Who are the biggest NIL collectives in 2027 by total fund size?

1. Why The 2027 Collective Ranking Looks Different Than 2024

1.1 The House settlement reshuffled the deck

Before the House v. NCAA settlement took effect July 1, 2025, NIL collectives were the *only* legal vehicle for paying college athletes. In 2027 they have shifted to a supplemental role, sitting on top of direct revenue-sharing payments that schools now make from a $20.5M cap (FY26) rising 4% per year to roughly $22.2M in FY27. Collectives still matter — they fund the delta between cap and market — but their *relative* ranking now depends on who can stack above-cap "fair-market-value" deals the fastest.

1.2 The NIL Go clearinghouse changed who can spend

Every collective deal above $600 must clear NIL Go, the Deloitte-operated clearinghouse that ranges payments against a fair-market-value algorithm. Booster-funded "pay-for-play" deals are flagged and rejected, which has compressed some collectives' spend and rewarded those who built legitimate marketing inventory: ticket bundles, autograph signings, branded apparel runs, and licensed video content. Texas One Fund, Spyre, and The Foundation built that inventory first and now process 3-5x the cleared deal volume of mid-tier programs.

1.3 Frontloading distorted 2025-26 numbers

In spring and summer 2025, dozens of collectives frontloaded deals to athletes before the cap kicked in. Spyre Sports paid out roughly $20M in a six-week window. Texas One Fund cleared $15M. The Foundation at Ohio State paid $12M. Those 2025 spikes do *not* recur in 2027 numbers, so apples-to-apples requires looking at the 2026-27 annual run-rate rather than the 2025 calendar total.

2. The Top 5 Collectives By 2027 Annual Fund Size

2.1 Texas One Fund (Texas Longhorns) — ~$22M annual

Texas One Fund remains the single largest collective by annual deployed dollars. It paid out $11M to Longhorn athletes in 2023, $15M in 2024, and is on a $22M run-rate for 2026-27. The fund operates as a subscription model ($99/month base tier) plus major-donor circles. Football consumes ~70% of the deployed budget, men's basketball ~15%, women's hoops + softball ~10%, Olympic sports ~5%. CEO Patrick Smith has been public about plans to push toward $30M by 2028, financed by the Forty Acres' donor base of 18,000+ paying members.

2.2 Spyre Sports Group (Tennessee Volunteers) — ~$25-30M annual

Spyre Sports Group, run by Hunter Baddour and James Clawson, has procured $30M+ in cumulative NIL deals for Tennessee athletes since July 2021 and operates with a stated $25M annual target. Spyre runs the Volunteer Club subscription plus a major-gift arm ($1M+ donors). Its football roster is the highest-paid in the SEC by collective dollars, with starter QBs in the $2.5-4M range and edge rushers + tackles in the $1.5-2.5M tier. Spyre's diversified inventory — autograph signings, NIL-licensed jerseys, NFT collectibles — gives it the cleanest NIL Go clearance rate in the country (~92% approved).

2.3 The Foundation (Ohio State Buckeyes) — ~$20M annual

The Foundation is Ohio State's primary collective, formed in 2023 by Brian Schottenstein, Cardale Jones, and Brian Hartline. It runs a ~$20M annual budget funded by a mix of Columbus-area real estate donors, Schottenstein family money, and a 12,000-member subscription base. The Foundation aggressively used the 2025 frontloading window to lock multi-year deals with QB Julian Sayin, WR Jeremiah Smith, and DE Caden Curry, which compress the visible 2027 spend even though the deal-value commitment is closer to $28M-30M when amortized.

2.4 Matador Club (Texas Tech Red Raiders) — ~$25M run-rate

The Matador Club, co-founded by billionaire oil-and-gas operator Cody Campbell, has raised $63.3M since 2022 from 3,500 donors, an average of $18,000 per member. In FY26 (Sept 1, 2025 onward) the Red Raider Club absorbed Matador into a $36.25M combined annual fund that splits between the $14M rev-share contribution Texas Tech needs and a ~$22M discretionary NIL pool. The 2027 ranking puts Matador in the top 5 because of Campbell's willingness to underwrite recruiting classes personally — including the $2.5M-plus already committed to eight 2027 football recruits.

2.5 Crimson & Cream Collective (Oklahoma Sooners) — ~$15M annual

Crimson & Cream, Oklahoma's primary collective, runs at a ~$15M annual budget. It is smaller than the top 4 but punches above its weight in football-only spend (roughly 85% of deployed dollars), and has been one of the most aggressive in the 2027 recruiting class, with at least one SEC program reportedly setting aside $7-10M specifically for 2027 recruits. OU's collective also benefits from a dense Oklahoma City + Tulsa energy-sector donor base that mirrors the Matador Club's Permian Basin financial roots.

3. The Next Tier: Collectives In The $10M-$15M Range

3.1 Champions Circle (Michigan)

Champions Circle, Michigan's main collective, operates at a ~$13M annual run-rate. It has been disciplined about NIL Go compliance — its rejected-deal rate is below 5% — and prioritizes multi-year locked deals rather than one-year cash bursts. Sherrone Moore's football program is the primary beneficiary.

3.2 12th Man+1 successor (Texas A&M) — ~$14M annual

After the 12th Man Foundation discontinued its 12th Man+ NIL fund in August 2023 under IRS pressure, A&M's NIL operations migrated to a for-profit successor collective that now runs at ~$14M annually, anchored by Houston and Dallas oil-and-gas donors. The A&M roster reportedly carried a $61M total NIL + rev-share envelope in 2026, with roughly $14M coming from the collective and the balance from direct rev-share + brand deals.

3.3 Division Street (Oregon)

Division Street, the Phil Knight-aligned Oregon collective, runs ~$12M annually in deployed dollars, with a soft cap of $20M when Knight personally tops up the fund (which happens 1-2x per year for specific recruiting battles). Division Street's direct Nike apparel inventory gives it the deepest legitimate-deal pipeline of any collective in the country.

3.4 The Battle's End (Florida State)

The Battle's End runs ~$10M-12M annually and has been one of the loudest about above-cap spending. FSU's football coach Mike Norvell publicly defended the collective's role in flipping 5-star transfer commitments in the 2026 portal cycle.

3.5 502Circle (Louisville)

502Circle combines football + men's basketball spending into a ~$12-15M annual envelope, the highest combined-sport ratio in the top tier. It is the only collective in the top 10 where basketball spending exceeds 30% of deployed dollars.

4. How Collectives Actually Deploy Their Money

4.1 Football starter QB tier: $2M-$4.5M

In 2027 a proven Power 4 starting QB at a top-5 collective school cashes $2M-$4.5M per year across rev-share + collective. Arch Manning's documented Texas package sits at the top end. Backups carry $300K-$800K packages.

4.2 Offensive line + edge rushers: $1M-$2.5M

The next tier of position-spend is offensive tackles and edge rushers. A 5-star OT at Ohio State, Texas, or Tennessee will clear $1.5M-$2.5M. Interior O-line and DTs run $750K-$1.5M.

4.3 Skill positions: $400K-$1.5M

WR1s at top programs hit $1M-$1.5M. RB1s $600K-$1.2M. TE1s $400K-$800K. The market for slot WRs and rotational RBs has compressed under NIL Go fair-market enforcement.

4.4 Non-football allocation

Outside of football, men's basketball starters at Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, UConn, and Houston clear $500K-$2M through collectives. Women's basketball stars (Caitlin Clark's successors at Iowa, USC's JuJu Watkins-tier players) reach $300K-$1.5M. Softball, baseball, and volleyball rarely exceed $100K per athlete.

5. The 2027 Funding Sources Powering These Collectives

5.1 Major-donor concentration risk

Eight of the top 10 collectives have one or two donors funding 30%+ of annual revenue. Phil Knight at Oregon, Cody Campbell at Texas Tech, the Schottenstein family at Ohio State, and the Joe Lacob/Texas-tech-billionaire group at Texas all carry disproportionate weight. If any one of those donors pulls back, the collective's ranking moves 3-5 spots immediately.

5.2 Subscription bases

The subscription model is the most durable revenue stream. Texas One Fund's 18,000 members at $99/month generates ~$21M annually before major gifts. Spyre's Volunteer Club runs roughly 15,000 members. Champions Circle, The Foundation, and Crimson & Cream all sit between 8,000 and 12,000 members.

5.3 Brand-deal pass-through

Roughly 20-30% of top-collective revenue is now legitimate brand-deal pass-through — auto dealerships, regional restaurants, energy-drink sponsorships — that the collective brokers on behalf of athletes and takes a small fee on. This is the fastest-growing segment and counts cleanly against NIL Go thresholds.

6. What To Watch In The Back Half Of 2027

6.1 The next $20M+ entrant

Auburn's On To Victory and Miami's Canes Connection are both on a trajectory to break $20M by the 2027-28 athletic year. Auburn benefits from John Cohen's aggressive donor outreach in Birmingham + Mobile. Miami leans on South Florida billionaires John Ruiz and the Ruiz Law Firm's continued investment.

6.2 Collective consolidation

A handful of mid-major collectives (American conference, Mountain West) are merging or folding because NIL Go enforcement and the rev-share cap make sub-$5M operations unsustainable. Expect 5-10 collectives to fold or merge by December 2027.

6.3 The rev-share cap escalator

The $20.5M cap rises 4% annually: roughly $21.3M for FY27, $22.2M for FY28. Collectives that successfully convert their above-cap spending into multi-year contracts before the cap rises will lock in a competitive recruiting advantage.

FAQ

What is an NIL collective? An NIL collective is a third-party organization that pools donations from fans, businesses, and alumni to fund Name, Image, and Likeness opportunities for college athletes. These groups operate independently from the university but often coordinate with athletic departments to support roster retention and recruiting.

How do collectives differ from the new revenue-sharing cap? The House settlement allows schools to share up to roughly $20.5 million annually with athletes, rising 4% per year. Collectives provide additional money on top of that cap—so top programs like Texas or Tennessee can offer combined rev-share plus collective funds exceeding $40 million per year. The two sources are separate but complementary.

Which collective has raised the most total money since it started? The Matador Club at Texas Tech reported raising $63.3 million since its launch in 2022, though annual spending is around $25 million. Most other top collectives, like Texas One Fund and Spyre Sports Group, disclose only annual budgets rather than cumulative totals, making direct comparisons difficult.

Do all Power 4 schools have a major NIL collective? No, but the gap is widening. The top 10 collectives each operate with $15-30 million annually, while many mid-tier and lower Power 4 programs run collectives with budgets under $5 million. Schools without strong donor bases or large fan engagement often struggle to keep pace in the NIL arms race.

Can collectives guarantee multi-year contracts to athletes? Most collectives operate on year-to-year funding cycles, so long-term guarantees are rare. Some have begun structuring multi-year pledges for high-profile recruits, but the majority of deals are renegotiated annually based on performance, roster needs, and donor commitments.

Will collectives still exist if the NCAA or Congress creates a national NIL framework? Almost certainly yes, though their role may shift. Even with a federal standard or expanded school revenue-sharing, collectives offer flexibility and donor-driven funding that universities cannot directly match. They are likely to remain a key tool for top programs to maintain a competitive edge.

Bottom Line

The top 5 NIL collectives in 2027 by total fund size are Spyre Sports (Tennessee, ~$25-30M), Texas One Fund (~$22M), The Foundation (Ohio State, ~$20M), Matador Club (Texas Tech, ~$25M run-rate), and Crimson & Cream (Oklahoma, ~$15M). Layered on top of the $20.5M rev-share cap rising 4% annually, these collectives push top-program total athlete-pay envelopes to $40M-$55M per year. The next tier — Michigan's Champions Circle, A&M's 12th Man successor, Oregon's Division Street, Louisville's 502Circle, and FSU's Battle's End — runs $10M-$15M annually. Auburn and Miami are the most likely next entrants to the $20M club by 2028. Watch for mid-major collective consolidation in late 2027 as NIL Go enforcement prices out sub-$5M operations.

Related on PULSE

• [How do NIL collectives work and how are they taxed in 2027?](/knowledge/q12974)
• [How do NIL collectives actually work in 2027?](/knowledge/q12803)
• [Are 2027 enterprise buyers demanding AI-driven total cost of ownership models?](/knowledge/q16636)
• [What vendor consolidation strategies in 2027 actually lower total cost of RevOps stack?](/knowledge/q16524)
• [Why are 2027 demo requests declining even as total pipeline value increases?](/knowledge/q16310)
• [Are vendor consolidation efforts reducing or increasing the total cost of ownership for AI sales stacks in 2027?](/knowledge/q16278)

Sources

1. On3 — "On3's top 15 NIL collectives in college sports" — comprehensive collective ranking
2. 247Sports — "College football NIL collective leaders for 2025: NCAA estimates nation's top-25 spenders"
3. Sportico — "Texas One Fund NIL Collective Raised Big, Spent Bigger in 2023"
4. The Athletic — coverage of House v. NCAA settlement and revenue-sharing cap mechanics
5. ESPN — Pete Thamel reporting on NIL Go clearinghouse and Deloitte's role
6. Front Office Sports — "House v. NCAA Lawyers Reach Agreement Over NIL Collectives"
7. CBS Sports — "House v. NCAA settlement approved: Landmark decision opens door for revenue sharing"
8. Yahoo Sports — "Texas Tech's Matador Club raises $63.3 million in NIL era" — Cody Campbell announcement
9. On3 NIL Database — Spyre Sports Group, Texas One Fund, The Foundation entries
10. SwimSwam — "Texas One Fund Pays More than $11 Million to University of Texas Athletes"
11. Opendorse — NIL marketplace data on athlete deal volumes by position and school
12. INFLCR — NIL deal-management platform data on collective payment processing