Pulse ← Trainings
Sales Trainings · sales-training

AI Coding Tools Selling to the VP of Engineering — 60-Min Training

👁 0 views📖 345 words⏱ 2 min read5/31/2026

Direct Answer

AI Coding Tools Selling to the VP of Engineering is a 60-minute training for AEs running $40K–$2M ACV cycles against Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Anthropic Claude Code, Cline, Cognition Devin, Aider, Windsurf, Tabnine. Qualify against VP Eng + Director of Platform Eng + CFO, run discovery on dev adoption + PR acceptance + IDE coverage + agentic mode.

Built on MEDDPICC.


Section 1 — Why AI Coding Tools Selling Is Different (5 min)

Developer adoption drives enterprise revenue. Devs revolt against bad suggestions.

End with Mark Roberge's rule: *"Sell PR acceptance rate, not lines of code."*


Section 2 — The 60-Minute Discovery (15 min)

  1. Opening (3 min): "Current AI coding deployment? Cursor, Copilot, none?"
  2. Dev count + IDE mix (10 min): "VS Code, JetBrains, Vim split?"
  3. PR acceptance baseline (10 min): "Current AI suggestion acceptance %?"
  4. Agentic mode adoption (10 min): "Multi-step autonomous coding?"
  5. Language + framework coverage (8 min): "All your stacks covered?"
  6. Security review status (7 min): "Code suggestions audited for vulnerabilities?"
  7. Renewal posture (5 min): "Existing contracts?"
flowchart TD A[AE Discovery] --> B[Pre-Brief] B --> C{VP Eng + Director + CFO?} C -->|No| D[Reschedule] C -->|Yes| E[Dev Count + IDE 20 min] E --> F[PR Acceptance + Agentic 18 min] F --> G[Coverage + Renewal 12 min] G --> H[Trial 7 Days]

Section 3 — The Trial That Wins (15 min)

100+ dev seats trialed. PR acceptance scorecard mid-trial. Agentic mode demo on customer repo.


Section 4 — Handling the Incumbent (10 min)

Cursor wedge (agentic IDE). Claude Code wedge (terminal). Devin wedge (autonomous). GitHub Copilot wedge (bundled).


Section 5 — Pricing Conversation (10 min)

Per-seat pricing standard. Multi-year discount 12–18%. No procurement-only.

flowchart TD A[Joint VP Eng + Director + CFO] --> B[Per-Seat Proposal] B --> C{Discount?} C -->|Yes| D[MSA] D --> E{Procurement Solo?} E -->|Yes| F[Refuse] E -->|No| G[Joint Neg] F --> G G --> H[Onboarding 7 Days] H --> I[PR Acceptance Tracking Month 1] I --> J[Quarterly Adoption Review]

Section 6 — Renewal Trap-Set Month 12 (5 min)

PR acceptance 40%+, dev adoption 80%+, agentic mode adoption 40%+, joint VP Eng dashboard.


FAQ

Cursor or Copilot? Cursor AI-native; Copilot bundled. Claude Code competitive? Yes for terminal. Devin worth price? For autonomous tasks. Agentic mode mandatory? Yes in 2027. Multi-IDE required? Yes.

Sources

Keep reading
Download:
Was this helpful?  
Related in the library
More from the library
graphic · linkedin-bannerLLM Builder AI Engineer — LinkedIn Bannerrevops · current-events-2027What does GPU infrastructure for AI workloads look like in 2027?sales-training · sales-meetingAPI Security Selling to the Head of Platform Engineering — 60-Min Trainingtech-stack · revops-toolsWhat is the recommended AI Observability Platform sales and operations tech stack in 2027?tech-stack · revops-toolsWhat is the recommended SIEM Vendor sales and operations tech stack in 2027?graphic · linkedin-bannerTTS Voice AI Engineer — LinkedIn Bannertech-stack · revops-toolsWhat is the recommended Incident Response (IR) Firm sales and operations tech stack in 2027?graphic · linkedin-bannerDocument Intelligence AI Engineer — LinkedIn Bannertech-stack · revops-toolsWhat is the recommended Computer Vision API sales and operations tech stack in 2027?graphic · linkedin-bannerSynthetic Data Generator — LinkedIn Bannersales-training · sales-meetingZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access) Selling to the Network Architect — 60-Min Traininggraphic · mindset-quote-bannerNRR Beats New Logos — Revenue Law Bannertech-stack · revops-toolsWhat is the recommended Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Vendor sales and operations tech stack in 2027?