What does Fortune's 2023 reporting on Chief's retention tell us heading into 2027?

1. What Fortune Reported in March 2023

Per Fortune's March 16, 2023 piece by Emma Hinchliffe and Paige McGlauflin, several Chief members and former members described what the publication framed as "growing pains" at the then-$1.1 billion women's leadership network. The reporting did not present a single audited statistic; it aggregated member testimony. The headline data point that traveled furthest was the claim, sourced to people Fortune spoke with, that roughly half of Core group members did not renew after their first year. Fortune attributed this to "members" rather than to leaked internal dashboards, and the article was careful to note that Chief contested the number.

The follow-up Fortune piece four days later (March 20, 2023) expanded the same theme under the explicit "growing pains" frame. Members reportedly described matchmaking delays — one former Los Angeles member told Fortune she waited nearly four months for a Core placement after joining in March 2021 — and a generic support inbox that, per the published reporting, was slow to respond or did not respond. The word "ghosting" appeared not as Fortune's editorial characterization but as language members themselves used when describing peer-to-peer engagement inside the network.

Chief's response, as captured in the Fortune coverage, had two parts: it acknowledged "growing pains" and said it had addressed operational issues, and it characterized claims of high turnover as "false." What is notably absent from the public record, then and now, is a counter-number. Chief did not, per the published reporting, share an alternative first-year renewal rate, a Net Promoter equivalent, or any third-party-audited member satisfaction figure that a prospective member could weigh against Fortune's member-sourced 50% claim. That asymmetry — reported figure on one side, denial without disclosure on the other — is the structural feature that has not changed in the three years since.

2. What Chief Has Said (Publicly) Since

In the months following the Fortune coverage, Chief continued to reference membership scale — figures in the 20,000-plus range circulated in 2023, alongside the often-cited 60,000-person waitlist. What did not appear in any public Chief communication that this analysis could locate is a renewal rate, a churn rate, or a published year-over-year retention disclosure for Core groups specifically.

The intervening events are documented and not in dispute. In late April 2023, TechCrunch reported that Chief laid off approximately 14% of its staff, characterized at the time as a restructuring; the layoffs reportedly hit US headcount more than the smaller, newer UK operation. By 2024, per multiple outlets and the company's Wikipedia entry, the UK expansion had been wound down. In February 2025, per Inc.'s coverage and a Businesswire announcement, co-founder Carolyn Childers stepped aside as CEO, with co-founder Lindsay Kaplan also transitioning out of her chief brand officer role; Alison Moore, formerly CEO of Comic Relief US, took over as CEO effective February 3, 2025. Childers moved to board chair, Kaplan to board director.

Chief has, per the public record, continued to position itself as a leadership network producing executive value. What it has not done, per the same public record, is publish the one metric that would directly rebut Fortune's 2023 reporting: a transparent renewal number, preferably broken out by cohort and tenure. Members tell Fortune one thing; Chief disputes it. The arbiter — an audited figure — has not been added.

3. What 2027 Prospective Members Should Take From This

A careful prospective member in 2027 should treat the absence of a published renewal figure as itself a piece of information. It is not proof that the Fortune-sourced 50% claim was correct. It is also not nothing. Industry-standard professional membership organizations — the kind referenced in HBR's coverage of community businesses — typically disclose renewal benchmarks in the 70-85% band for healthy paid networks. The decision to neither confirm nor publish a counter-figure, three years after the original reporting, is a posture, and prospective members are entitled to read that posture as part of the offer.

The framework here is not "Fortune was right" or "Chief was right." It is: weigh both, then ask for the data that would resolve them. A 2027 prospective member can reasonably request, in writing, the current Core renewal rate, the median time-to-Core-placement for new joiners in their city, the current member-to-staff support ratio, and the named successor stewards of any programming that founder-era leaders championed. If those numbers are provided and are strong, the original Fortune-sourced concerns are substantially blunted. If they are declined or deflected, the prospective member has learned something Fortune's 2023 reporting only hinted at.

Related on PULSE

• [How Do I Get Out of a Commercial Lease Early Without Paying a Fortune?](/knowledge/q13646)
• [What does Datadog's 2025 RIF tell us about 2027?](/knowledge/q1699)
• [What does Salesloft 2024 Vista RIF tell us about 2027?](/knowledge/q1818)
• [What does Outreach 2024 RIF tell us about 2027?](/knowledge/q1759)
• [What does ServiceNow's 2025 RIF tell us about 2027?](/knowledge/q1639)
• [Should I open or buy a Tims Hortons US franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14986)

The Structural Tension: Community vs. Scale

The 2023 retention reporting revealed a tension that is common in membership organizations that attempt to scale rapidly: the very personalization that makes a network valuable becomes harder to deliver as membership grows. Chief’s original value proposition centered on curated, high-touch connections among senior women executives—a model that works well at hundreds of members but strains at thousands. By 2023, Chief had reportedly grown to over 20,000 members across multiple cities, a scale that inevitably changes the nature of the experience. The matchmaking complaints Fortune documented—delayed introductions, ghosted requests—are symptoms of this structural challenge rather than isolated operational failures. For someone evaluating Chief in 2027, the relevant question is whether the organization has acknowledged this tension and built systems to address it, or whether it continues to market a boutique experience while operating at industrial scale. No public data currently confirms which path Chief has chosen, but the 2025 CEO transition to Alison Moore, who has experience scaling professional services organizations, suggests an awareness that the 2023 model needed structural change rather than just tactical fixes.

What Comparable Networks Reveal About Retention Benchmarks

To assess whether Chief’s reported ~50% first-year non-renewal rate is unusual, it helps to look at retention patterns in analogous membership networks. Executive peer groups like YPO (Young Presidents’ Organization) and Vistage typically report annual retention rates in the 85-95% range, but these organizations have decades of operational refinement and strict membership caps per chapter. Professional women’s networks that launched in the 2010s—such as Ellevate Network and The Wing (which shut down in 2022)—have historically seen first-year renewal rates ranging from roughly 40-70%, with the lower end often correlating with rapid expansion phases. Industry analysts who study subscription-based professional communities note that a 50% first-year renewal rate is not necessarily fatal if the organization has strong second- and third-year retention (where members who find value become deeply engaged). However, the absence of any published multi-year retention data from Chief means prospective members cannot determine whether the reported 50% figure represents an early-stage churn problem or a systemic value gap. By 2027, any mature membership organization should be able to point to at least a three-year retention trend—the fact that Chief has not done so publicly is itself a data point worth weighing.

The Financial Implications of the Retention Gap

Retention rates directly affect the economics of membership organizations, and the 2023 reporting hinted at financial pressures that later materialized. If Chief’s first-year non-renewal rate was indeed near 50%, the organization would need to replace roughly half its membership base annually just to maintain revenue—a costly proposition given that member acquisition typically involves significant marketing spend, sales commissions, and onboarding resources. The April 2023 layoff of 14% of staff (reported by TechCrunch) and the 2024 shutdown of the UK expansion are consistent with an organization adjusting to unit economics that don’t pencil out at the promised scale. Membership organizations with healthy retention typically reinvest in member experience; those with retention problems often cut costs first. For a 2027 prospective member, the financial health of Chief matters because it affects the quality of programming, the responsiveness of matchmaking, and the likelihood that the network will still exist in five years. Without audited financials or published retention data, the best available proxy is observable behavior: the 2023-2025 pattern of contraction and leadership change suggests an organization still searching for a sustainable model, not one that has solved the retention challenge Fortune first documented.

FAQ

Is the 50% non-renewal rate from Fortune's 2023 reporting accurate? The figure came from member sources cited in Fortune's article, not from Chief's own data. Chief disputed the number but chose not to publish an alternative renewal rate or any audited retention metric. In 2027, the accuracy of that specific percentage is less important than the fact that no verified counter-data has ever been made public.

Has Chief ever released official retention or renewal numbers since 2023? No. As of 2027, Chief has not published any audited or independently verified renewal rate for its Core membership. The company has not provided a public benchmark that prospective members could use to evaluate retention trends over time.

What other events have occurred since the Fortune report that are relevant? In April 2023, Chief laid off roughly 14% of its staff, as reported by TechCrunch. In 2024, the company shut down its UK operations. In February 2025, Chief underwent a CEO transition. These events, combined with the lack of transparent retention data, add context for anyone considering membership.

Does the lack of published retention data mean Chief is hiding something? Not necessarily—companies often choose not to disclose sensitive metrics. However, for a membership organization where renewal rates are a core signal of value, the absence of any public, audited figure over several years is unusual. It means prospective members must rely on anecdotal reports and observable business changes rather than hard data.

How should a prospective 2027 member weigh the Fortune report against Chief's denial? The most prudent approach is to treat the member-sourced claims as one data point and Chief's denial as another, with neither being independently verifiable. The broader pattern—layoffs, market exits, leadership change, and no published retention numbers—may be more informative than any single disputed statistic.

Could Chief's retention have improved significantly since 2023 without public disclosure? It's possible, but there is no public evidence to confirm or refute that. Companies sometimes improve metrics quietly. However, given the subsequent operational changes and the continued lack of transparency, a prospective member would have no way to verify such an improvement without direct access to internal data or independent audits.

Sources

• Fortune, March 16, 2023 — "Chief members question $1B women network's fast growth": https://fortune.com/2023/03/16/chief-womens-network-startup-price-valuation-waitlist-members/
• Fortune, March 20, 2023 — "Inside Chief, women's networking startup worth $1.1B": https://fortune.com/2023/03/20/chief-womens-network-startup-members-waitlist-valuation-growing-pains/
• TechCrunch, April 27, 2023 — "Chief, a professional network for women leaders, cuts staff amid restructuring effort": https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/27/chief-a-professional-network-for-women-leaders-cuts-staff-amid-restructuring-effort/
• Wikipedia — "Chief (women's network)": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_(women%27s_network)
• Inc., 2025 — "Chief Is Getting a New CEO": https://www.inc.com/sarah-lynch/chief-is-getting-a-new-ceo-all-about-the-new-head-of-the-womens-leadership-network/91105624
• Yahoo / Fortune syndication — "growing pains" reprint: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/inside-growing-pains-chief-exclusive-120131332.html
• Intellizence — 2025 CEO appointments log: https://intellizence.com/insights/executive-appointments/latest-ceo-changes-and-appointments/
• Harvard Business Review — community/membership renewal benchmarks (general reference for industry norms): https://hbr.org/