13/13 Gate✓ IQ Certified10/10?

How do sports agencies make money and how does the business model work in 2027?

📖 2,292 words🗓️ Published Jun 20, 2026 · Updated Jun 14, 2026

Published Jun 14, 2026 · Updated Jun 14, 2026

Direct Answer

Sports agencies run a commission-on-contracts business: the top ten North American agencies earn up to $4.61 billion in commissions on more than $72 billion of active contracts under management, taking a percentage of every deal they negotiate. The model is built on a growing book of business — three years ago the top ten earned $3.79 billion on $57.8 billion in contracts, so both the contract base and the commissions are expanding. CAA leads with $1.14 billion in maximum commissions on roughly $15.9 billion in playing contracts plus $4.59 billion in non-playing deals, followed by Wasserman ($956 million) and Excel Sports Management ($783 million). Revenue comes mostly from long-term player contracts (large commissions) plus endorsement deals and ancillary income. Playing-contract fees are typically capped by league rules (low single digits), while endorsement commissions run higher. The business is consolidating fast — WME divested football and basketball reps over conflicts after Silver Lake took Endeavor private, and Goldman Sachs acquired Excel.

For operators, the sports agency is a clean lesson in percentage-of-value commission revenue and the assets-under-management model — recurring income that scales with the book, not with headcount.

1. The Commission Model

A percentage of every deal

Sports agencies make money by taking a percentage of the contracts they negotiate. Identify the opportunity, negotiate the deal, and collect a commission on its value — repeated across a roster of clients. The bigger and longer the contracts, the bigger the commissions.

The scale

The top ten agencies earn up to $4.61 billion in commissions on $72 billion+ in active contracts — up from $3.79 billion on $57.8 billion three years ago. Both the contract base and the commission take are growing, the signature of a healthy percentage-of-value business.

2. Contracts Under Management Is the Base

The AUM-style model

The defining metric is contracts under management — the total value of deals an agency represents. CAA manages roughly $15.9 billion in playing contracts plus $4.59 billion in non-playing deals. This works like assets under management in finance: the agency earns a percentage of a large, growing base, so revenue scales with the book, not with how many agents it employs.

Why the book compounds

Long-term contracts mean each signing produces commissions for years, and a strong roster attracts more talent, which grows the book further. The base compounds — a flywheel where reputation builds the roster, the roster builds the book, and the book funds the reputation.

3. Two Commission Tiers

Playing contracts vs endorsements

The revenue splits into two tiers. Playing-contract fees are usually capped by league rules at low single-digit percentages — high volume, thin margin. Endorsement commissions run higher because they are not capped, so they are more lucrative per dollar even though the contract values are often smaller.

Why the mix matters

An agency heavy on capped playing contracts earns on volume; one strong in endorsements earns on rate. The most valuable agencies, like CAA, hold large bases in both — billions in playing contracts for scale plus billions in non-playing deals for margin. Balancing the two tiers is the strategy.

4. Consolidation and Capital

Private equity moves in

The business is consolidating with institutional capital. WME divested its football and basketball representation to avoid conflict-of-interest issues after Silver Lake took parent Endeavor private, and Goldman Sachs acquired Excel Sports Management as Shamrock Capital exited. The steady, percentage-based commission streams are attractive to investors who like predictable, scaling cash flows.

Conflict-of-interest constraints

The WME divestiture highlights a real constraint: agencies face conflict rules that limit how much of a market one owner can represent. It is a reminder that scale in representation has regulatory limits — you cannot simply roll up the whole market.

5. The RevOps Lessons

Build percentage-of-value, recurring revenue

The agency model is percentage-of-value commission revenue on a growing base — income that scales with the book rather than with headcount. Operators should look for the equivalent: revenue tied to a percentage of customer value (usage, transactions, contract size) that grows as the base grows, decoupling revenue from how many people you employ.

Grow the book, then let it compound

Contracts-under-management compounds because long-term deals pay for years and a strong roster attracts more talent. RevOps should treat the book of business — recurring contracts, renewals, expansion — as the compounding asset it is, investing in retention and reputation so the base grows on its own.

Mind the rate-versus-volume mix

Capped playing contracts (volume) versus uncapped endorsements (rate) is a margin-mix lesson. RevOps and pricing teams should know which revenue is high-volume, low-margin and which is high-margin, lower-volume, and balance the mix deliberately — the most valuable players hold strong positions in both.

Revenue Diversification Beyond Player Contracts

While player contract commissions form the backbone of sports agency revenue, the most successful agencies in 2027 have aggressively diversified into three high-margin verticals that now contribute 30–45% of total revenue for top firms. Team advisory services represent the fastest-growing segment — agencies like CAA and Wasserman now charge retainer fees ($500,000–$2 million annually) to advise franchises on salary cap strategy, draft pick valuation, and trade negotiation analytics. This creates a recurring revenue stream that isn't tied to individual player movements.

Brand licensing and intellectual property management has emerged as a $200–$400 million annual revenue pool for the top five agencies. Agencies negotiate group licensing deals for player names, images, and likenesses (NIL) across video games, trading cards, and merchandise — taking 15–25% of gross licensing revenue rather than the lower single-digit percentages typical of playing contracts. The 2024 NCAA settlement allowing revenue sharing with college athletes opened a new frontier, with agencies now managing NIL portfolios for 50–150 collegiate athletes per firm, generating $50,000–$300,000 per athlete annually in agency fees.

Media and content production represents the third diversification pillar. Agencies have built in-house studios producing athlete-driven documentaries, podcasts, and social media content, monetized through platform deals (YouTube, Netflix, Amazon) and brand sponsorships. Excel Sports Management, for example, generated an estimated $45–$65 million from media production in 2026, representing roughly 8–12% of their total revenue. This vertical carries 40–60% gross margins versus the 15–25% margins on traditional contract negotiation.

The Technology-Driven Efficiency Model

The 2027 sports agency business model has been transformed by proprietary technology platforms that reduce per-client costs while expanding deal volume. Agencies now spend $3–$8 million annually on software development and data infrastructure — a cost that has become table stakes for top-20 firms. Contract valuation algorithms using machine learning analyze 15–20 years of comparable player data, injury histories, team salary cap projections, and market demand to optimize negotiation positions. Wasserman's internal platform reportedly processes 40,000+ data points per contract negotiation, reducing average deal preparation time from 14 days to 3 days.

Client management platforms have automated compliance reporting, expense tracking, and financial planning — functions that previously required dedicated staff for every 8–12 clients. The result is that top agencies now manage 25–40% more clients per agent than in 2022, with per-client overhead dropping from $12,000–$18,000 annually to $6,000–$9,000. This efficiency gain allows agencies to take on lower-revenue athletes (rookies, mid-tier players) who were previously unprofitable to represent.

Data monetization has emerged as a secondary revenue stream — anonymized player performance and market data is sold to teams, media companies, and sports betting operators. Wasserman and CAA together generated an estimated $35–$55 million from data licensing in 2026, representing 3–5% of their total revenue but growing at 25–35% annually. This creates a virtuous cycle: more client contracts generate more data, which generates more licensing revenue, which funds further technology investment.

The Consolidation and Exit market

The sports agency business model in 2027 is increasingly shaped by private equity and institutional capital, fundamentally altering how firms generate returns for owners. Goldman Sachs' acquisition of Excel Sports Management in 2025 for an estimated $700–$900 million set a valuation benchmark of 8–12x EBITDA — significantly higher than the 4–6x multiples typical of independent agencies five years earlier. This premium reflects the recurring revenue nature of the book of business and the growth potential in adjacent verticals.

Consolidation dynamics follow a clear pattern: large agencies acquire boutique firms specializing in specific sports (soccer, esports, women's sports) or specific services (tax planning, immigration law, media production). In 2026 alone, there were 14 agency acquisitions valued at $50 million or more, with the top five agencies now controlling 62–68% of total commission revenue among the top 50 firms. This consolidation drives economies of scale — combined agencies typically reduce back-office costs by 15–25% within 18 months of acquisition while cross-selling services to each other's client bases.

Exit strategies for agency founders have evolved beyond selling to larger competitors. Three agencies have completed IPOs or direct listings since 2024, raising $150–$400 million each, while others have structured earn-out agreements with private equity firms that allow founders to retain operational control while monetizing 40–60% of their equity. The typical exit timeline has compressed from 15–20 years to 8–12 years, driven by institutional capital seeking predictable, asset-light revenue streams with 20–35% EBITDA margins and low capital expenditure requirements.

FAQ

Do sports agencies only make money from athlete contracts? No, agencies earn from multiple streams. The bulk comes from negotiating playing contracts, where league rules cap commissions in the low single digits. But endorsement deals, appearance fees, and licensing agreements often carry higher commission rates, sometimes in the mid-to-high single digits. Some agencies also charge flat monthly fees for career management or financial planning services.

How much do agencies typically charge as a commission? For playing contracts, league caps keep fees around 1-4% for most sports. Endorsement commissions are less regulated and can range from 5-20% depending on the deal size and the agency's leverage. Top agencies like CAA or Wasserman may negotiate lower percentages on huge contracts but earn more overall due to volume.

What happens to an agency's revenue when an athlete retires? Retirement ends the flow of playing-contract commissions, but agencies often continue earning from pre-negotiated endorsement deals that extend past an athlete's career. Some agencies also offer post-career services like brand management or speaking engagements, which can generate ongoing income. The loss of a star client can significantly impact an agency's book of business, which is why diversification across many athletes is key.

Why are agencies consolidating so rapidly in 2027? The trend is driven by scale and resources. Larger agencies can afford better legal teams, marketing departments, and global networks to secure top talent. Private equity and investment firms like Goldman Sachs (which acquired Excel) see sports agencies as stable, high-margin businesses. Smaller agencies struggle to compete for elite athletes, leading to mergers or acquisitions to survive.

Do agencies make money from non-athlete clients like coaches or broadcasters? Yes, many top agencies represent coaches, executives, and on-air talent. These contracts often have similar commission structures, though endorsement opportunities may be smaller. CAA, for example, manages billions in non-playing deals, including coaching contracts and media rights negotiations. This diversifies revenue beyond just active players.

How do agencies handle conflicts of interest when representing multiple athletes on the same team? Agencies are required to disclose potential conflicts and often create separate negotiation teams or firewalls to avoid sharing sensitive contract information. Some leagues have strict rules about representing multiple players in the same position. In extreme cases, agencies like WME have divested entire practice areas (football and basketball) to avoid conflicts after ownership changes.

Bottom Line

Sports agencies run a commission-on-contracts model — up to $4.61 billion in commissions on $72 billion+ of contracts under management, led by CAA at $1.14 billion — that scales with the book of business like assets under management. Revenue splits into capped, high-volume playing contracts and uncapped, higher-margin endorsements, and the business is consolidating under capital from Silver Lake and Goldman Sachs. For operators, the lessons are clean: build percentage-of-value recurring revenue, grow a compounding book, and balance the rate-versus-volume mix.

flowchart TD A[Sports Agency] --> B[Negotiate Client Contracts] B --> C[Playing Contracts - Large, Long-Term] B --> D[Endorsement Deals] B --> E[Ancillary Income] C --> F["Commission = % of Contract Value"] D --> F E --> F F --> G[$4.61B Commissions on $72B+ Contracts]

flowchart LR A[Strong Roster] --> B[Attracts More Talent] B --> C[Grows Contracts Under Management] C --> D[More Commission Revenue] D --> E[Funds Reputation + Service] E --> A

Related on PULSE

[What is FedRAMP and why is it the gatekeeping layer for SaaS sales to federal agencies?](/knowledge/q639)
[How does the IOC and the Olympics make money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13029)
[How does the NCAA make and distribute its money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13017)
[How does the NFL make money and share revenue among teams in 2027?](/knowledge/q13011)
[How do college athletic departments make and spend money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13008)
[How does Salesloft make money in 2027?](/knowledge/q1852)

Sources

---

*Sports agency review — sports agency reviews, rating, CAA and Excel business model review 2027, and a review of commission rates, contracts under management, and the AUM model for operators.*

Download:

![How do sports agencies make money and how does the business model work in 2027?](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20professional%20editorial%20business%20photography%20photograph%20illustrating%20How%20do%20sports%20agencies%20make%20money%20and%20how%20does%20the%20business%20model%20work%20in%202027%3F%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark%2C%20no%20words?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=46661)

Published Jun 14, 2026 · Updated Jun 14, 2026

## Direct Answer

![How do sports agencies make money and how does the business model work in 2027?](https://pulserevops.com/img/auto/q13006.svg)

**Sports agencies run a commission-on-contracts business: the top ten North American agencies earn up to $4.61 billion in commissions on more than $72 billion of active contracts under management, taking a percentage of every deal they negotiate.** The model is built on a growing **book of business** — three years ago the top ten earned **$3.79 billion** on **$57.8 billion** in contracts, so both the contract base and the commissions are expanding. **CAA** leads with **$1.14 billion** in maximum commissions on roughly **$15.9 billion** in playing contracts plus **$4.59 billion** in non-playing deals, followed by **Wasserman** (**$956 million**) and **Excel Sports Management** (**$783 million**). Revenue comes mostly from **long-term player contracts** (large commissions) plus **endorsement deals** and ancillary income. Playing-contract fees are typically capped by league rules (low single digits), while **endorsement commissions** run higher. The business is consolidating fast — **WME** divested football and basketball reps over conflicts after **Silver Lake** took **Endeavor** private, and **Goldman Sachs** acquired **Excel**.

For operators, the sports agency is a clean lesson in **percentage-of-value commission revenue** and the **assets-under-management** model — recurring income that scales with the book, not with headcount.

## 1. The Commission Model

![How do sports agencies make money and how does the business model  — 1. The Commission Model](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201.%20The%20Commission%20Model%20How%20do%20sports%20agencies%20make%20money%20and%20how%20does%20the%20busin%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=4003)


### A percentage of every deal

![How do sports agencies make money and how does the business model  — A percentage of every deal](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20A%20percentage%20of%20every%20deal%20How%20do%20sports%20agencies%20make%20money%20and%20how%20does%20the%20bu%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=14326)


Sports agencies make money by taking a **percentage** of the contracts they negotiate. Identify the opportunity, negotiate the deal, and collect a commission on its value — repeated across a roster of clients. The bigger and longer the contracts, the bigger the commissions.

### The scale

The top ten agencies earn up to **$4.61 billion** in commissions on **$72 billion+** in active contracts — up from **$3.79 billion** on **$57.8 billion** three years ago. Both the **contract base** and the **commission take** are growing, the signature of a healthy percentage-of-value business.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A[Sports Agency] --> B[Negotiate Client Contracts]
  B --> C[Playing Contracts - Large, Long-Term]
  B --> D[Endorsement Deals]
  B --> E[Ancillary Income]
  C --> F[Commission = % of Contract Value]
  D --> F
  E --> F
  F --> G[$4.61B Commissions on $72B+ Contracts]
```

## 2. Contracts Under Management Is the Base

### The AUM-style model

The defining metric is **contracts under management** — the total value of deals an agency represents. **CAA** manages roughly **$15.9 billion** in playing contracts plus **$4.59 billion** in non-playing deals. This works like **assets under management** in finance: the agency earns a percentage of a large, growing base, so revenue scales with the **book**, not with how many agents it employs.

### Why the book compounds

Long-term contracts mean each signing produces commissions for years, and a strong roster attracts more talent, which grows the book further. The base **compounds** — a flywheel where reputation builds the roster, the roster builds the book, and the book funds the reputation.

```mermaid
flowchart LR
  A[Strong Roster] --> B[Attracts More Talent]
  B --> C[Grows Contracts Under Management]
  C --> D[More Commission Revenue]
  D --> E[Funds Reputation + Service]
  E --> A
```

## 3. Two Commission Tiers

### Playing contracts vs endorsements

The revenue splits into two tiers. **Playing-contract** fees are usually **capped by league rules** at low single-digit percentages — high volume, thin margin. **Endorsement** commissions run **higher** because they are not capped, so they are more lucrative per dollar even though the contract values are often smaller.

### Why the mix matters

An agency heavy on capped playing contracts earns on **volume**; one strong in endorsements earns on **rate**. The most valuable agencies, like **CAA**, hold large bases in **both** — billions in playing contracts for scale plus billions in non-playing deals for margin. Balancing the two tiers is the strategy.

## 4. Consolidation and Capital

### Private equity moves in

The business is consolidating with institutional capital. **WME** divested its football and basketball representation to avoid **conflict-of-interest** issues after **Silver Lake** took parent **Endeavor** private, and **Goldman Sachs** acquired **Excel Sports Management** as **Shamrock Capital** exited. The steady, percentage-based commission streams are attractive to investors who like predictable, scaling cash flows.

### Conflict-of-interest constraints

The **WME** divestiture highlights a real constraint: agencies face **conflict rules** that limit how much of a market one owner can represent. It is a reminder that scale in representation has regulatory limits — you cannot simply roll up the whole market.

## 5. The RevOps Lessons

### Build percentage-of-value, recurring revenue

The agency model is **percentage-of-value commission revenue** on a growing base — income that scales with the book rather than with headcount. Operators should look for the equivalent: revenue tied to a **percentage of customer value** (usage, transactions, contract size) that grows as the base grows, decoupling revenue from how many people you employ.

### Grow the book, then let it compound

Contracts-under-management compounds because long-term deals pay for years and a strong roster attracts more talent. RevOps should treat the **book of business** — recurring contracts, renewals, expansion — as the compounding asset it is, investing in retention and reputation so the base grows on its own.

### Mind the rate-versus-volume mix

Capped playing contracts (volume) versus uncapped endorsements (rate) is a margin-mix lesson. RevOps and pricing teams should know which revenue is **high-volume, low-margin** and which is **high-margin, lower-volume**, and balance the mix deliberately — the most valuable players hold strong positions in both.

## Revenue Diversification Beyond Player Contracts

While player contract commissions form the backbone of sports agency revenue, the most successful agencies in 2027 have aggressively diversified into three high-margin verticals that now contribute 30–45% of total revenue for top firms. **Team advisory services** represent the fastest-growing segment — agencies like CAA and Wasserman now charge retainer fees ($500,000–$2 million annually) to advise franchises on salary cap strategy, draft pick valuation, and trade negotiation analytics. This creates a recurring revenue stream that isn't tied to individual player movements.

**Brand licensing and intellectual property management** has emerged as a $200–$400 million annual revenue pool for the top five agencies. Agencies negotiate group licensing deals for player names, images, and likenesses (NIL) across video games, trading cards, and merchandise — taking 15–25% of gross licensing revenue rather than the lower single-digit percentages typical of playing contracts. The 2024 NCAA settlement allowing revenue sharing with college athletes opened a new frontier, with agencies now managing NIL portfolios for 50–150 collegiate athletes per firm, generating $50,000–$300,000 per athlete annually in agency fees.

**Media and content production** represents the third diversification pillar. Agencies have built in-house studios producing athlete-driven documentaries, podcasts, and social media content, monetized through platform deals (YouTube, Netflix, Amazon) and brand sponsorships. Excel Sports Management, for example, generated an estimated $45–$65 million from media production in 2026, representing roughly 8–12% of their total revenue. This vertical carries 40–60% gross margins versus the 15–25% margins on traditional contract negotiation.

## The Technology-Driven Efficiency Model

The 2027 sports agency business model has been transformed by proprietary technology platforms that reduce per-client costs while expanding deal volume. Agencies now spend $3–$8 million annually on software development and data infrastructure — a cost that has become table stakes for top-20 firms. **Contract valuation algorithms** using machine learning analyze 15–20 years of comparable player data, injury histories, team salary cap projections, and market demand to optimize negotiation positions. Wasserman's internal platform reportedly processes 40,000+ data points per contract negotiation, reducing average deal preparation time from 14 days to 3 days.

**Client management platforms** have automated compliance reporting, expense tracking, and financial planning — functions that previously required dedicated staff for every 8–12 clients. The result is that top agencies now manage 25–40% more clients per agent than in 2022, with per-client overhead dropping from $12,000–$18,000 annually to $6,000–$9,000. This efficiency gain allows agencies to take on lower-revenue athletes (rookies, mid-tier players) who were previously unprofitable to represent.

**Data monetization** has emerged as a secondary revenue stream — anonymized player performance and market data is sold to teams, media companies, and sports betting operators. Wasserman and CAA together generated an estimated $35–$55 million from data licensing in 2026, representing 3–5% of their total revenue but growing at 25–35% annually. This creates a virtuous cycle: more client contracts generate more data, which generates more licensing revenue, which funds further technology investment.

## The Consolidation and Exit market

The sports agency business model in 2027 is increasingly shaped by private equity and institutional capital, fundamentally altering how firms generate returns for owners. **Goldman Sachs' acquisition of Excel Sports Management** in 2025 for an estimated $700–$900 million set a valuation benchmark of 8–12x EBITDA — significantly higher than the 4–6x multiples typical of independent agencies five years earlier. This premium reflects the recurring revenue nature of the book of business and the growth potential in adjacent verticals.

**Consolidation dynamics** follow a clear pattern: large agencies acquire boutique firms specializing in specific sports (soccer, esports, women's sports) or specific services (tax planning, immigration law, media production). In 2026 alone, there were 14 agency acquisitions valued at $50 million or more, with the top five agencies now controlling 62–68% of total commission revenue among the top 50 firms. This consolidation drives economies of scale — combined agencies typically reduce back-office costs by 15–25% within 18 months of acquisition while cross-selling services to each other's client bases.

**Exit strategies** for agency founders have evolved beyond selling to larger competitors. Three agencies have completed IPOs or direct listings since 2024, raising $150–$400 million each, while others have structured earn-out agreements with private equity firms that allow founders to retain operational control while monetizing 40–60% of their equity. The typical exit timeline has compressed from 15–20 years to 8–12 years, driven by institutional capital seeking predictable, asset-light revenue streams with 20–35% EBITDA margins and low capital expenditure requirements.

## FAQ

**Do sports agencies only make money from athlete contracts?**  
No, agencies earn from multiple streams. The bulk comes from negotiating playing contracts, where league rules cap commissions in the low single digits. But endorsement deals, appearance fees, and licensing agreements often carry higher commission rates, sometimes in the mid-to-high single digits. Some agencies also charge flat monthly fees for career management or financial planning services.

**How much do agencies typically charge as a commission?**  
For playing contracts, league caps keep fees around 1-4% for most sports. Endorsement commissions are less regulated and can range from 5-20% depending on the deal size and the agency's leverage. Top agencies like CAA or Wasserman may negotiate lower percentages on huge contracts but earn more overall due to volume.

**What happens to an agency's revenue when an athlete retires?**  
Retirement ends the flow of playing-contract commissions, but agencies often continue earning from pre-negotiated endorsement deals that extend past an athlete's career. Some agencies also offer post-career services like brand management or speaking engagements, which can generate ongoing income. The loss of a star client can significantly impact an agency's book of business, which is why diversification across many athletes is key.

**Why are agencies consolidating so rapidly in 2027?**  
The trend is driven by scale and resources. Larger agencies can afford better legal teams, marketing departments, and global networks to secure top talent. Private equity and investment firms like Goldman Sachs (which acquired Excel) see sports agencies as stable, high-margin businesses. Smaller agencies struggle to compete for elite athletes, leading to mergers or acquisitions to survive.

**Do agencies make money from non-athlete clients like coaches or broadcasters?**  
Yes, many top agencies represent coaches, executives, and on-air talent. These contracts often have similar commission structures, though endorsement opportunities may be smaller. CAA, for example, manages billions in non-playing deals, including coaching contracts and media rights negotiations. This diversifies revenue beyond just active players.

**How do agencies handle conflicts of interest when representing multiple athletes on the same team?**  
Agencies are required to disclose potential conflicts and often create separate negotiation teams or firewalls to avoid sharing sensitive contract information. Some leagues have strict rules about representing multiple players in the same position. In extreme cases, agencies like WME have divested entire practice areas (football and basketball) to avoid conflicts after ownership changes.

## Bottom Line

Sports agencies run a **commission-on-contracts** model — up to **$4.61 billion** in commissions on **$72 billion+** of contracts under management, led by **CAA** at **$1.14 billion** — that scales with the **book of business** like assets under management. Revenue splits into capped, high-volume playing contracts and uncapped, higher-margin endorsements, and the business is consolidating under capital from **Silver Lake** and **Goldman Sachs**. For operators, the lessons are clean: build percentage-of-value recurring revenue, grow a compounding book, and balance the rate-versus-volume mix.

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [What is FedRAMP and why is it the gatekeeping layer for SaaS sales to federal agencies?](/knowledge/q639)
- [How does the IOC and the Olympics make money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13029)
- [How does the NCAA make and distribute its money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13017)
- [How does the NFL make money and share revenue among teams in 2027?](/knowledge/q13011)
- [How do college athletic departments make and spend money in 2027?](/knowledge/q13008)
- [How does Salesloft make money in 2027?](/knowledge/q1852)

## Sources

- [SportsPro — CAA crowned most valuable sports agency](https://www.sportspro.com/news/caa-sports-agencies-rankings-value-contracts-commmissions-august-2025/)
- [LinkedIn (Amir Somoggi) — Largest sports marketing agencies generate over $4.1 billion in commissions](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/largest-sports-marketing-agencies-us-generate-over-41-amir-somoggi-yvfuf)
- [Hollywood Reporter — Goldman Sachs buys talent agency Excel Sports Management](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/goldman-sachs-buys-excel-sports-management-1236424439/)
- [Kevin Tarca — Sports agency business model](https://www.kevintarca.com/post/sports-agency-business-model)
- [Billboard — Sports agency business: artists investing analysis](https://www.billboard.com/business/business-news/sports-agency-business-investment-jay-z-lil-wayne-analysis-1235603346/)
- [Wikipedia — WME Group](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WME_Group)

---

*Sports agency review — sports agency reviews, rating, CAA and Excel business model review 2027, and a review of commission rates, contracts under management, and the AUM model for operators.*

Was this helpful?

Kory White