What does lead routing by fit score versus round-robin actually change in conversion metrics?
Brief
Fit-based routing lifts SQL→Opp by 8–15 points. Round-robin is a death sentence for inbound.
Detail
Round-robin ("next rep gets next lead") assumes all leads are equal. They are not. Fit-score routing sends high-probability leads to your best closer in the right territory.
The Math
Take 200 SQLs per month across 4 AEs:
Round-Robin Baseline (Equal distribution, no quality sort):
- Rep A: 50 SQLs, 6 Opps (12%), $280K pipe
- Rep B: 50 SQLs, 7 Opps (14%), $340K pipe
- Rep C: 50 SQLs, 9 Opps (18%), $420K pipe
- Rep D: 50 SQLs, 4 Opps (8%), $190K pipe
- Total: 26 Opps, $1.23M pipe
Fit-Score Routing (High-fit to best closer + territory matcher):
- Rep A: 35 SQLs (44 low-fit overflow), 8 Opps (23%), $380K pipe
- Rep B: 40 SQLs (35 warm-fit), 8 Opps (20%), $390K pipe
- Rep C: 60 SQLs (50 hot-fit, natural fit), 15 Opps (25%), $680K pipe
- Rep D: 65 SQLs (20 nurture-track, no call), 3 Opps (15%), $140K pipe
- Total: 34 Opps, $1.59M pipe (+31% pipeline, +23% conversion)
The secret: 30% of your SQLs are warm/nurture. Don't waste a rep on them.
Fit-Score Attributes
| Attribute | Weight | High-Fit Signal | Low-Fit Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company size (ACV match) | 30% | $5M–$100M revenue | <$1M revenue |
| Title/Role | 25% | VP/C-suite | Analyst, Coordinator |
| Intent/Urgency | 25% | RFP, demo, pricing page | Blog visit, whitepaper |
| Territory | 15% | Rep's assigned region | Non-overlapping geo |
| Total Score | 100% | >70 = Tier 1 | <40 = Nurture |
Implement Pavilion, Marketo lead scoring, or Apollo fit assessment to get scores flowing. Manual routing is theater.
TAGS: lead-routing,fit-score,round-robin,SQL-distribution,conversion-lift,Pavilion