What's the right cadence and structure for sales 1-on-1s in a remote-first 2027 team?

👁 0 views📖 2,435 words⏱ 11 min read5/28/2026

Direct Answer

Run a protected weekly 30-45 minute 1-on-1 per rep that you never cancel, structured around the rep's agenda first, then a quota and pipeline pulse, deep coaching on one or two live deals (not a status update), and one focus skill. In remote-first teams, open with a genuine personal check-in, keep video on, and use a shared running doc for action items.

Vary the agenda week to week so it does not collapse into a forecast call. In 2027, let AI prepare the brief — current metrics, at-risk deals, and coaching moments pulled from call analytics in Gong or Chorus — so your live time goes to judgment and motivation, not data recitation.

Adjust frequency by tenure: ramping reps get two touches a week or daily check-ins, tenured A-players get a lighter weekly rhythm, and struggling reps get more structure tied to a performance plan. Track completion rate (target 95 percent or higher), how often the rep drives the agenda, and action-item follow-through.

Gallup research links regular manager 1-on-1s to roughly three times higher engagement, which is why this single ritual outperforms almost any tooling investment a remote sales org can make.

1. Why 1-on-1s matter more in remote-first sales

The 1-on-1 is the core management ritual, and remote-first work amplifies its importance rather than reducing it. In a physical office a sales manager picks up dozens of micro-signals for free: the rep who looks deflated after a lost call, the hallway question about pricing, the overheard objection a teammate just fumbled.

Distributed teams lose all of that ambient coaching. The 1-on-1 becomes the deliberate replacement for the hallway, and when it disappears so does most of the coaching a rep ever receives.

Companies that built strong remote cultures — Salesforce and HubSpot among them — treat the recurring 1-on-1 as the load-bearing column of management, not an optional check-in. Performance platforms like Lattice, Culture Amp, and 15Five exist precisely because organizations realized that manager conversations, captured and followed up consistently, drive retention and quota attainment more reliably than any new incentive plan.

Gallup has spent years documenting the same effect: employees who get regular, meaningful manager attention engage at roughly three times the rate of those who do not.

For a sales team the stakes are sharper than for most functions. Reps live on a quarterly clock, carry public numbers, and ride an emotional cycle that swings with every deal. A skipped 1-on-1 is not a neutral event.

It quietly tells the rep that the manager is busy with something more important, and on a remote team where that manager is already a face on a screen, the signal lands hard.

2. The right cadence (and never cancelling)

The default cadence is a weekly 1-on-1 with every direct report, 30 to 45 minutes, on a recurring calendar hold. That weekly rhythm is the baseline that practitioners at the Sales Management Association and methodology shops like Winning by Design consistently recommend, because it matches the natural cycle of a sales week without becoming a burden.

Around that weekly anchor sit a few lighter-weight rituals so the 1-on-1 does not have to carry everything. Async deal reviews handle the rep's individual opportunities between meetings. A separate team pipeline review covers forecast and stage hygiene so the 1-on-1 does not degrade into a CRM walkthrough.

Skip-level conversations, where a second-line leader meets directly with reps, run monthly or quarterly to surface what is not making it up the chain.

The single most important cadence rule is this: do not cancel 1-on-1s. Reschedule if you genuinely must, but treat cancellation as nearly forbidden. When a manager bumps a 1-on-1 for a pipeline call or a customer escalation, the rep correctly reads the priority order. Protecting the meeting is the cheapest, highest-trust signal a remote manager can send, and protecting it 95 percent of the time is a measurable behavior, not a vague intention.

3. The structure of a high-value sales 1-on-1

A good sales 1-on-1 follows a consistent arc, even as the emphasis shifts week to week. Open with a personal check-in of about five minutes. This is rapport, not theater, and it matters far more remotely than it did in an office where small talk happened naturally. Skipping it to "get to business" is a frequent mistake on distributed teams.

Let the rep drive the agenda next. Their topics come first, before yours. A 1-on-1 is fundamentally the rep's meeting, and surfacing their concerns early changes the entire tone from inspection to support. Then move into a quick number review: quota pace, pipeline health, and whether coverage is sufficient for the quarter.

Keep this tight, because it is the part most likely to swell and crowd out coaching.

The center of gravity should be deal coaching on one or two opportunities, going deep rather than wide. Pick a deal that is stuck, large, or instructive, and actually coach it — interrogate the next step, the economic buyer, the competitive risk. After that, spend time on one focus skill the rep is developing, whether discovery questioning, multithreading, or negotiation.

Close with blockers and asks, where the rep names what is in their way, and finish with explicit action items and accountability so the conversation produces commitments rather than just talk.

flowchart TD A[Personal check-in ~5 min] --> B[Rep-driven agenda first] B --> C[Number review: quota pace + pipeline health] C --> D[Deal coaching: 1-2 deals deep] D --> E[Skill development: one focus skill] E --> F[Blockers and asks] F --> G[Action items + accountability] G --> H[Logged in shared running doc]

4. Deal coaching vs. Status updates

The difference between a valuable 1-on-1 and a wasted one usually comes down to whether the manager is coaching or merely collecting status. A pure pipeline status update is a CRM report, not a conversation. If the entire meeting is the rep reciting stage and close date for every open deal, that information already lives in Salesforce or HubSpot and the live time added nothing.

Coaching looks different. It picks one or two deals and digs into the reasoning: who is the real decision maker, what is the compelling event, where is the deal actually at risk, and what specific next step moves it forward. The manager asks more than they tell.

A manager who talks 80 percent of the time is lecturing, not coaching, and on a remote call that imbalance is even easier to fall into because silence feels more awkward over video.

Two more failure patterns undermine deal coaching. The first is no follow-through on action items — commitments made and then never revisited teach the rep that the meeting does not matter. The second is running the same agenda every single week. A high-functioning manager varies the emphasis: deal coaching one week, a skill deep-dive the next, a career and development conversation after that.

Rotating the focus keeps the meeting from calcifying into a forecast ritual.

5. Remote-specific practices

Distributed teams need a handful of deliberate practices to make 1-on-1s land. Keep video on and remove distractions on both sides; a camera-off, half-attention 1-on-1 communicates disengagement no matter what words are spoken. Maintain a shared running document — many teams use Fellow.app, Hypercontext, or a simple shared doc — that holds the rolling agenda, notes, and action items so nothing depends on memory and either party can prepare ahead of time.

Push routine information into async pre-work. The rep updates the CRM and writes short deal notes before the meeting, so live time is not consumed by data entry the rep could have done alone. This is the single highest-leverage change most remote managers can make.

Finally, lean on call recordings to compress live time. Tools like Gong and Chorus capture every customer conversation, and a manager can review a flagged call asynchronously rather than asking the rep to narrate it from memory. That shifts the 1-on-1 from "tell me what happened" to "I watched the demo, let us talk about the moment the buyer went quiet," which is a categorically better use of synchronous time.

6. How AI preps the 1-on-1 in 2027

By 2027 the most visible change is that AI prepares the 1-on-1 brief. Instead of the manager assembling metrics by hand, the system generates a pre-read containing the rep's quota pace, pipeline movement since last week, deals that have gone quiet, and specific coaching moments surfaced from call analytics.

Korn Ferry and other advisory firms now frame this as the manager's standing prep layer rather than a novelty.

The analytics engines built on Gong and Chorus data flag coaching opportunities automatically — an unbalanced talk-to-listen ratio, a missing next step after a key call, a discovery conversation that skipped budget. The AI does not coach; it points the manager at the exact moments worth coaching, which is the hard part of preparation that managers rarely have time to do well.

The result is a cleaner division of labor. AI handles data preparation, and the manager spends live time on judgment and motivation. A human still has to interpret why a strong rep suddenly went cautious, decide whether a stalled deal is worth more effort, and rebuild the confidence of someone in a slump.

That work does not automate, and pushing the mechanical prep to software is what finally creates room for it.

flowchart TD A[New rep ramping?] -->|Yes| B[2x per week or daily check-ins] A -->|No| C[Tenured A-player?] C -->|Yes| D[Weekly, lighter touch] C -->|No| E[Struggling / off-plan?] E -->|Yes| F[More frequent + structured PIP cadence] E -->|No| G[Standard weekly 30-45 min]

7. Adjusting cadence by rep tenure

One cadence does not fit every rep. New reps who are still ramping need more contact — twice a week or even brief daily check-ins during onboarding — because the cost of a bad habit forming early is high and the rep has not yet built independent judgment. The extra touches taper as competence grows.

Tenured A-players earn a lighter weekly rhythm. They still get a protected 1-on-1, but it leans toward strategy, career growth, and the occasional hard deal rather than close inspection. Over-managing a top performer is its own failure mode; the meeting should feel like a resource, not surveillance.

Struggling reps need the opposite: more frequency and more structure, often tied to a formal performance plan with explicit, dated milestones. The cadence here is deliberately tighter so that progress (or its absence) becomes visible quickly and fairly. The point is documentation and genuine support, not a paper trail for its own sake.

8. Metrics and common mistakes

A few metrics tell you whether the 1-on-1 program is healthy. The 1-on-1 completion rate should sit at 95 percent or higher — the share of scheduled meetings actually held rather than cancelled. The rep-driven agenda percentage, how often the rep brings the topics, signals engagement and ownership; higher is better.

Action-item follow-through rate measures whether commitments survive past the call. And at the program level, rep engagement and retention correlate with consistent 1-on-1s, the pattern Gallup quantified as roughly three times higher engagement.

The common mistakes mirror the metrics in reverse. Letting the meeting become a status recitation, talking far more than the rep does, skipping follow-up, and freezing the agenda into one repeated shape all hollow out the ritual. Each is easy to diagnose and easy to fix once a manager treats the 1-on-1 as a coaching system with measurable inputs, supported by platforms like Lattice, 15Five, and Culture Amp, rather than a recurring obligation on the calendar.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long should a sales 1-on-1 be?

Thirty to forty-five minutes weekly is the standard. Long enough to cover a personal check-in, a quick number review, and real deal coaching, but short enough to stay disciplined. If it routinely runs over, the cause is usually a status update that should have been async, not a need for more time.

Should I ever cancel a 1-on-1 when things get busy?

Almost never. Reschedule within the same week if a genuine conflict arises, but treat cancellation as nearly forbidden. Bumping a 1-on-1 for a pipeline call tells the rep exactly where they rank, and on a remote team that signal is amplified. Protecting the meeting is the cheapest trust-building move a manager has.

How is a 1-on-1 different from a pipeline review?

A pipeline review is forecast inspection across deals; a 1-on-1 is coaching and development for the individual. Keeping them separate prevents the 1-on-1 from collapsing into a CRM walkthrough. Run the pipeline review with the team or async, and reserve the 1-on-1 for going deep on one or two deals plus skills and blockers.

How is AI changing sales 1-on-1s in 2027?

AI now prepares the brief. It assembles the rep's metrics, flags at-risk deals, and surfaces coaching moments from call analytics in tools like Gong and Chorus, including talk-ratio and missed-next-step alerts. That frees the manager to spend live time on judgment and motivation rather than data prep, which is the part of management that does not automate.

Should 1-on-1 cadence change based on the rep?

Yes. Ramping reps need two touches a week or daily check-ins while they build judgment. Tenured A-players do well with a lighter weekly rhythm focused on strategy and growth. Struggling reps need more frequent, more structured sessions, often tied to a performance plan with dated milestones. Matching cadence to tenure beats a rigid one-size policy.

What metrics tell me my 1-on-1s are working?

Track completion rate (target 95 percent or higher), the percentage of meetings where the rep drives the agenda, and action-item follow-through. At the program level, watch engagement and retention; Gallup links consistent manager 1-on-1s to roughly three times higher engagement, which is the outcome the other metrics are proxies for.

Sources

Gallup, State of the Global Workplace research on manager 1-on-1s and engagement (2024-2026)
Winning by Design, sales management and coaching framework guidance
Sales Management Association, manager cadence and 1-on-1 benchmarks
Gong, revenue intelligence and call-analytics coaching research
Chorus by ZoomInfo, conversation intelligence for deal review
Lattice and Culture Amp, performance management and 1-on-1 platform documentation
15Five, manager 1-on-1 and continuous performance practices
Hypercontext and Fellow.app, 1-on-1 agenda and running-notes tooling
Korn Ferry, sales leadership and manager effectiveness advisory (2026)
Salesforce and HubSpot, sales management and pipeline review best-practice guides

Download:

### Direct Answer

Run a protected weekly 30-45 minute 1-on-1 per rep that you never cancel, structured around the rep's agenda first, then a quota and pipeline pulse, deep coaching on one or two live deals (not a status update), and one focus skill. In remote-first teams, open with a genuine personal check-in, keep video on, and use a shared running doc for action items. Vary the agenda week to week so it does not collapse into a forecast call. In 2027, let AI prepare the brief — current metrics, at-risk deals, and coaching moments pulled from call analytics in Gong or Chorus — so your live time goes to judgment and motivation, not data recitation. Adjust frequency by tenure: ramping reps get two touches a week or daily check-ins, tenured A-players get a lighter weekly rhythm, and struggling reps get more structure tied to a performance plan. Track completion rate (target 95 percent or higher), how often the rep drives the agenda, and action-item follow-through. Gallup research links regular manager 1-on-1s to roughly three times higher engagement, which is why this single ritual outperforms almost any tooling investment a remote sales org can make.

## 1. Why 1-on-1s matter more in remote-first sales

The 1-on-1 is the core management ritual, and remote-first work amplifies its importance rather than reducing it. In a physical office a sales manager picks up dozens of micro-signals for free: the rep who looks deflated after a lost call, the hallway question about pricing, the overheard objection a teammate just fumbled. Distributed teams lose all of that ambient coaching. The 1-on-1 becomes the deliberate replacement for the hallway, and when it disappears so does most of the coaching a rep ever receives.

Companies that built strong remote cultures — Salesforce and HubSpot among them — treat the recurring 1-on-1 as the load-bearing column of management, not an optional check-in. Performance platforms like Lattice, Culture Amp, and 15Five exist precisely because organizations realized that manager conversations, captured and followed up consistently, drive retention and quota attainment more reliably than any new incentive plan. Gallup has spent years documenting the same effect: employees who get regular, meaningful manager attention engage at roughly three times the rate of those who do not.

For a sales team the stakes are sharper than for most functions. Reps live on a quarterly clock, carry public numbers, and ride an emotional cycle that swings with every deal. A skipped 1-on-1 is not a neutral event. It quietly tells the rep that the manager is busy with something more important, and on a remote team where that manager is already a face on a screen, the signal lands hard.

## 2. The right cadence (and never cancelling)

The default cadence is a weekly 1-on-1 with every direct report, 30 to 45 minutes, on a recurring calendar hold. That weekly rhythm is the baseline that practitioners at the Sales Management Association and methodology shops like Winning by Design consistently recommend, because it matches the natural cycle of a sales week without becoming a burden.

Around that weekly anchor sit a few lighter-weight rituals so the 1-on-1 does not have to carry everything. Async deal reviews handle the rep's individual opportunities between meetings. A separate team pipeline review covers forecast and stage hygiene so the 1-on-1 does not degrade into a CRM walkthrough. Skip-level conversations, where a second-line leader meets directly with reps, run monthly or quarterly to surface what is not making it up the chain.

The single most important cadence rule is this: **do not cancel 1-on-1s.** Reschedule if you genuinely must, but treat cancellation as nearly forbidden. When a manager bumps a 1-on-1 for a pipeline call or a customer escalation, the rep correctly reads the priority order. Protecting the meeting is the cheapest, highest-trust signal a remote manager can send, and protecting it 95 percent of the time is a measurable behavior, not a vague intention.

## 3. The structure of a high-value sales 1-on-1

A good sales 1-on-1 follows a consistent arc, even as the emphasis shifts week to week. **Open with a personal check-in** of about five minutes. This is rapport, not theater, and it matters far more remotely than it did in an office where small talk happened naturally. Skipping it to "get to business" is a frequent mistake on distributed teams.

**Let the rep drive the agenda next.** Their topics come first, before yours. A 1-on-1 is fundamentally the rep's meeting, and surfacing their concerns early changes the entire tone from inspection to support. Then move into a quick number review: quota pace, pipeline health, and whether coverage is sufficient for the quarter. Keep this tight, because it is the part most likely to swell and crowd out coaching.

The center of gravity should be **deal coaching on one or two opportunities, going deep rather than wide.** Pick a deal that is stuck, large, or instructive, and actually coach it — interrogate the next step, the economic buyer, the competitive risk. After that, spend time on **one focus skill** the rep is developing, whether discovery questioning, multithreading, or negotiation. Close with **blockers and asks**, where the rep names what is in their way, and finish with **explicit action items and accountability** so the conversation produces commitments rather than just talk.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Personal check-in ~5 min] --> B[Rep-driven agenda first]
    B --> C[Number review: quota pace + pipeline health]
    C --> D[Deal coaching: 1-2 deals deep]
    D --> E[Skill development: one focus skill]
    E --> F[Blockers and asks]
    F --> G[Action items + accountability]
    G --> H[Logged in shared running doc]
```

## 4. Deal coaching vs. Status updates

The difference between a valuable 1-on-1 and a wasted one usually comes down to whether the manager is coaching or merely collecting status. **A pure pipeline status update is a CRM report, not a conversation.** If the entire meeting is the rep reciting stage and close date for every open deal, that information already lives in Salesforce or HubSpot and the live time added nothing.

Coaching looks different. It picks one or two deals and digs into the reasoning: who is the real decision maker, what is the compelling event, where is the deal actually at risk, and what specific next step moves it forward. The manager asks more than they tell. **A manager who talks 80 percent of the time is lecturing, not coaching**, and on a remote call that imbalance is even easier to fall into because silence feels more awkward over video.

Two more failure patterns undermine deal coaching. The first is **no follow-through on action items** — commitments made and then never revisited teach the rep that the meeting does not matter. The second is **running the same agenda every single week.** A high-functioning manager varies the emphasis: deal coaching one week, a skill deep-dive the next, a career and development conversation after that. Rotating the focus keeps the meeting from calcifying into a forecast ritual.

## 5. Remote-specific practices

Distributed teams need a handful of deliberate practices to make 1-on-1s land. **Keep video on and remove distractions** on both sides; a camera-off, half-attention 1-on-1 communicates disengagement no matter what words are spoken. Maintain a **shared running document** — many teams use Fellow.app, Hypercontext, or a simple shared doc — that holds the rolling agenda, notes, and action items so nothing depends on memory and either party can prepare ahead of time.

Push routine information into **async pre-work.** The rep updates the CRM and writes short deal notes before the meeting, so live time is not consumed by data entry the rep could have done alone. This is the single highest-leverage change most remote managers can make.

Finally, lean on **call recordings to compress live time.** Tools like Gong and Chorus capture every customer conversation, and a manager can review a flagged call asynchronously rather than asking the rep to narrate it from memory. That shifts the 1-on-1 from "tell me what happened" to "I watched the demo, let us talk about the moment the buyer went quiet," which is a categorically better use of synchronous time.

## 6. How AI preps the 1-on-1 in 2027

By 2027 the most visible change is that **AI prepares the 1-on-1 brief.** Instead of the manager assembling metrics by hand, the system generates a pre-read containing the rep's quota pace, pipeline movement since last week, deals that have gone quiet, and specific coaching moments surfaced from call analytics. Korn Ferry and other advisory firms now frame this as the manager's standing prep layer rather than a novelty.

The analytics engines built on Gong and Chorus data **flag coaching opportunities automatically** — an unbalanced talk-to-listen ratio, a missing next step after a key call, a discovery conversation that skipped budget. The AI does not coach; it points the manager at the exact moments worth coaching, which is the hard part of preparation that managers rarely have time to do well.

The result is a cleaner division of labor. **AI handles data preparation, and the manager spends live time on judgment and motivation.** A human still has to interpret why a strong rep suddenly went cautious, decide whether a stalled deal is worth more effort, and rebuild the confidence of someone in a slump. That work does not automate, and pushing the mechanical prep to software is what finally creates room for it.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[New rep ramping?] -->|Yes| B[2x per week or daily check-ins]
    A -->|No| C[Tenured A-player?]
    C -->|Yes| D[Weekly, lighter touch]
    C -->|No| E[Struggling / off-plan?]
    E -->|Yes| F[More frequent + structured PIP cadence]
    E -->|No| G[Standard weekly 30-45 min]
```

## 7. Adjusting cadence by rep tenure

One cadence does not fit every rep. **New reps who are still ramping** need more contact — twice a week or even brief daily check-ins during onboarding — because the cost of a bad habit forming early is high and the rep has not yet built independent judgment. The extra touches taper as competence grows.

**Tenured A-players** earn a lighter weekly rhythm. They still get a protected 1-on-1, but it leans toward strategy, career growth, and the occasional hard deal rather than close inspection. Over-managing a top performer is its own failure mode; the meeting should feel like a resource, not surveillance.

**Struggling reps** need the opposite: more frequency and more structure, often tied to a formal performance plan with explicit, dated milestones. The cadence here is deliberately tighter so that progress (or its absence) becomes visible quickly and fairly. The point is documentation and genuine support, not a paper trail for its own sake.

## 8. Metrics and common mistakes

A few metrics tell you whether the 1-on-1 program is healthy. **The 1-on-1 completion rate should sit at 95 percent or higher** — the share of scheduled meetings actually held rather than cancelled. The **rep-driven agenda percentage**, how often the rep brings the topics, signals engagement and ownership; higher is better. **Action-item follow-through rate** measures whether commitments survive past the call. And at the program level, **rep engagement and retention correlate with consistent 1-on-1s**, the pattern Gallup quantified as roughly three times higher engagement.

The common mistakes mirror the metrics in reverse. Letting the meeting become a status recitation, talking far more than the rep does, skipping follow-up, and freezing the agenda into one repeated shape all hollow out the ritual. Each is easy to diagnose and easy to fix once a manager treats the 1-on-1 as a coaching system with measurable inputs, supported by platforms like Lattice, 15Five, and Culture Amp, rather than a recurring obligation on the calendar.

## Frequently Asked Questions

**How long should a sales 1-on-1 be?**

Thirty to forty-five minutes weekly is the standard. Long enough to cover a personal check-in, a quick number review, and real deal coaching, but short enough to stay disciplined. If it routinely runs over, the cause is usually a status update that should have been async, not a need for more time.

**Should I ever cancel a 1-on-1 when things get busy?**

Almost never. Reschedule within the same week if a genuine conflict arises, but treat cancellation as nearly forbidden. Bumping a 1-on-1 for a pipeline call tells the rep exactly where they rank, and on a remote team that signal is amplified. Protecting the meeting is the cheapest trust-building move a manager has.

**How is a 1-on-1 different from a pipeline review?**

A pipeline review is forecast inspection across deals; a 1-on-1 is coaching and development for the individual. Keeping them separate prevents the 1-on-1 from collapsing into a CRM walkthrough. Run the pipeline review with the team or async, and reserve the 1-on-1 for going deep on one or two deals plus skills and blockers.

**How is AI changing sales 1-on-1s in 2027?**

AI now prepares the brief. It assembles the rep's metrics, flags at-risk deals, and surfaces coaching moments from call analytics in tools like Gong and Chorus, including talk-ratio and missed-next-step alerts. That frees the manager to spend live time on judgment and motivation rather than data prep, which is the part of management that does not automate.

**Should 1-on-1 cadence change based on the rep?**

Yes. Ramping reps need two touches a week or daily check-ins while they build judgment. Tenured A-players do well with a lighter weekly rhythm focused on strategy and growth. Struggling reps need more frequent, more structured sessions, often tied to a performance plan with dated milestones. Matching cadence to tenure beats a rigid one-size policy.

**What metrics tell me my 1-on-1s are working?**

Track completion rate (target 95 percent or higher), the percentage of meetings where the rep drives the agenda, and action-item follow-through. At the program level, watch engagement and retention; Gallup links consistent manager 1-on-1s to roughly three times higher engagement, which is the outcome the other metrics are proxies for.

## Sources

- Gallup, State of the Global Workplace research on manager 1-on-1s and engagement (2024-2026)
- Winning by Design, sales management and coaching framework guidance
- Sales Management Association, manager cadence and 1-on-1 benchmarks
- Gong, revenue intelligence and call-analytics coaching research
- Chorus by ZoomInfo, conversation intelligence for deal review
- Lattice and Culture Amp, performance management and 1-on-1 platform documentation
- 15Five, manager 1-on-1 and continuous performance practices
- Hypercontext and Fellow.app, 1-on-1 agenda and running-notes tooling
- Korn Ferry, sales leadership and manager effectiveness advisory (2026)
- Salesforce and HubSpot, sales management and pipeline review best-practice guides

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Pulse CheckScore reps on the metrics that matter Gross Profit CalculatorModel margin per deal, per rep, per territory

Deep dive · related in the library