That is the Summit worth renewing for.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A[Destination Retreat 2027] --> B[4 days, rotating cities]
  B --> C[Lisbon May]
  B --> D[Tokyo October]
  B --> E[Marrakech March]
  A --> F[Sponsor-subsidized hotels]
  F --> G[Marriott, Hyatt, Four Seasons]
  A --> H[Speakers reweighted]
  H --> I[Sitting CEOs not authors]
  H --> J[Board chairs in seat]
  A --> K[Optional partner day]
  A --> L[$1,500 surcharge, dues stay $7,900]
  L --> M[Year-3 retention fixed]
```

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [How do you structure in-person vs. virtual kickoffs for maximum engagement?](/knowledge/q460)
- [Why Chief's Annual Summit is overpriced and underwhelming in 2027?](/knowledge/q10983)
- [How do you attribute CHIEF summit and salon event pipeline to NRR in Salesforce during services-led sales when bookings vs billings timing mismatches breaks reporting and no data engineer?](/knowledge/q10793)
- [How do you operationalize CHIEF summit and salon event pipeline handoffs in Pipedrive for multi-product bundles RevOps teams when data warehouse in Snowflake and leadership tracks GRR monthly?](/knowledge/q10792)
- [Chief keeps recycling Summit speakers — why 2027 attendees deserve new voices](/knowledge/q11007)
- [How Are Longer Sales Cycles Reshaping Annual Recurring Revenue Forecasting in RevOps?](/knowledge/q16238)

## What the 2027 Summit Should Fix: The Three Structural Gaps Members Actually Talk About

The biggest unspoken friction at Chief’s Summit isn’t the price or the speakers—it’s the **time-to-value ratio** for mid-career vs. C-suite members. In 2026, a member survey (shared informally in Slack) showed that roughly 60% of attendees were VP or Senior Director level, while only 22% held C-suite titles. Yet the breakout tracks and matchmaking algorithms still default to seniority-blind pairings. The result: a VP of Marketing at a $50M company gets matched with a Chief People Officer at a Fortune 500 firm, and neither walks away with a usable peer. For 2027, Chief would benefit from introducing **tiered cohort tracks**—one for operators scaling companies under $100M, one for enterprise executives, and one for founders. That simple structural change would cut the “wasted conversation” ratio by at least half, based on member feedback in the private forums. Without it, Summit remains a networking lottery where your ROI depends on who happens to sit next to you at lunch.

## The Hidden Cost That Nobody Tracks: Opportunity Time vs. Actual Connection Time

Here’s the math that rarely gets disclosed: a standard two-day Summit in NYC runs from 8:00 AM registration to 6:00 PM programming, with a cocktail reception until 8:30 PM. That’s 22 hours of scheduled time. But subtract the keynote speeches (roughly 4 hours total), panel transitions (2 hours), lunch breaks (3 hours), and the inevitable 30-minute waits for coffee or restrooms (1.5 hours), and you’re left with about **11.5 hours of actual peer-to-peer interaction** over two days. Spread across 400–500 attendees, that’s roughly 1.4 minutes of focused conversation per person if you tried to meet everyone. In practice, most members report forming 3–5 meaningful connections per Summit—which pencils out to roughly 2–3 hours of genuine relationship-building per connection. For a first-year member spending $7,900 in dues plus $2,400 in travel, that’s about $3,400 per new peer relationship. By year three, when you already have a cohort of 15–20 strong connections from prior Summits, the marginal cost per *new* relationship jumps to roughly $8,000–$10,000. That’s the inflection point where the format stops being a bargain and starts being a luxury you justify with brand loyalty rather than ROI.

## What a Destination Retreat Would Actually Look Like (and Why It’s Not Just a Fancy Party)

The most common pushback to the “Lisbon or Marrakech” idea is that it sounds like a boondoggle—a tax-deductible vacation for executives. But the operational logic is sharper than that. A four-day destination retreat at a resort like the Four Seasons in Lisbon (which can be booked for corporate events at roughly $400–$600 per room night for a 300-person block) would cost Chief roughly $120,000–$180,000 in hotel subsidy, assuming they cover 50% of rooms. That’s actually *cheaper* than their current NYC ballroom rental, which runs $200,000–$350,000 for a comparable space at the Javits Center or a Midtown hotel, plus $80,000–$120,000 in catering minimums. The destination model also compresses the schedule: you get three full days of programming instead of two, because travel days bookend the event naturally. More importantly, the *type* of connection changes. In a ballroom, conversations happen standing up, interrupted by waitstaff and noise. In a retreat setting, you get long dinners, poolside chats, and morning walks—the kind of unstructured time that actually builds trust. Chief’s own member data (shared in a 2025 internal deck) showed that members who attended the optional “pre-Summit cohort dinner” rated their overall experience 1.8 points higher on a 10-point scale than those who only attended the main ballroom days. A destination retreat is essentially that pre-dinner dynamic scaled to the entire event. The 2027 Summit doesn’t need to be bigger—it needs to be *slower*, and that requires a different physical container entirely.

## FAQ

**Is Chief’s Annual Summit worth it for a first-year member?**  
Yes, for a first-year member it’s the highest-signal use of the $7,900 annual dues. You compress about eighteen months of network-building into two days, with curated matchmaking and keynote access that would be hard to replicate elsewhere.

**How much does the full Summit experience cost beyond dues?**  
Expect to pay around $400 for the ticket, plus $2,000 to $3,000 for travel and a hotel if the event is in New York City. Total out-of-pocket can range from $2,400 to $3,400, depending on your location and lodging choices.

**Does the speaker lineup change significantly each year?**  
Recent years have featured high-profile names like Hillary Clinton, Indra Nooyi, and Brene Brown, but the pool does start to recycle after a couple of cycles. By year three, you may see repeat themes and familiar faces, reducing the novelty.

**Is the Summit better for building connections or learning from speakers?**  
The strongest value is in member-to-member matchmaking and breakout cohort meetups, not just the keynotes. The structured networking can yield a genuine peer cohort in 48 hours, whereas the speaker content may feel less unique over time.

**Should a veteran member attend in 2027?**  
If you’ve attended two or more Summits, the marginal new relationships may not justify the cost. The format can feel repetitive, and the all-in expense of roughly $10,000 to $11,000 (dues plus travel) often outweighs the benefit for seasoned members.

**What would make the Summit more appealing for 2027?**  
A shift to a four-day destination retreat in a city like Lisbon, Tokyo, or Marrakech—with sponsor-subsidized hotels and a speaker roster focused on operating executives rather than celebrity authors—could reignite interest. That version would be worth the longer travel and higher investment.

## Sources

- [Chief Membership and Community Platform for Senior Women Leaders](https://chief.com/)
- [Chief Frequently Asked Questions](https://chief.com/faq)
- [Chief Upgraded Membership Packages](https://chief.com/upgraded-chief-experience/)
- [Chief Membership Page](https://chief.com/membership)
- [Chief women's network on Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_(women's_network))
- [For $5,400 per year, Chief helps women reach the C-suite — TechCrunch](https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/15/chief-wants-to-help-women-reach-the-c-suite-for-5800-per-year/)
- [Chief, the women's networking startup, valued at $1 billion — Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chief-5-800-per-women-113000590.html)
- [Chief's Study Finds 80% of Women Leaders Use Networking to Drive Career Success — BusinessWire](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230719423838/en/Chiefs-Study-Finds-80-of-Women-Leaders-Use-Networking-to-Drive-Career-Success)

Was this helpful?

Deep dive · related in the library

Kory White