How do you decide which reps to coach first?

Curated by Kory White · Fractional CRO, CRO Syndicate

👍 Yup or 👎 Nope — vote this up its category:

📅 Published Jun 20, 2026

Direct Answer

Coach your middle 60% first — the steady "core performers" — not the bottom 10% and not your stars. That is where a coaching hour returns the most revenue, because a small skill lift across many capable reps moves more pipeline than heroic effort spent rescuing one struggling rep or polishing someone already at quota.

The exact move: rank every rep by coachability × revenue upside × deal exposure, pick the handful where a fixable skill gap is blocking a real number, and start there. Reserve bottom-tier reps for a separate, honest performance conversation (sometimes a PIP, not coaching), and keep your top reps on a lighter "sharpen, don't fix" cadence.

In 2027, with AI call-coaching tools like Gong and Chorus surfacing the gaps automatically, the manager's scarce resource is no longer *finding* what to coach — it's *deciding who gets your time*.

Why This Happens — Diagnose Before You Coach

Most managers default to one of two bad instincts: coach the loudest fire (the rep missing quota) or coach the favorite (the top rep who's fun to talk to). Both waste the asset. The bottom rep often has a will, fit, or system problem that no amount of skill coaching fixes.

The top rep is already converting; another hour yields a rounding error. The math favors the middle.

Before you assign your time, root-cause why a rep is where they are. There are four very different causes, and only one of them is actually a coaching problem:

Skill — they don't yet know *how* (weak discovery, can't multithread, fumbles pricing). This is the bread and butter of coaching and the only one that responds to drills and role-play.
Will — they know how but won't (low activity, avoids prospecting, coasting). Coaching turns into motivation and accountability, not technique.
Knowledge — they lack product, market, or buyer context. Fixed faster by enablement and reps-shadowing than by 1:1 coaching.
System / territory — bad patch, broken comp, no leads, a product gap. No coaching fixes a structural problem. This is a management decision, not a coaching session.

The decision tree below routes a manager from the symptom to the real cause, and tells you whether this rep belongs in your coaching priority list at all.

flowchart TD A[Rep is underperforming or plateaued] --> B{Do they have a real, fixable number gap?} B -- No, already at quota --> S[Light 'sharpen' cadence only] B -- Yes --> C{Can they do it when shown?} C -- No, never demonstrated it --> D[SKILL gap -> COACH FIRST] C -- Yes, but doesn't --> E{Activity present?} E -- No --> F[WILL gap -> accountability, then PIP if no change] E -- Yes, wrong actions --> G{Product/market knowledge there?} G -- No --> H[KNOWLEDGE gap -> enablement, not 1:1] G -- Yes --> I{Territory, leads, comp, product OK?} I -- No --> J[SYSTEM problem -> fix the system, do NOT coach] I -- Yes --> D D --> K{High revenue upside + coachable?} K -- Yes --> L[TOP PRIORITY this quarter] K -- Low upside --> M[Queue behind the core 60%]

The reps who land in the SKILL → high upside → coachable box are your first calls. That is almost always the capable middle, not the extremes.

The Coaching Conversation

Once you've picked the rep, the first 1:1 sets whether coaching lands or feels like a performance review in disguise. Use the GROW model — Goal, Reality, Options, Will — so the rep does the thinking and owns the plan. Here is a verbatim opener you can paste into a 1:1 doc:

"I want to spend real coaching time with you this quarter because I think you're close to a level-up, not because something's wrong. What's the one part of your deals you most want to get better at?"

Lead with upside, not deficit — the middle 60% disengages instantly if it smells like remediation. Then walk GROW with these exact prompts:

Goal: *"By the end of this quarter, what would 'I got measurably better' look like for you — a number or a skill?"*
Reality: *"Walk me through your last lost deal. Where exactly did it slip — and what did you do at that moment?"* (Pull the call up in Gong while you ask.)
Options: *"What are two different ways you could have handled that multithreading moment? What would [top rep's name] have done?"*
Will: *"Which of those will you try on your next three calls, and how do you want me to hold you to it?"*

For a skill-specific gap — say a rep who runs great demos but stalls at close — the script gets sharper:

"You earn the demo every time, so the talent's there. The deals die after the demo. Let's look at three calls where the buyer went quiet and figure out what we didn't ask in discovery."

Notice what you're *not* doing: you're not solving the deal for them, and you're not lecturing. The questions force the rep to surface their own gap, which is the only version of coaching that sticks.

The Coaching Plan / Cadence

Decide who first, then commit to a rhythm — sporadic coaching is worse than none because it signals the work doesn't matter. A workable model for a manager with 6–8 reps:

Weekly: a 30-minute coaching 1:1 with each of your 2–3 priority core reps, built around one reviewed call.
Biweekly: a 45-minute live deal review on their top open opportunity using MEDDIC as the checklist.
Monthly: review the leading indicators (below) and re-rank the priority list — reps graduate off it and new ones rotate on.
30/60/90: Day 30, the rep can name and demonstrate the target skill in role-play. Day 60, it shows up in live calls (verified in Gong/Chorus). Day 90, it shows up in the conversion metric.

The loop itself never changes; only the rep in it does:

flowchart LR A[Observe a real call] --> B[Diagnose skill vs will vs knowledge] B --> C[Coach one skill via GROW] C --> D[Practice in role-play] D --> E[Measure leading indicator] E --> F{Improving?} F -- Yes --> G[Graduate -> light cadence, rotate next rep in] F -- No --> A

Keep the loop to one skill at a time. The fastest way to stall a coachable rep is to dump five fixes on them at once.

Drills & Role-Play

Reps don't change from feedback; they change from reps. Build the muscle with deliberate practice:

Call-review drill: Pick one call per week in Gong or Chorus, mute the audio, and have the rep narrate what they'd do differently before they hear themselves. Then play it.
Discovery role-play: You play a skeptical economic buyer; the rep has 6 minutes to surface a quantified problem. Score it against a discovery scorecard (problem, impact, metric, decision process).
Objection ladder: Rapid-fire the five objections that kill your deals; the rep must respond in under 10 seconds, then debrief the best framing.
Win/loss teardown: Have the priority rep present one win and one loss to peers using a MEDDPICC scorecard — peer coaching scales your time.
Demo-to-discovery flip (for the "great demo, can't close" rep): force them to run discovery only, no slides, until the next-step ask becomes automatic.

What to Measure

Coaching is judged by leading indicators, because quota is a lagging number that moves a quarter too late to course-correct. Track the behavior you coached, not just the result:

Skill-specific conversion: if you coached discovery, watch discovery-to-demo conversion, not total bookings.
Behavior change in calls: talk-to-listen ratio, number of discovery questions, multithreading (contacts per deal) — all visible in Gong/Chorus.
Stage conversion at the specific point you targeted (e.g., demo → proposal).
Ramp time for the newer reps in your priority set.
Win rate trend over a rolling 90 days, not a single deal.

If the leading indicator moves and the lagging number eventually follows, you coached the right rep on the right thing. If activity is up but conversion is flat, you likely have a will or system problem masquerading as skill.

Common Mistakes Managers Make

Coaching the bottom 10% by default. Emotionally satisfying, financially backwards. Many bottom reps need a clear performance conversation or a PIP, not another role-play.
Coaching the deal, not the skill. Saving this quarter's deal feels productive but teaches the rep nothing transferable. Coach the pattern behind the deal.
No follow-through. Assigning a skill in week one and never checking the call in week three trains reps that coaching is theater.
Coaching everyone the same. Stars need sharpening; the middle needs building; strugglers need diagnosis. One cadence for all wastes everyone's time.
Rescuing the rep. Jumping on the call to "show them" robs the rep of the rep. Let them struggle in role-play where it's safe.
Mistaking a system problem for a skill problem. If three reps fail in the same territory, fix the territory, not the reps.

FAQ

Should I ever coach my top reps? Yes, but on a lighter "sharpen, don't fix" cadence — a monthly call review and one stretch skill. Pulling your best closer into weekly remedial-style coaching insults them and yields almost no marginal revenue. Their highest-value coaching role is often peer-teaching the middle.

What if the underperformer is genuinely coachable but low-priority? Queue them behind the core 60% and give them enablement and self-serve resources in the meantime. Coachability without near-term revenue upside earns a spot in the rotation, just not the front of the line this quarter.

How many reps can I actually coach well at once? Two to four for deep weekly coaching, depending on team size and your other duties. Beyond that, depth collapses into status updates. Rotate reps through your priority slots as they graduate.

How do I tell a will problem from a skill problem? Ask them to do the thing in role-play. If they *can* do it when watched but *don't* in the wild, it's will (or system). If they genuinely can't demonstrate it, it's skill. Only the skill case responds to coaching.

Does AI call-coaching replace the manager? No. Tools like Gong, Chorus, and Clari surface what to coach far faster than manual call review, but they don't decide who deserves your scarce hours or hold the human accountability conversation. They make your prioritization sharper, not unnecessary.

When is coaching the wrong tool entirely? When the gap is fit (wrong hire), comp, territory, leads, or a product gap. Those are management decisions. Coaching a structural failure just burns goodwill and delays the real fix.

Bottom Line

Decide who to coach by where the next hour returns the most revenue, and that is almost always the coachable, high-upside middle — not the struggling bottom and not the already-converting top. Diagnose **skill vs. Will vs.

Knowledge vs. System** before you commit time, coach one skill at a time on a steady cadence, and measure the leading indicator you targeted. Be honest when the answer is a performance conversation or a system fix instead of coaching at all.

Sources

*Sales coaching for prioritizing reps — how to decide which reps to coach first, sales manager coaching guide, rep coaching framework, coaching the middle 60%, and a sales coaching playbook for 2027.*

Keep reading

### Direct Answer

Coach your **middle 60% first** — the steady "core performers" — not the bottom 10% and not your stars. That is where a coaching hour returns the most revenue, because a small skill lift across many capable reps moves more pipeline than heroic effort spent rescuing one struggling rep or polishing someone already at quota. The exact move: **rank every rep by coachability × revenue upside × deal exposure**, pick the handful where a fixable skill gap is blocking a real number, and start there. Reserve bottom-tier reps for a separate, honest performance conversation (sometimes a **PIP**, not coaching), and keep your top reps on a lighter "sharpen, don't fix" cadence. In 2027, with AI call-coaching tools like **Gong** and **Chorus** surfacing the gaps automatically, the manager's scarce resource is no longer *finding* what to coach — it's *deciding who gets your time*.

## Why This Happens — Diagnose Before You Coach

Most managers default to one of two bad instincts: coach the loudest fire (the rep missing quota) or coach the favorite (the top rep who's fun to talk to). Both waste the asset. The bottom rep often has a **will, fit, or system problem** that no amount of skill coaching fixes. The top rep is already converting; another hour yields a rounding error. The math favors the middle.

Before you assign your time, root-cause why a rep is where they are. There are four very different causes, and only one of them is actually a coaching problem:

- **Skill** — they don't yet know *how* (weak discovery, can't multithread, fumbles pricing). This is the bread and butter of coaching and the only one that responds to drills and role-play.
- **Will** — they know how but won't (low activity, avoids prospecting, coasting). Coaching turns into motivation and accountability, not technique.
- **Knowledge** — they lack product, market, or buyer context. Fixed faster by enablement and reps-shadowing than by 1:1 coaching.
- **System / territory** — bad patch, broken comp, no leads, a product gap. **No coaching fixes a structural problem.** This is a management decision, not a coaching session.

The decision tree below routes a manager from the symptom to the real cause, and tells you whether this rep belongs in your coaching priority list at all.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Rep is underperforming or plateaued] --> B{Do they have a real, fixable number gap?}
    B -- No, already at quota --> S[Light 'sharpen' cadence only]
    B -- Yes --> C{Can they do it when shown?}
    C -- No, never demonstrated it --> D[SKILL gap -> COACH FIRST]
    C -- Yes, but doesn't --> E{Activity present?}
    E -- No --> F[WILL gap -> accountability, then PIP if no change]
    E -- Yes, wrong actions --> G{Product/market knowledge there?}
    G -- No --> H[KNOWLEDGE gap -> enablement, not 1:1]
    G -- Yes --> I{Territory, leads, comp, product OK?}
    I -- No --> J[SYSTEM problem -> fix the system, do NOT coach]
    I -- Yes --> D
    D --> K{High revenue upside + coachable?}
    K -- Yes --> L[TOP PRIORITY this quarter]
    K -- Low upside --> M[Queue behind the core 60%]
```

The reps who land in the **SKILL → high upside → coachable** box are your first calls. That is almost always the capable middle, not the extremes.

## The Coaching Conversation

Once you've picked the rep, the first 1:1 sets whether coaching lands or feels like a performance review in disguise. Use the **GROW model** — Goal, Reality, Options, Will — so the rep does the thinking and owns the plan. Here is a verbatim opener you can paste into a 1:1 doc:

> **"I want to spend real coaching time with you this quarter because I think you're close to a level-up, not because something's wrong. What's the one part of your deals you most want to get better at?"**

Lead with upside, not deficit — the middle 60% disengages instantly if it smells like remediation. Then walk GROW with these exact prompts:

- **Goal:** *"By the end of this quarter, what would 'I got measurably better' look like for you — a number or a skill?"*
- **Reality:** *"Walk me through your last lost deal. Where exactly did it slip — and what did you do at that moment?"* (Pull the call up in Gong while you ask.)
- **Options:** *"What are two different ways you could have handled that multithreading moment? What would [top rep's name] have done?"*
- **Will:** *"Which of those will you try on your next three calls, and how do you want me to hold you to it?"*

For a skill-specific gap — say a rep who runs great demos but stalls at close — the script gets sharper:

> **"You earn the demo every time, so the talent's there. The deals die after the demo. Let's look at three calls where the buyer went quiet and figure out what we didn't ask in discovery."**

Notice what you're *not* doing: you're not solving the deal for them, and you're not lecturing. The questions force the rep to surface their own gap, which is the only version of coaching that sticks.

## The Coaching Plan / Cadence

Decide who first, then commit to a **rhythm** — sporadic coaching is worse than none because it signals the work doesn't matter. A workable model for a manager with 6–8 reps:

- **Weekly:** a 30-minute coaching 1:1 with each of your 2–3 priority core reps, built around one reviewed call.
- **Biweekly:** a 45-minute live deal review on their top open opportunity using **MEDDIC** as the checklist.
- **Monthly:** review the leading indicators (below) and re-rank the priority list — reps graduate off it and new ones rotate on.
- **30/60/90:** Day 30, the rep can name and demonstrate the target skill in role-play. Day 60, it shows up in live calls (verified in Gong/Chorus). Day 90, it shows up in the conversion metric.

The loop itself never changes; only the rep in it does:

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    A[Observe a real call] --> B[Diagnose skill vs will vs knowledge]
    B --> C[Coach one skill via GROW]
    C --> D[Practice in role-play]
    D --> E[Measure leading indicator]
    E --> F{Improving?}
    F -- Yes --> G[Graduate -> light cadence, rotate next rep in]
    F -- No --> A
```

Keep the loop to **one skill at a time**. The fastest way to stall a coachable rep is to dump five fixes on them at once.

## Drills & Role-Play

Reps don't change from feedback; they change from reps. Build the muscle with deliberate practice:

- **Call-review drill:** Pick one call per week in **Gong** or **Chorus**, mute the audio, and have the rep narrate what they'd do differently before they hear themselves. Then play it.
- **Discovery role-play:** You play a skeptical economic buyer; the rep has 6 minutes to surface a quantified problem. Score it against a discovery scorecard (problem, impact, metric, decision process).
- **Objection ladder:** Rapid-fire the five objections that kill your deals; the rep must respond in under 10 seconds, then debrief the best framing.
- **Win/loss teardown:** Have the priority rep present one win and one loss to peers using a **MEDDPICC** scorecard — peer coaching scales your time.
- **Demo-to-discovery flip** (for the "great demo, can't close" rep): force them to run discovery only, no slides, until the next-step ask becomes automatic.

## What to Measure

Coaching is judged by **leading indicators**, because quota is a lagging number that moves a quarter too late to course-correct. Track the behavior you coached, not just the result:

- **Skill-specific conversion:** if you coached discovery, watch discovery-to-demo conversion, not total bookings.
- **Behavior change in calls:** talk-to-listen ratio, number of discovery questions, multithreading (contacts per deal) — all visible in Gong/Chorus.
- **Stage conversion** at the specific point you targeted (e.g., demo → proposal).
- **Ramp time** for the newer reps in your priority set.
- **Win rate trend** over a rolling 90 days, not a single deal.

If the leading indicator moves and the lagging number eventually follows, you coached the right rep on the right thing. If activity is up but conversion is flat, you likely have a will or system problem masquerading as skill.

## Common Mistakes Managers Make

- **Coaching the bottom 10% by default.** Emotionally satisfying, financially backwards. Many bottom reps need a clear performance conversation or a **PIP**, not another role-play.
- **Coaching the deal, not the skill.** Saving this quarter's deal feels productive but teaches the rep nothing transferable. Coach the pattern behind the deal.
- **No follow-through.** Assigning a skill in week one and never checking the call in week three trains reps that coaching is theater.
- **Coaching everyone the same.** Stars need sharpening; the middle needs building; strugglers need diagnosis. One cadence for all wastes everyone's time.
- **Rescuing the rep.** Jumping on the call to "show them" robs the rep of the rep. Let them struggle in role-play where it's safe.
- **Mistaking a system problem for a skill problem.** If three reps fail in the same territory, fix the territory, not the reps.

## FAQ

**Should I ever coach my top reps?**
Yes, but on a lighter "sharpen, don't fix" cadence — a monthly call review and one stretch skill. Pulling your best closer into weekly remedial-style coaching insults them and yields almost no marginal revenue. Their highest-value coaching role is often peer-teaching the middle.

**What if the underperformer is genuinely coachable but low-priority?**
Queue them behind the core 60% and give them enablement and self-serve resources in the meantime. Coachability without near-term revenue upside earns a spot in the rotation, just not the front of the line this quarter.

**How many reps can I actually coach well at once?**
Two to four for deep weekly coaching, depending on team size and your other duties. Beyond that, depth collapses into status updates. Rotate reps through your priority slots as they graduate.

**How do I tell a will problem from a skill problem?**
Ask them to do the thing in role-play. If they *can* do it when watched but *don't* in the wild, it's will (or system). If they genuinely can't demonstrate it, it's skill. Only the skill case responds to coaching.

**Does AI call-coaching replace the manager?**
No. Tools like **Gong**, **Chorus**, and **Clari** surface what to coach far faster than manual call review, but they don't decide who deserves your scarce hours or hold the human accountability conversation. They make your prioritization sharper, not unnecessary.

**When is coaching the wrong tool entirely?**
When the gap is fit (wrong hire), comp, territory, leads, or a product gap. Those are management decisions. Coaching a structural failure just burns goodwill and delays the real fix.

## Bottom Line

Decide who to coach by where the next hour returns the most revenue, and that is almost always the **coachable, high-upside middle** — not the struggling bottom and not the already-converting top. Diagnose **skill vs. Will vs. Knowledge vs. System** before you commit time, coach one skill at a time on a steady cadence, and measure the leading indicator you targeted. Be honest when the answer is a performance conversation or a system fix instead of coaching at all.

## Sources

- [Gong Labs: What the best sales managers do differently](https://www.gong.io/blog/sales-coaching/)
- [Harvard Business Review: The Best Sales Reps Do What Others Don't](https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-most-productive-ways-to-coach-your-sales-team)
- [RAIN Group: Sales Coaching Research and Best Practices](https://www.rainsalestraining.com/blog/sales-coaching-best-practices)
- [Sales Hacker: A Sales Manager's Guide to Coaching](https://www.saleshacker.com/sales-coaching-guide/)
- [The GROW Model (MindTools) for coaching conversations](https://www.mindtools.com/an0fzpz/the-grow-model-of-coaching-and-mentoring)
- [Winning by Design: Sales Coaching Frameworks](https://winningbydesign.com/resources/)
- [MEDDIC Academy: The MEDDIC / MEDDPICC Sales Qualification Methodology](https://meddic.academy/what-is-meddic/)

*Sales coaching for prioritizing reps — how to decide which reps to coach first, sales manager coaching guide, rep coaching framework, coaching the middle 60%, and a sales coaching playbook for 2027.*

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Pulse CheckScore reps on the metrics that matter Gross Profit CalculatorModel margin per deal, per rep, per territory

Related in the library

How do you decide which reps to coach first?

Direct Answer

Why This Happens — Diagnose Before You Coach

The Coaching Conversation

The Coaching Plan / Cadence

Drills & Role-Play

What to Measure

Common Mistakes Managers Make

FAQ

Bottom Line

Sources

What does the score mean?