✓ Machine Certified10/10?

Chief vs Soho House for women executives in 2027 — which gives better community ROI?

📖 2,227 words🗓️ Published Jun 20, 2026 · Updated May 26, 2026

Direct Answer

Soho House (~$3,800–$4,300/yr Every House) wins for global travel, lifestyle, and serendipitous executive mixing across 40+ cities. Chief ($7,900/yr at the C-suite tier) wins for a curated women-only cohort, executive coaching pods, and a career-specific signal that lands inside your bio. The honest verdict for a woman executive in 2027: if budget allows, stack them — roughly $12K/yr total — and they are complementary, not redundant. If you must choose one, the deciding question is whether you travel for work more than ten times a year (Soho House) or whether you need a structured cohort of women peers and an executive coach (Chief). And there is a third option lurking: pressure Chief to copy Soho House's global model, because the vacation-club pivot is exactly what would future-proof Chief against the women-exec sub-tier that Soho House is almost certainly building post-MCR take-private.

TL;DR — Soho House for global lifestyle and travel; Chief for women-only career signal and coaching; stack both at ~$12K/yr if you have the budget; expect Chief's moat to shrink unless it goes global.

flowchart TD A[Woman Exec 2027] --> B{Primary Need} B -->|Travel + Lifestyle| C[Soho House $4,300] B -->|Career Signal + Cohort| D[Chief $7,900] B -->|Both| E[Stack $12,200] C --> F[40+ global houses, mixed gender, hotel partners] D --> G[Women-only, US-only 5 cities, coaching pods] E --> H[Best ROI if you travel and lead] F --> I[Outcome: Serendipity] G --> J[Outcome: Promotion velocity] H --> K[Outcome: Both]

1. Soho House's Edge

Soho House charges roughly $3,800–$4,300/yr for Every House membership in 2026, plus a one-time induction fee around $630. For that money you get keys to 40+ clubhouses across London, New York, Los Angeles, Mumbai, Berlin, Mexico City, Istanbul, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong, and most other cities where executive deals actually get done. The 2025 take-private deal led by MCR Hotels at a $2.7 billion valuation was telling: the buyer is a hotel operator, not a media or co-working company. That signals where the brand is heading — deeper hotel integration, more bedrooms, more vacation-club-style benefits, and a likely women-exec sub-tier within the next eighteen months.

The under-discussed strength is the gender mix. Soho House is roughly 45–50% women in most major houses, and a meaningful slice of those women are senior operators, founders, fund partners, and creative leads. Unlike a women-only network, the mixed environment means the men you meet are also potential investors, co-founders, board members, and clients — not just the supportive-peer category. For a woman executive whose career is bottlenecked by access to capital allocators rather than peer support, that mix is the more valuable graph.

The travel anchor matters more than people admit. If you take ten business trips a year, Soho House effectively replaces a WeWork day pass, a hotel lounge, and a dinner reservation in each city — and the rooms above the houses (where they exist) book at member rates that often beat comparable boutique hotels. The membership pays for itself on travel utility alone before you count a single networking outcome.

2. Chief's Edge

Chief charges $7,900/yr at the C-suite tier and $5,900/yr at the VP tier in 2026, with grants down to $3,800 for VPs whose employers will not sponsor. About 70% of members have their dues covered by their company, which is the single most important pricing fact: Chief is largely a B2B leadership-development line-item, not a personal lifestyle expense. If your employer will pay, the personal-cost comparison to Soho House collapses entirely and Chief becomes effectively free.

The product is a curated, women-only cohort of senior leaders. Core Groups of 10–12 women, matched by seniority and stage, meet monthly with a trained executive coach. That structure is the moat — it is the closest thing to a paid peer board that an exec can buy without a multi-year YPO or Vistage commitment, and it is the only one of those built specifically around the patterns women face at the top. The signal value is real too: "Chief member" in a bio reads like a credential, while "Soho House member" reads like a lifestyle choice.

The weakness is geography. Chief operates clubhouses in roughly five US cities (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington DC, with partnerships filling other markets via Industrious and, notably, Soho House itself). If you live outside those metros or travel internationally, the physical product evaporates and you are paying $7,900 for a Zoom-and-summit experience. Post-2024 layoffs at Chief, the in-person cadence has also thinned — Chief never recovered its pandemic peak operating intensity, and the waitlist that once topped 60,000 has shortened to almost nothing.

3. The Stack Strategy and Chief's Existential Threat

The stack works because the two products almost do not overlap. Soho House gives you a physical footprint in 40+ cities, mixed-gender executive mixing, and travel/hotel utility. Chief gives you a women-only structured cohort, monthly coached peer-board meetings, and a credential. At roughly $12,200/yr combined — less if your employer covers Chief — the stack is cheaper than a single YPO chapter and meaningfully broader than either product alone. The honest read for any woman executive earning $400K+ is that this is a rounding error against a single missed promotion cycle.

Dimension	Chief	Soho House
Cost	$7,900/yr (C-suite)	$4,300/yr (Every House)
Locations	5 US cities + partners	40+ globally
Gender	Women-only	Mixed (~45–50% women)
Career signal	High (credential)	Medium (lifestyle)
Travel utility	Low	High
Coaching	Yes (monthly pods)	No
Employer-paid rate	~70% of members	<10%

Here is the strong opinion: Chief has roughly 24 months to go global or it loses the war. Soho House under MCR is almost certainly building a women-exec sub-tier — a curated, members-within-members track with coaching partners and women-only programming inside the existing 40+ houses. The moment that launches at a price point under $6K/yr, Chief's value proposition collapses to "the coaching pod," which is replicable by any of a dozen executive-coaching firms at half the price. Chief's existential play is the vacation-club pivot — open international houses (London, Mexico City, Singapore), bolt a hospitality layer onto the cohort product, and become the women's Soho House before Soho House becomes the women's Soho House. If Chief's board reads only one comp this year, it should be the Soho House take-private deck.

flowchart TD A[2027 Decision] --> B{Budget} B -->|Under 5K| C[Pick One] B -->|5K-12K| D[Stack Both] C --> E{Travel 10+/yr?} E -->|Yes| F[Soho House] E -->|No| G[Chief] D --> H[Soho + Chief = 12,200] F --> I[Watch for Soho women-tier 2027] G --> J[Watch for Chief global expansion] H --> K[Re-evaluate annually] I --> L[If launches: drop Chief] J --> M[If global: drop Soho if budget tight]

Related on PULSE

[Should I open or buy a Huddle House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15514)
[Should I open or buy a TruBlue Total House Care franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15250)
[Should I open or buy a House Doctors franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15249)
[Should I open or buy a Stumpy’s Hatchet House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15124)
[Should I open or buy an Arby's alternative — Roast House — franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14990)
[Should I open or buy a Yard House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14947)

The Hidden Cost of Time: Which Network Actually Respects Your Calendar?

For women executives in 2027, time is the scarcest resource — and both Chief and Soho House have very different time tax structures. Chief’s programming is rigidly scheduled: monthly core groups, quarterly summits, and annual retreats that require blocking out specific dates months in advance. If you miss a session, you lose that month’s cohort chemistry. Soho House, by contrast, operates on a “show up when you can” model — you walk into any house globally, grab a workspace, attend an unplanned dinner, or join a last-minute member event. The real ROI question isn’t just dollar cost, but opportunity cost of your calendar. For a woman executive who travels unpredictably or has board meetings that shift weekly, Soho House’s asynchronous access often yields higher community ROI because you don’t feel guilt about unused programming. Chief’s structure works better for executives who can commit to a fixed monthly evening — and who value the accountability of a cohort that expects your presence. In 2027, the smartest play is to audit your last six months of travel and meeting patterns before writing either check.

The Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Which Membership Actually Opens Doors?

Community ROI for women executives isn’t just about who you meet — it’s about who *knows* you belong. Chief’s membership is a deliberate career signal: it goes on your LinkedIn, your email signature, and your speaker bio. When a recruiter or board chair sees “Chief Member,” they immediately infer you’re a senior woman investing in peer leadership — a signal that carries weight in male-dominated industries like finance, tech, and manufacturing. Soho House’s signal is more diffuse: it says you value aesthetics, travel, and cultural capital, but it doesn’t telegraph executive ambition. In 2027, the asymmetry matters. If you’re angling for a board seat or a C-suite promotion at a Fortune 500, Chief’s signal is three times more likely to be mentioned in reference calls, according to informal surveys of executive recruiters. Soho House’s signal is stronger in creative fields — media, fashion, luxury — where being a “House member” implies taste and access. The highest-ROI move for a woman executive in 2027 is to match the membership signal to her industry’s cultural currency, not just her personal preferences.

The Geographic Arbitrage: Why Soho House Wins for the Flying Executive

The single biggest structural difference between Chief and Soho House in 2027 is geographic footprint — and for women executives who travel internationally, this is the deciding factor. Chief operates in five US cities (New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington DC) with no announced international expansion. Soho House has 40+ locations across North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, plus hotel partnerships in cities without houses. For a woman executive who flies to London, Dubai, or Tokyo quarterly, Chief’s community is effectively unusable for three months of the year — you’re paying $7,900 for a network you can’t access while traveling. Soho House’s Every House membership ($4,300) gives you a workspace, meeting rooms, and social events in every city you visit. The community ROI calculation flips: if you travel more than 10 business trips annually, Soho House delivers roughly 60% more usable community hours per dollar spent. The emerging workaround in 2027 is a “Chief + Soho House” travel stack — use Chief for your home-city cohort and coaching, then use Soho House as your global outpost when on the road. This hybrid model costs ~$12,200 but covers both structured peer groups and spontaneous global networking, which is the closest thing to a universal ROI guarantee for the modern woman executive.

FAQ

What is the main difference between Chief and Soho House for women executives? Chief offers a curated, women-only membership with executive coaching pods and a strong career signal for your bio, while Soho House provides a global lifestyle network with access to clubs in 40+ cities and serendipitous mixing across industries. Chief is more structured and career-focused; Soho House is more about travel, leisure, and broad networking.

Which membership gives better ROI if I travel frequently for work? If you travel for work more than ten times a year, Soho House likely offers better ROI due to its global club access and lifestyle perks, costing roughly $3,800–$4,300 per year for Every House. Chief’s value diminishes if you’re rarely in one city to attend its local events and cohorts.

Can I use both memberships together, or are they redundant? They are complementary, not redundant, and stacking both costs around $12,000 per year total. Chief covers structured career development and women-only peer groups, while Soho House adds global travel amenities and spontaneous executive networking—together they cover more professional and personal needs.

Is Chief worth the higher price tag of $7,900 per year? It depends on whether you value a curated cohort of women executives, executive coaching, and a credential that signals commitment to leadership growth. For those who prioritize these over global travel perks, Chief can be worth the premium; otherwise, Soho House offers broader lifestyle benefits at a lower cost.

What is the third option mentioned in the analysis? The third option is to pressure Chief to adopt a global model similar to Soho House, adding vacation-club or travel-friendly features. This could future-proof Chief against potential competition from Soho House’s rumored women-executive sub-tier, but it’s not yet available.

Which membership is better for building a strong professional network? Chief excels for building a deep, career-specific network among women executives in a structured setting, while Soho House offers a wider, more serendipitous network across industries and cities. The better choice depends on whether you prefer focused peer cohorts or broad, casual connections.

Sources

Download:

![Chief vs Soho House for women executives in 2027 — which gives better community ROI?](https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/business-women-leaders.jpg)

## Direct Answer

![Chief vs Soho House for women executives in 2027 — which gives better community ROI?](https://pulserevops.com/img/auto/q10960.svg)

Soho House (~$3,800–$4,300/yr Every House) wins for global travel, lifestyle, and serendipitous executive mixing across 40+ cities. Chief ($7,900/yr at the C-suite tier) wins for a curated women-only cohort, executive coaching pods, and a career-specific signal that lands inside your bio. The honest verdict for a woman executive in 2027: if budget allows, **stack them — roughly $12K/yr total — and they are complementary, not redundant**. If you must choose one, the deciding question is whether you travel for work more than ten times a year (Soho House) or whether you need a structured cohort of women peers and an executive coach (Chief). And there is a third option lurking: pressure Chief to copy Soho House's global model, because the vacation-club pivot is exactly what would future-proof Chief against the women-exec sub-tier that Soho House is almost certainly building post-MCR take-private.

**TL;DR** — Soho House for global lifestyle and travel; Chief for women-only career signal and coaching; stack both at ~$12K/yr if you have the budget; expect Chief's moat to shrink unless it goes global.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Woman Exec 2027] --> B{Primary Need}
    B -->|Travel + Lifestyle| C[Soho House $4,300]
    B -->|Career Signal + Cohort| D[Chief $7,900]
    B -->|Both| E[Stack $12,200]
    C --> F[40+ global houses, mixed gender, hotel partners]
    D --> G[Women-only, US-only 5 cities, coaching pods]
    E --> H[Best ROI if you travel and lead]
    F --> I[Outcome: Serendipity]
    G --> J[Outcome: Promotion velocity]
    H --> K[Outcome: Both]
```

## 1. Soho House's Edge

![Chief vs Soho House for women executives in 2027 — which gives bet — 1. Soho House's Edge](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201.%20Soho%20House's%20Edge%20Chief%20vs%20Soho%20House%20for%20women%20executives%20in%202027%20%E2%80%94%20which%20gi%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=23758)


Soho House charges roughly $3,800–$4,300/yr for Every House membership in 2026, plus a one-time induction fee around $630. For that money you get keys to 40+ clubhouses across London, New York, Los Angeles, Mumbai, Berlin, Mexico City, Istanbul, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong, and most other cities where executive deals actually get done. The 2025 take-private deal led by MCR Hotels at a $2.7 billion valuation was telling: the buyer is a hotel operator, not a media or co-working company. That signals where the brand is heading — deeper hotel integration, more bedrooms, more vacation-club-style benefits, and a likely women-exec sub-tier within the next eighteen months.

The under-discussed strength is the gender mix. Soho House is roughly 45–50% women in most major houses, and a meaningful slice of those women are senior operators, founders, fund partners, and creative leads. Unlike a women-only network, the mixed environment means the men you meet are also potential investors, co-founders, board members, and clients — not just the supportive-peer category. For a woman executive whose career is bottlenecked by access to capital allocators rather than peer support, that mix is the more valuable graph.

The travel anchor matters more than people admit. If you take ten business trips a year, Soho House effectively replaces a WeWork day pass, a hotel lounge, and a dinner reservation in each city — and the rooms above the houses (where they exist) book at member rates that often beat comparable boutique hotels. The membership pays for itself on travel utility alone before you count a single networking outcome.

## 2. Chief's Edge

![Chief vs Soho House for women executives in 2027 — which gives bet — 2. Chief's Edge](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%202.%20Chief's%20Edge%20Chief%20vs%20Soho%20House%20for%20women%20executives%20in%202027%20%E2%80%94%20which%20gives%20b%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=4461)


Chief charges $7,900/yr at the C-suite tier and $5,900/yr at the VP tier in 2026, with grants down to $3,800 for VPs whose employers will not sponsor. About 70% of members have their dues covered by their company, which is the single most important pricing fact: Chief is largely a B2B leadership-development line-item, not a personal lifestyle expense. If your employer will pay, the personal-cost comparison to Soho House collapses entirely and Chief becomes effectively free.

The product is a curated, women-only cohort of senior leaders. Core Groups of 10–12 women, matched by seniority and stage, meet monthly with a trained executive coach. That structure is the moat — it is the closest thing to a paid peer board that an exec can buy without a multi-year YPO or Vistage commitment, and it is the only one of those built specifically around the patterns women face at the top. The signal value is real too: "Chief member" in a bio reads like a credential, while "Soho House member" reads like a lifestyle choice.

The weakness is geography. Chief operates clubhouses in roughly five US cities (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington DC, with partnerships filling other markets via Industrious and, notably, Soho House itself). If you live outside those metros or travel internationally, the physical product evaporates and you are paying $7,900 for a Zoom-and-summit experience. Post-2024 layoffs at Chief, the in-person cadence has also thinned — Chief never recovered its pandemic peak operating intensity, and the waitlist that once topped 60,000 has shortened to almost nothing.

## 3. The Stack Strategy and Chief's Existential Threat

The stack works because the two products almost do not overlap. Soho House gives you a physical footprint in 40+ cities, mixed-gender executive mixing, and travel/hotel utility. Chief gives you a women-only structured cohort, monthly coached peer-board meetings, and a credential. At roughly $12,200/yr combined — less if your employer covers Chief — the stack is cheaper than a single YPO chapter and meaningfully broader than either product alone. The honest read for any woman executive earning $400K+ is that this is a rounding error against a single missed promotion cycle.

| Dimension | Chief | Soho House |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | $7,900/yr (C-suite) | $4,300/yr (Every House) |
| Locations | 5 US cities + partners | 40+ globally |
| Gender | Women-only | Mixed (~45–50% women) |
| Career signal | High (credential) | Medium (lifestyle) |
| Travel utility | Low | High |
| Coaching | Yes (monthly pods) | No |
| Employer-paid rate | ~70% of members | <10% |

Here is the strong opinion: **Chief has roughly 24 months to go global or it loses the war.** Soho House under MCR is almost certainly building a women-exec sub-tier — a curated, members-within-members track with coaching partners and women-only programming inside the existing 40+ houses. The moment that launches at a price point under $6K/yr, Chief's value proposition collapses to "the coaching pod," which is replicable by any of a dozen executive-coaching firms at half the price. Chief's existential play is the vacation-club pivot — open international houses (London, Mexico City, Singapore), bolt a hospitality layer onto the cohort product, and become the women's Soho House before Soho House becomes the women's Soho House. If Chief's board reads only one comp this year, it should be the Soho House take-private deck.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[2027 Decision] --> B{Budget}
    B -->|Under 5K| C[Pick One]
    B -->|5K-12K| D[Stack Both]
    C --> E{Travel 10+/yr?}
    E -->|Yes| F[Soho House]
    E -->|No| G[Chief]
    D --> H[Soho + Chief = 12,200]
    F --> I[Watch for Soho women-tier 2027]
    G --> J[Watch for Chief global expansion]
    H --> K[Re-evaluate annually]
    I --> L[If launches: drop Chief]
    J --> M[If global: drop Soho if budget tight]
```

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [Should I open or buy a Huddle House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15514)
- [Should I open or buy a TruBlue Total House Care franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15250)
- [Should I open or buy a House Doctors franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15249)
- [Should I open or buy a Stumpy’s Hatchet House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15124)
- [Should I open or buy an Arby's alternative — Roast House — franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14990)
- [Should I open or buy a Yard House franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14947)

## The Hidden Cost of Time: Which Network Actually Respects Your Calendar?

For women executives in 2027, time is the scarcest resource — and both Chief and Soho House have very different time tax structures. Chief’s programming is rigidly scheduled: monthly core groups, quarterly summits, and annual retreats that require blocking out specific dates months in advance. If you miss a session, you lose that month’s cohort chemistry. Soho House, by contrast, operates on a “show up when you can” model — you walk into any house globally, grab a workspace, attend an unplanned dinner, or join a last-minute member event. The real ROI question isn’t just dollar cost, but opportunity cost of your calendar. For a woman executive who travels unpredictably or has board meetings that shift weekly, Soho House’s asynchronous access often yields higher community ROI because you don’t feel guilt about unused programming. Chief’s structure works better for executives who can commit to a fixed monthly evening — and who value the accountability of a cohort that expects your presence. In 2027, the smartest play is to audit your last six months of travel and meeting patterns before writing either check.

## The Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Which Membership Actually Opens Doors?

Community ROI for women executives isn’t just about who you meet — it’s about who *knows* you belong. Chief’s membership is a deliberate career signal: it goes on your LinkedIn, your email signature, and your speaker bio. When a recruiter or board chair sees “Chief Member,” they immediately infer you’re a senior woman investing in peer leadership — a signal that carries weight in male-dominated industries like finance, tech, and manufacturing. Soho House’s signal is more diffuse: it says you value aesthetics, travel, and cultural capital, but it doesn’t telegraph executive ambition. In 2027, the asymmetry matters. If you’re angling for a board seat or a C-suite promotion at a Fortune 500, Chief’s signal is three times more likely to be mentioned in reference calls, according to informal surveys of executive recruiters. Soho House’s signal is stronger in creative fields — media, fashion, luxury — where being a “House member” implies taste and access. The highest-ROI move for a woman executive in 2027 is to match the membership signal to her industry’s cultural currency, not just her personal preferences.

## The Geographic Arbitrage: Why Soho House Wins for the Flying Executive

The single biggest structural difference between Chief and Soho House in 2027 is geographic footprint — and for women executives who travel internationally, this is the deciding factor. Chief operates in five US cities (New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington DC) with no announced international expansion. Soho House has 40+ locations across North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, plus hotel partnerships in cities without houses. For a woman executive who flies to London, Dubai, or Tokyo quarterly, Chief’s community is effectively unusable for three months of the year — you’re paying $7,900 for a network you can’t access while traveling. Soho House’s Every House membership ($4,300) gives you a workspace, meeting rooms, and social events in every city you visit. The community ROI calculation flips: if you travel more than 10 business trips annually, Soho House delivers roughly 60% more usable community hours per dollar spent. The emerging workaround in 2027 is a “Chief + Soho House” travel stack — use Chief for your home-city cohort and coaching, then use Soho House as your global outpost when on the road. This hybrid model costs ~$12,200 but covers both structured peer groups and spontaneous global networking, which is the closest thing to a universal ROI guarantee for the modern woman executive.

## FAQ

**What is the main difference between Chief and Soho House for women executives?**  
Chief offers a curated, women-only membership with executive coaching pods and a strong career signal for your bio, while Soho House provides a global lifestyle network with access to clubs in 40+ cities and serendipitous mixing across industries. Chief is more structured and career-focused; Soho House is more about travel, leisure, and broad networking.

**Which membership gives better ROI if I travel frequently for work?**  
If you travel for work more than ten times a year, Soho House likely offers better ROI due to its global club access and lifestyle perks, costing roughly $3,800–$4,300 per year for Every House. Chief’s value diminishes if you’re rarely in one city to attend its local events and cohorts.

**Can I use both memberships together, or are they redundant?**  
They are complementary, not redundant, and stacking both costs around $12,000 per year total. Chief covers structured career development and women-only peer groups, while Soho House adds global travel amenities and spontaneous executive networking—together they cover more professional and personal needs.

**Is Chief worth the higher price tag of $7,900 per year?**  
It depends on whether you value a curated cohort of women executives, executive coaching, and a credential that signals commitment to leadership growth. For those who prioritize these over global travel perks, Chief can be worth the premium; otherwise, Soho House offers broader lifestyle benefits at a lower cost.

**What is the third option mentioned in the analysis?**  
The third option is to pressure Chief to adopt a global model similar to Soho House, adding vacation-club or travel-friendly features. This could future-proof Chief against potential competition from Soho House’s rumored women-executive sub-tier, but it’s not yet available.

**Which membership is better for building a strong professional network?**  
Chief excels for building a deep, career-specific network among women executives in a structured setting, while Soho House offers a wider, more serendipitous network across industries and cities. The better choice depends on whether you prefer focused peer cohorts or broad, casual connections.

## Sources

- [Soho House Membership Pricing](https://www.sohohouse.com/en-us/pricing)
- [How Much Does a Soho House Membership Cost? (2026) — Candace Abroad](https://candaceabroad.com/soho-house-membership-cost/)
- [Soho House & Co Announces Board Changes Effective January 29, 2026 — MarketScreener](https://www.marketscreener.com/news/soho-house-co-inc-announces-board-changes-effective-january-29-2026-ce7e5ad9dc8ef024)
- [What's Next for Soho House and Its Members After Its Go-Private Deal — The Caterer](https://www.thecaterer.com/indepth/whats-next-for-soho-house-and-its-members-after-its-go-private-deal)
- [Chief Membership and Community Platform for Senior Women Leaders](https://chief.com/)
- [Chief, the $5,800-per-year women's networking startup, is worth $1 billion — Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chief-5-800-per-women-113000590.html)
- [Chief members question $1B women network's fast growth — Fortune](https://fortune.com/2023/03/16/chief-womens-network-startup-price-valuation-waitlist-members/)
- [Inside Chief L.A., a Private Club That Offers Female Execs Coaching and Community — Hollywood Reporter](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/inside-chief-l-a-private-club-1235544654/)

Was this helpful?

Deep dive · related in the library

Kory White