What does the 2027 wave of SaaS vendor consolidation mean for RevOps tech stacks?

👁 1 view📖 1,712 words⏱ 8 min read📅 Published Jun 15, 2026

What does the 2027 wave of SaaS vendor consolidation mean for RevOps tech stacks?

Direct Answer

The 2027 consolidation wave is collapsing the best-of-breed revenue stack into a handful of platform owners, and the practical effect is that RevOps loses negotiating leverage on renewals while gaining new lock-in and data-portability risk. After Salesforce closed its $8 billion acquisition of Informatica in November 2025, the Clari-Salesloft merger combined roughly $450 million in ARR, and private-equity firms like Thoma Bravo kept rolling up category leaders, the buying question for 2027 shifted from "which point tool is best" to "which platform do I anchor on and how do I protect optionality." RevOps teams that treat consolidation as a forcing function to rationalize the stack — rather than passively renewing into bundles — will protect both budget and data.

1. What is actually driving the 2027 consolidation wave

Platform owners are buying the data layer, not just features. Salesforce's $8 billion purchase of Informatica (announced May 2025, completed November 18, 2025) was explicitly about owning data catalog, MDM, governance, and integration to feed agentic AI inside Data Cloud. When the CRM owner also owns the pipes, every downstream RevOps decision routes through one vendor.
Private equity has reopened the deal machine. Thoma Bravo closed roughly $42 billion in acquisitions in 2025, including a $12.3 billion take-private of Dayforce. Thoma Bravo and Vista Equity Partners have collectively deployed over $120 billion in software since 2019. Their playbook is well documented: cost cuts, renewal price increases, and roll-ups of category leaders with 90%-plus net retention.
Tool sprawl is the symptom the market is selling against. Median revenue orgs are running 22 to 31 sales tools with overlapping AI features, and analysts now cite AI tool sprawl as a top cause of stalled ARR growth in mid-market and enterprise B2B. Vendors are pitching consolidation as the cure they happen to sell.
Cheap financing returned. Deal flow in H2 2025 and Q1 2026 hit its highest level since 2021 as rates moderated and leveraged-buyout financing reopened, which is why the wave accelerates into 2027 rather than cooling.

2. Platform bundle versus best-of-breed tradeoffs

Bundles reduce admin burden on paper and sometimes increase it in practice. The Clari-Salesloft combination (closed December 2025, combined ARR around $450 million) promises a single Revenue Orchestration Platform, but buyers in early 2026 were purchasing a platform in transition where two systems were never built to share one data model.
The real cost comparison is concrete. A 100-rep mid-market team running Gong plus Clari plus Salesloft typically spends $180,000 to $240,000 per year combined. A bundle can lower that line item while raising switching cost.
Best-of-breed still wins on depth. Gong shipped Mission Andromeda and Outreach shipped Omni in 2026 precisely because focused vendors out-iterate suites on their core surface. RevOps trades that depth for one throat to choke.
Native bundles assume you anchor on their CRM. HubSpot-native teams adopt Breeze for enrichment and intent rather than integrating a separate vendor, but that economics only works if HubSpot is the primary CRM. The bundle is cheap until you want to leave it.

3. How renewal and pricing leverage shifts

PE ownership changes the renewal conversation. Firms like Thoma Bravo target subscription ARR with 90%-plus renewal rates specifically because high retention gives them pricing power on renewals. Expect list increases and the quiet removal of legacy discounts at renewal under new ownership.
Bundling erodes line-item leverage. When Clari and Salesloft become one SKU, RevOps can no longer play forecasting and engagement vendors against each other on price. The competitive tension that drove discounts disappears.
Module pricing hides the real number. ZoomInfo expanded into Engage, Chorus, MarketingOS, OperationsOS, and Global Data Passport, but each module carries its own price tag, so the "platform" discount frequently evaporates once you add the contact-level intent upgrade you actually needed.
Negotiate against the roll-up thesis. PE owners need clean renewals to support their debt. That creates leverage: multi-year commitments, locked pricing, and portability clauses are easier to win in the 12 months after an acquisition closes than later.

4. Integration and data-portability risk

One owner of the data layer is one owner of your exit cost. With Informatica now inside Salesforce, integration and governance tooling that used to be neutral becomes strategically aligned to one CRM. Verify that your data catalog and MDM remain exportable.
Post-merger data models rarely merge cleanly. RevOps teams managing the Clari-Salesloft transition reported admin burden potentially increasing, not decreasing, because they now reconcile integration decisions across systems that predate the merger.
Demand portability in writing. Contractually require bulk export of activity data, call recordings, forecasts, and enrichment records in open formats. If a vendor cannot commit to that, treat it as a lock-in signal.
Keep your warehouse as the system of record. Landing Gong, Clari, HubSpot, and ZoomInfo data in Snowflake or BigQuery means a vendor swap is a pipeline change, not a data migration.

5. Vendor lock-in and the optionality problem

Anchor consciously, not by default. Pick one or two strategic anchors (typically the CRM and the data layer) and accept that everything else should remain swappable. The mistake is letting the anchor vendor absorb adjacent categories by inertia.
Avoid single-vendor monocultures around AI agents. The 2026 buying question became "agent or assistant, and does it write back to Salesforce or just summarize calls." A stack where every agent depends on one platform's write-back has no fallback if pricing or roadmap turns.
Watch for category capture. When a platform owner acquires your point tool, your renewal, your roadmap, and your data residency all consolidate under one negotiation. Map which of your tools are acquisition targets before the deal is announced.
Maintain a credible alternative. Keeping a live evaluation of one competitor per category (a Gong alternative, a ZoomInfo alternative) is cheap insurance that preserves real switching leverage.

6. How RevOps should rationalize the stack and protect optionality

Inventory and score every tool. Map all 22-to-31 tools against owner, renewal date, annual cost, overlapping AI features, and acquisition risk. Kill duplicate AI surfaces first — that is where sprawl hides.
Separate systems of record from systems of action. The CRM and the warehouse are records; engagement, forecasting, and intelligence tools are actions and should stay replaceable.
Time renewals against the M&A calendar. Negotiate hardest in the window right after a vendor is acquired, when the new PE owner needs clean retention numbers.
Standardize on an integration layer you control. A neutral integration and reverse-ETL tier means consolidating vendors does not consolidate your dependencies.
Build the rationalization business case in dollars. Show the $180,000-to-$240,000 combined spend against a consolidated alternative, then weigh it against the switching cost and lock-in you would absorb.

flowchart TD A[Annual stack review] --> B{Is this tool a system of record?} B -->|Yes: CRM or warehouse| C[Anchor: negotiate multi-year + portability clause] B -->|No: engagement / intel / forecast| D{Acquired or PE-owned in last 12 mo?} D -->|Yes| E[Renew short-term, lock price, keep live alternative] D -->|No| F{Overlapping AI feature with another tool?} F -->|Yes| G[Consolidate or cut the weaker surface] F -->|No| H[Retain and monitor renewal date] C --> I[Land all data in warehouse] E --> I G --> I H --> I I --> J[Stack rationalized, optionality protected]

flowchart LR subgraph Consolidate A1[Duplicate AI summarizers] A2[Overlapping intent feeds] A3[Redundant dialers] end subgraph Keep_Best_of_Breed B1[Deepest core surface - Gong / Outreach] B2[Mission-critical forecasting] end subgraph Anchor C1[CRM - Salesforce or HubSpot] C2[Data layer - Informatica / warehouse] end A1 --> D[Bundle into platform] A2 --> D A3 --> D B1 --> E[Retain on standalone contract] B2 --> E C1 --> F[Multi-year + portability] C2 --> F

FAQ

Should I just move everything onto one platform to cut costs? Not reflexively. A bundle can lower the line item while raising switching cost and removing the price tension that earned you discounts. Consolidate duplicate AI surfaces aggressively, but keep your CRM and data layer governed by portability terms so a future exit stays affordable.

Does the Salesforce-Informatica deal change how I handle my data? Yes. Informatica's catalog, MDM, and integration tooling now sit inside Salesforce and align to Data Cloud. Confirm your governance and master-data tooling remains exportable, and keep a warehouse as the neutral system of record so you are not dependent on one CRM owner for data residency.

How does private-equity ownership affect my renewals? Firms like Thoma Bravo and Vista buy high-retention software to exercise renewal pricing power. Expect list increases and quietly retired legacy discounts. Your best leverage is the 12 months after a deal closes, when the new owner needs clean retention figures.

Is best-of-breed dead in 2027? No. Focused vendors like Gong and Outreach still out-iterate suites on their core surface, which is why they keep shipping major releases. The shift is that best-of-breed now lives alongside one or two strategic anchors rather than being the whole stack.

What is the single biggest risk RevOps faces from consolidation? Losing data portability. When the platform owner also owns your integration and data layer, your exit cost balloons. Contractual bulk-export rights in open formats and a warehouse-as-record architecture are the two protections that matter most.

How do I know if one of my tools is about to be acquired? Track category leaders with 90%-plus retention and standalone scale — those are exactly what Thoma Bravo and Vista target. Map each tool's acquisition risk during your annual review so a deal announcement is a planned event, not a fire drill.

Bottom Line

The 2027 consolidation wave is real, financed, and accelerating: Salesforce now owns Informatica, Clari and Salesloft are one company, and Thoma Bravo and Vista Equity Partners keep absorbing category leaders for their renewal pricing power. For RevOps, the danger is passive renewal into bundles that quietly raise prices and deepen lock-in.

The response is active rationalization — anchor deliberately on a CRM and a data layer, keep engagement and intelligence tools swappable, land all data in a warehouse you control, demand portability in writing, and negotiate hardest in the window right after a vendor is acquired.

Consolidation handled well cuts sprawl and cost; handled passively, it cedes both your budget and your data.

Sources

Salesforce — "Salesforce Completes Acquisition of Informatica" (Nov 18, 2025): https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2025/11/18/salesforce-completes-acquisition-of-informatica/
Salesforce — "Salesforce Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Informatica" (May 27, 2025): https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2025/05/27/salesforce-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-informatica/
SiliconANGLE — "Salesforce to acquire Informatica at $8B valuation": https://siliconangle.com/2025/05/27/salesforce-acquire-informatica-8b-valuation/
CB Insights Research — "Sales tech stack consolidation is coming. So who's winning?": https://www.cbinsights.com/research/the-transcript-sales-tech-stack-consolidation/
MaxIQ — "Clari & Salesloft Merger Explained (2026): Risks, Costs & Alternatives": https://www.getmaxiq.com/blog/clari-salesloft-merger-guide
PitchGrade Research — "Enterprise Software M&A: Thoma Bravo, Vista, and the Buyout Playbook in 2026": https://pitchgrade.com/research/enterprise-software-ma-2026
Yahoo Finance — "Orlando Bravo: Now's the time to buy software amid SaaS-pocalypse gloom": https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/orlando-bravo-nows-time-buy-215329518.html
Amplemarket — "Why companies are switching from ZoomInfo (2026)": https://www.amplemarket.com/blog/why-companies-switch-from-zoominfo
Oliv.ai — "Gong vs Clari Compared (2026)": https://www.oliv.ai/blog/gong-vs-clari
CX Today — "Gartner Magic Quadrant for CRM Customer Engagement Center 2025: The Rundown": https://www.cxtoday.com/crm/gartner-magic-quadrant-crm-customer-engagement-center-2025/

Keep reading

# What does the 2027 wave of SaaS vendor consolidation mean for RevOps tech stacks?

## Direct Answer

The 2027 consolidation wave is collapsing the best-of-breed revenue stack into a handful of platform owners, and **the practical effect is that RevOps loses negotiating leverage on renewals while gaining new lock-in and data-portability risk**. After **Salesforce** closed its **$8 billion** acquisition of **Informatica** in November 2025, the **Clari**-**Salesloft** merger combined roughly **$450 million** in ARR, and private-equity firms like **Thoma Bravo** kept rolling up category leaders, the buying question for 2027 shifted from "which point tool is best" to "which platform do I anchor on and how do I protect optionality." RevOps teams that treat consolidation as a forcing function to rationalize the stack — rather than passively renewing into bundles — will protect both budget and data.

## 1. What is actually driving the 2027 consolidation wave

- **Platform owners are buying the data layer, not just features.** Salesforce's **$8 billion** purchase of **Informatica** (announced May 2025, completed November 18, 2025) was explicitly about owning data catalog, MDM, governance, and integration to feed agentic AI inside Data Cloud. When the CRM owner also owns the pipes, every downstream RevOps decision routes through one vendor.
- **Private equity has reopened the deal machine.** **Thoma Bravo** closed roughly **$42 billion** in acquisitions in 2025, including a **$12.3 billion** take-private of **Dayforce**. **Thoma Bravo** and **Vista Equity Partners** have collectively deployed over **$120 billion** in software since 2019. Their playbook is well documented: cost cuts, renewal price increases, and roll-ups of category leaders with 90%-plus net retention.
- **Tool sprawl is the symptom the market is selling against.** Median revenue orgs are running **22 to 31** sales tools with overlapping AI features, and analysts now cite AI tool sprawl as a top cause of stalled ARR growth in mid-market and enterprise B2B. Vendors are pitching consolidation as the cure they happen to sell.
- **Cheap financing returned.** Deal flow in H2 2025 and Q1 2026 hit its highest level since 2021 as rates moderated and leveraged-buyout financing reopened, which is why the wave accelerates into 2027 rather than cooling.

## 2. Platform bundle versus best-of-breed tradeoffs

- **Bundles reduce admin burden on paper and sometimes increase it in practice.** The **Clari**-**Salesloft** combination (closed December 2025, combined ARR around **$450 million**) promises a single Revenue Orchestration Platform, but buyers in early 2026 were purchasing a platform in transition where two systems were never built to share one data model.
- **The real cost comparison is concrete.** A 100-rep mid-market team running **Gong** plus **Clari** plus **Salesloft** typically spends **$180,000 to $240,000** per year combined. A bundle can lower that line item while raising switching cost.
- **Best-of-breed still wins on depth.** **Gong** shipped Mission Andromeda and **Outreach** shipped Omni in 2026 precisely because focused vendors out-iterate suites on their core surface. RevOps trades that depth for one throat to choke.
- **Native bundles assume you anchor on their CRM.** **HubSpot**-native teams adopt Breeze for enrichment and intent rather than integrating a separate vendor, but that economics only works if **HubSpot** is the primary CRM. The bundle is cheap until you want to leave it.

## 3. How renewal and pricing leverage shifts

- **PE ownership changes the renewal conversation.** Firms like **Thoma Bravo** target subscription ARR with 90%-plus renewal rates specifically because high retention gives them pricing power on renewals. Expect list increases and the quiet removal of legacy discounts at renewal under new ownership.
- **Bundling erodes line-item leverage.** When **Clari** and **Salesloft** become one SKU, RevOps can no longer play forecasting and engagement vendors against each other on price. The competitive tension that drove discounts disappears.
- **Module pricing hides the real number.** **ZoomInfo** expanded into Engage, Chorus, MarketingOS, OperationsOS, and Global Data Passport, but each module carries its own price tag, so the "platform" discount frequently evaporates once you add the contact-level intent upgrade you actually needed.
- **Negotiate against the roll-up thesis.** PE owners need clean renewals to support their debt. That creates leverage: multi-year commitments, locked pricing, and portability clauses are easier to win in the 12 months after an acquisition closes than later.

## 4. Integration and data-portability risk

- **One owner of the data layer is one owner of your exit cost.** With **Informatica** now inside Salesforce, integration and governance tooling that used to be neutral becomes strategically aligned to one CRM. Verify that your data catalog and MDM remain exportable.
- **Post-merger data models rarely merge cleanly.** RevOps teams managing the **Clari**-**Salesloft** transition reported admin burden potentially increasing, not decreasing, because they now reconcile integration decisions across systems that predate the merger.
- **Demand portability in writing.** Contractually require bulk export of activity data, call recordings, forecasts, and enrichment records in open formats. If a vendor cannot commit to that, treat it as a lock-in signal.
- **Keep your warehouse as the system of record.** Landing **Gong**, **Clari**, **HubSpot**, and **ZoomInfo** data in **Snowflake** or **BigQuery** means a vendor swap is a pipeline change, not a data migration.

## 5. Vendor lock-in and the optionality problem

- **Anchor consciously, not by default.** Pick one or two strategic anchors (typically the CRM and the data layer) and accept that everything else should remain swappable. The mistake is letting the anchor vendor absorb adjacent categories by inertia.
- **Avoid single-vendor monocultures around AI agents.** The 2026 buying question became "agent or assistant, and does it write back to Salesforce or just summarize calls." A stack where every agent depends on one platform's write-back has no fallback if pricing or roadmap turns.
- **Watch for category capture.** When a platform owner acquires your point tool, your renewal, your roadmap, and your data residency all consolidate under one negotiation. Map which of your tools are acquisition targets before the deal is announced.
- **Maintain a credible alternative.** Keeping a live evaluation of one competitor per category (a **Gong** alternative, a **ZoomInfo** alternative) is cheap insurance that preserves real switching leverage.

## 6. How RevOps should rationalize the stack and protect optionality

- **Inventory and score every tool.** Map all 22-to-31 tools against owner, renewal date, annual cost, overlapping AI features, and acquisition risk. Kill duplicate AI surfaces first — that is where sprawl hides.
- **Separate systems of record from systems of action.** The CRM and the warehouse are records; engagement, forecasting, and intelligence tools are actions and should stay replaceable.
- **Time renewals against the M&A calendar.** Negotiate hardest in the window right after a vendor is acquired, when the new PE owner needs clean retention numbers.
- **Standardize on an integration layer you control.** A neutral integration and reverse-ETL tier means consolidating vendors does not consolidate your dependencies.
- **Build the rationalization business case in dollars.** Show the **$180,000-to-$240,000** combined spend against a consolidated alternative, then weigh it against the switching cost and lock-in you would absorb.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Annual stack review] --> B{Is this tool a system of record?}
    B -->|Yes: CRM or warehouse| C[Anchor: negotiate multi-year + portability clause]
    B -->|No: engagement / intel / forecast| D{Acquired or PE-owned in last 12 mo?}
    D -->|Yes| E[Renew short-term, lock price, keep live alternative]
    D -->|No| F{Overlapping AI feature with another tool?}
    F -->|Yes| G[Consolidate or cut the weaker surface]
    F -->|No| H[Retain and monitor renewal date]
    C --> I[Land all data in warehouse]
    E --> I
    G --> I
    H --> I
    I --> J[Stack rationalized, optionality protected]
```

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph Consolidate
    A1[Duplicate AI summarizers]
    A2[Overlapping intent feeds]
    A3[Redundant dialers]
    end
    subgraph Keep_Best_of_Breed
    B1[Deepest core surface - Gong / Outreach]
    B2[Mission-critical forecasting]
    end
    subgraph Anchor
    C1[CRM - Salesforce or HubSpot]
    C2[Data layer - Informatica / warehouse]
    end
    A1 --> D[Bundle into platform]
    A2 --> D
    A3 --> D
    B1 --> E[Retain on standalone contract]
    B2 --> E
    C1 --> F[Multi-year + portability]
    C2 --> F
```

## FAQ

**Should I just move everything onto one platform to cut costs?** Not reflexively. A bundle can lower the line item while raising switching cost and removing the price tension that earned you discounts. Consolidate duplicate AI surfaces aggressively, but keep your CRM and data layer governed by portability terms so a future exit stays affordable.

**Does the Salesforce-Informatica deal change how I handle my data?** Yes. Informatica's catalog, MDM, and integration tooling now sit inside Salesforce and align to Data Cloud. Confirm your governance and master-data tooling remains exportable, and keep a warehouse as the neutral system of record so you are not dependent on one CRM owner for data residency.

**How does private-equity ownership affect my renewals?** Firms like Thoma Bravo and Vista buy high-retention software to exercise renewal pricing power. Expect list increases and quietly retired legacy discounts. Your best leverage is the 12 months after a deal closes, when the new owner needs clean retention figures.

**Is best-of-breed dead in 2027?** No. Focused vendors like Gong and Outreach still out-iterate suites on their core surface, which is why they keep shipping major releases. The shift is that best-of-breed now lives alongside one or two strategic anchors rather than being the whole stack.

**What is the single biggest risk RevOps faces from consolidation?** Losing data portability. When the platform owner also owns your integration and data layer, your exit cost balloons. Contractual bulk-export rights in open formats and a warehouse-as-record architecture are the two protections that matter most.

**How do I know if one of my tools is about to be acquired?** Track category leaders with 90%-plus retention and standalone scale — those are exactly what Thoma Bravo and Vista target. Map each tool's acquisition risk during your annual review so a deal announcement is a planned event, not a fire drill.

## Bottom Line

The 2027 consolidation wave is real, financed, and accelerating: **Salesforce** now owns **Informatica**, **Clari** and **Salesloft** are one company, and **Thoma Bravo** and **Vista Equity Partners** keep absorbing category leaders for their renewal pricing power. For RevOps, the danger is passive renewal into bundles that quietly raise prices and deepen lock-in. The response is active rationalization — anchor deliberately on a CRM and a data layer, keep engagement and intelligence tools swappable, land all data in a warehouse you control, demand portability in writing, and negotiate hardest in the window right after a vendor is acquired. Consolidation handled well cuts sprawl and cost; handled passively, it cedes both your budget and your data.

## Sources

- Salesforce — "Salesforce Completes Acquisition of Informatica" (Nov 18, 2025): https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2025/11/18/salesforce-completes-acquisition-of-informatica/
- Salesforce — "Salesforce Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Informatica" (May 27, 2025): https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2025/05/27/salesforce-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-informatica/
- SiliconANGLE — "Salesforce to acquire Informatica at $8B valuation": https://siliconangle.com/2025/05/27/salesforce-acquire-informatica-8b-valuation/
- CB Insights Research — "Sales tech stack consolidation is coming. So who's winning?": https://www.cbinsights.com/research/the-transcript-sales-tech-stack-consolidation/
- MaxIQ — "Clari & Salesloft Merger Explained (2026): Risks, Costs & Alternatives": https://www.getmaxiq.com/blog/clari-salesloft-merger-guide
- PitchGrade Research — "Enterprise Software M&A: Thoma Bravo, Vista, and the Buyout Playbook in 2026": https://pitchgrade.com/research/enterprise-software-ma-2026
- Yahoo Finance — "Orlando Bravo: Now's the time to buy software amid SaaS-pocalypse gloom": https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/orlando-bravo-nows-time-buy-215329518.html
- Amplemarket — "Why companies are switching from ZoomInfo (2026)": https://www.amplemarket.com/blog/why-companies-switch-from-zoominfo
- Oliv.ai — "Gong vs Clari Compared (2026)": https://www.oliv.ai/blog/gong-vs-clari
- CX Today — "Gartner Magic Quadrant for CRM Customer Engagement Center 2025: The Rundown": https://www.cxtoday.com/crm/gartner-magic-quadrant-crm-customer-engagement-center-2025/

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Free CRM · Revenue IntelligenceAudit pipeline, score reps, ship the fix Industry KPIs · SaaSThe 9 sales KPIs that matter for SaaS

Related in the library

KnowledgeHow are RevOps teams using AI to forecast revenue more accurately in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you measure marketing's revenue impact in 2027 without third-party cookies?Read →KnowledgeWhy are B2B companies shifting budget from SDR teams to AI prospecting agents in 2027?Read →KnowledgeIs product-led growth (PLG) dying in 2027, or evolving into hybrid GTM?Read →KnowledgeWhat is the state of the SaaS IPO market and IPO readiness in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you calculate ROI on a new sales tool in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you evaluate and buy RevOps software in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you consolidate an overgrown sales tech stack in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you design a RevOps tech stack in 2027?Read →KnowledgeHow do you choose a CPQ tool in 2027?Read →

What does the 2027 wave of SaaS vendor consolidation mean for RevOps tech stacks?

What does the 2027 wave of SaaS vendor consolidation mean for RevOps tech stacks?

Direct Answer

1. What is actually driving the 2027 consolidation wave

2. Platform bundle versus best-of-breed tradeoffs

3. How renewal and pricing leverage shifts

4. Integration and data-portability risk

5. Vendor lock-in and the optionality problem

6. How RevOps should rationalize the stack and protect optionality

FAQ

Bottom Line

Sources

What does the score mean?