How do you compensate for product-led trials that an SDR sourced but an AE closed — full credit to whom?
Direct Answer
Split credit between sourcer and closer via blended commission: SDR gets 40-50% of first-deal value (acquisition), AE gets 100% recurring. Prevents SDR-AE friction and aligns both roles to retention, not just signature.
Operator Detail
Product-led trials create attribution chaos. An SDR may have sourced the account, but if the prospect self-onboarded and the AE only closed a buying committee, the sourcer feels invisible. Standard practice fails here.
Best approach:
- SDR compensation: 40-50% of first-deal commission (one-time) for sourcing credit
- AE compensation: 100% of recurring/expansion revenue + full first-deal commission if they built the buying committee
- Trigger: SDR credit fires on *sourced* + *trial signup*, not on close
- Avoid: 50/50 splits (creates false parity) or full credit to closer (demoralizes sourcing)
Vendors with strong comp models:
- Pavilion publishes sourcing-to-close splits in their GTM benchmarks
- Bridge Group data shows Gartner teams use 35-45% splits for product-sourced deals
- Sandler Training documents trial-stage compensation as distinct from traditional sales cycles
Why it works:
- SDR stays engaged post-trial (reduces churn on cheap deals)
- AE doesn't penalize product-sourced deals vs. fully-sourced accounts
- Accounting clean: one comp code per stage
Mermaid flowchart:
TAGS: product-led-trials,comp-split,sdr-ae-alignment,sourcing-credit,first-deal-commission