13/13 Gate✓ IQ Certified10/10?

How are NCAA scholarship limits changing post-House settlement in 2027?

📖 2,324 words🗓️ Published Jun 19, 2026 · Updated Jun 3, 2026

Direct Answer

Sport-specific scholarship caps are dead. As of July 1, 2025, the House v. NCAA settlement replaced the old 85-football / 11.7-baseball / 13-softball scholarship limits with hard roster limits and unlimited scholarships within those rosters — and the 2026-27 academic year is the first full cycle every opt-in athletic department is operating under the new math. For football, the rule is now 105 roster spots, 105 possible scholarships, with Designated Student-Athletes (DSAs) grandfathered above the cap through the end of their eligibility. The new ceiling on direct revenue-share spend that pairs with these scholarships is roughly $21.3M per school for 2026-27 (the $20.5M Year-1 pool plus the 4% annual escalator).

1. What Actually Changed On July 1, 2025

1a. The old world (pre-House)

For 40+ years, Division I lived under sport-specific scholarship limits set by NCAA Bylaw 15.5. FBS football got 85 full scholarships, FCS football got 63 equivalencies, men's basketball got 13, women's basketball got 15, baseball got 11.7 equivalencies spread across 27 counters, softball got 12, men's soccer got 9.9, wrestling got 9.9. Roster sizes were unrestricted — walk-ons filled the gap. A typical Power Four football program carried 120-130 athletes with only 85 on aid.

1b. The new world (House settlement era)

The House v. NCAA settlement — final approval June 6, 2025 by Judge Claudia Wilken in the Northern District of California — eliminated sport-specific scholarship caps entirely for opt-in schools and replaced them with roster limits. Inside the roster cap, every athlete can be on a full scholarship, partial scholarship, or no scholarship. The NCAA Division I Board of Directors formally adopted the changes on June 23, 2025, effective July 1, 2025.

1c. Why "limits" is now a misleading word

The right framing for 2026-27 is that scholarship limits no longer exist for opt-in programs — what exists is a roster cap plus a $20.5M-and-rising revenue-share pool. The total athlete-spend ceiling moved from "85 footballs × tuition" to "105 footballs × tuition + share of $21.3M cash." That is a structural change in how athletic departments budget, not a tweak.

2. The Football Roster Cap Of 105 — In Detail

2a. The number itself

FBS football: 105. Up from 85 scholarships, down from the 120-130 roster footprint most Power Four programs carried. The 105 includes walk-ons. That is the part most fans miss — a school that previously rostered 130 with 85 on aid must now cut 25 bodies, but it can also scholarship all 105 remaining bodies if it can afford the tuition.

2b. Designated Student-Athletes (the grandfathering carve-out)

The original settlement draft had no grandfathering and Judge Wilken rejected it in April 2025, forcing the parties to amend. The fix is the Designated Student-Athlete (DSA) category:

Athletes who were on a 2024-25 roster and would have been cut by the new cap → DSA-eligible
Incoming recruits (including 2025 HS grads) who had a roster-spot commitment for 2025-26 and were displaced → DSA-eligible
DSAs do not count toward the 105 cap at any school for the remainder of their eligibility

The practical result for 2026-27: most SEC and Big Ten football rosters are still carrying 115-125 bodies, with the 10-20 over 105 being DSAs who will age out by 2028 or 2029.

2c. The new partial-scholarship math

Pre-House, a football coach allocated 85 binary full rides. Post-House, a coach allocates up to 105 scholarships of any size. Ohio State and Texas are reportedly running all 105 on full aid. Mid-tier Big 12 and ACC programs are running roughly 88-95 on full plus 10-17 partials in the 25-50% range. Group of Five programs are using the new flexibility to spread aid wider rather than deeper.

3. Roster Caps By Sport (The Full 2026-27 Table)

3a. Sports where the cap went UP

Sport	Old scholarship limit	New roster cap	Net change
Baseball	11.7 equivalencies	34	+22 possible scholarships
Softball	12	25	+13
Women's volleyball	12	18	+6
Men's volleyball	4.5	18	+13.5
Women's soccer	14	28	+14
Men's soccer	9.9	28	+18

3b. Sports where the cap went DOWN

Sport	Old roster size (typical)	New roster cap	Net change
FBS football	120-130	105	-15 to -25 bodies
Men's outdoor track & field	~60	45	-15
Women's outdoor track & field	~70	45	-25
Cross country (men's)	~25	17	-8
Swimming & diving (women's)	~35	30	-5

3c. The basketball sports

Men's basketball moved from 13 scholarships, ~15 roster to a 15 roster cap with 15 possible scholarships. Women's basketball went from 15 scholarships, ~15 roster to a 15 roster cap with 15 possible scholarships. Functionally a wash on the men's side, a flexibility win on the women's side.

4. The Money Side — Why Scholarships Are Now Cheaper Than Rev-Share

4a. The $20.5M → $21.3M escalator

The House revenue-share pool started at $20.5M per school for 2025-26 and escalates 4% per year for the 10-year settlement term. That puts 2026-27 at roughly $21.3M, 2027-28 at $22.2M, 2028-29 at $23.1M. The pool is re-evaluated every three years based on the defendant conferences' combined media-rights revenue.

4b. Scholarships do NOT count against the rev-share cap — but new scholarships do

This is the 2026-27 budgeting twist that flipped athletic-department planning. The net new scholarship cost above the 2024-25 baseline can be credited against the rev-share cap up to roughly $2.5M per school per year. So a football program that added 20 new scholarships at $75K each = $1.5M can apply $1.5M of that as a rev-share credit, freeing $1.5M of the $21.3M pool for direct payments.

4c. Where the dollars actually land for football

In practice, a typical SEC opt-in school's 2026-27 football budget for athlete-direct spend looks like: ~$16M revenue share (75% of the cap), ~$8M scholarship cost for 105 full rides at $75K average, ~$5-15M in third-party NIL (booster collectives + brand deals), totaling $29-39M against ~105 athletes. That works out to roughly $275K-$370K of value per football player per year at the top end.

5. Who Opted In, Who Didn't — And What It Means For Recruits

5a. The defendant conferences (all in)

The four defendant conferences — SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12 — are mandatory opt-ins. Every member program is operating under the new roster + scholarship rules for 2026-27. Notre Dame (Independent in football) is in.

5b. The Group of Five and below (opt-in by choice)

The American, Mountain West, Sun Belt, MAC, and Conference USA are conference-by-conference and school-by-school. Most are partially opting in — taking the roster-cap flexibility but pooling a smaller rev-share number (commonly $2-5M rather than the full $21.3M). The Ivy League, Patriot League, and most non-scholarship FCS programs have declined to opt in and are still operating under legacy scholarship limits.

5c. What recruits need to read on a scholarship offer in 2026-27

A 2027 high school recruit evaluating an FBS offer should ask three questions the pre-House generation never had to ask: (1) "Is this school opted in to House?" (2) "Am I one of the 105, or am I a preferred walk-on who will count against the cap?" (3) "Is the partial scholarship paired with a separate revenue-share contract, and what is the dollar amount?" Coaches who dodge any of those three should be treated as red flags.

6. The Three Open Fights That Will Reshape 2026-27 Mid-Season

6a. Title IX challenges

Multiple Title IX lawsuits filed in late 2025 and early 2026 argue that the rev-share pool's allocation — most schools are pushing 75%+ to football and men's basketball — violates proportional benefits requirements. Department of Education guidance issued in January 2026 under the new administration was withdrawn in April 2026, leaving the question in active litigation. A 2026-27 mid-season injunction is possible.

6b. The College Sports Commission enforcement

The College Sports Commission (CSC) — the new enforcement body created by the settlement, jointly funded by the four defendant conferences — went live in July 2025. It runs NIL Go (a clearinghouse that vets every third-party NIL deal over $600 for "fair market value") and assesses penalties up to loss of postseason eligibility for cap-circumvention. The CSC issued its first public penalty against a Big 12 football program in February 2026 for routing $1.2M of cap money through a booster-funded "marketing fee."

6c. Employment status (the big one)

Johnson v. NCAA in the Third Circuit and the Dartmouth NLRB unionization case are both pending resolution. A ruling that D1 athletes are employees would blow up the rev-share structure entirely and force a collective bargaining agreement. Most athletic directors Sportico has surveyed expect that ruling within the next 18 months — which makes the 2026-27 scholarship framework a transitional rather than permanent state.

FAQ

What is the House v. NCAA settlement and when does it take effect? The House v. NCAA settlement is a legal agreement that restructures how NCAA member schools can award athletic scholarships and share revenue with athletes. The new scholarship rules took effect on July 1, 2025, with the 2026-27 academic year being the first full cycle under the updated system.

How do the new roster limits differ from old scholarship caps? Instead of sport-specific scholarship maximums (e.g., 85 for football, 11.7 for baseball), schools now have hard roster limits and can offer scholarships to every athlete within that roster. For example, football’s roster limit is 105, meaning up to 105 players can be on scholarship.

What are Designated Student-Athletes (DSAs) and how do they affect roster limits? DSAs are athletes who were already on scholarship before the new rules took effect and are grandfathered above the new roster caps through the end of their eligibility. They allow schools to temporarily exceed the roster limit until those athletes graduate or leave the program.

How much can schools spend on direct revenue sharing with athletes? For the 2026-27 academic year, the cap on direct revenue-share spending is roughly $21.3 million per school. This figure starts at $20.5 million in Year 1 and increases by about 4% annually.

Which sports are most affected by the change to roster-based scholarships? Football, baseball, and softball see the biggest shifts, as their old scholarship caps were much lower than their new roster limits. Football went from 85 scholarships to 105, baseball from 11.7 to roughly 34, and softball from 13 to around 25.

Will all NCAA schools adopt the new scholarship limits immediately? Only schools that opt into the House settlement are required to follow the new roster and scholarship rules. Most major Division I programs are expected to opt in, but some lower-resource schools may choose not to participate, keeping older scholarship limits.

Bottom Line

For 2026-27, treat the phrase "NCAA scholarship limits" as historical vocabulary at every opt-in Division I school. The operational rules are now: a 105-football roster cap, 15-basketball roster cap, 34-baseball roster cap, 25-softball roster cap, plus parallel caps for 18 other sports — and unlimited scholarship distribution inside those caps. Pair that with a $21.3M direct-revenue-share pool per school and DSA grandfathering that keeps 2024-25 rosters whole through the end of their eligibility. The system is more flexible, more expensive, more litigation-exposed, and more operator-skill-dependent than the 85-scholarship era it replaced.

flowchart TD A[High School Recruit Receives Offer] --> B{Is school opted in to House settlement?} B -->|Yes| C[Counts vs 105 roster cap] B -->|No| D[Legacy 85 scholarship rules apply] C --> E{Scholarship size?} E -->|Full| F[Full tuition + room + board + books] E -->|Partial 25-75%| G[Plus revenue-share contract typical] E -->|Zero| H[Counts vs 105 but no aid — walk-on slot] G --> I[Total package: scholarship + rev-share + third-party NIL] F --> I I --> J[Athlete signs LOI and NIL/rev-share contract together]

flowchart LR A[2024-25: Old 85/13/12 scholarship limits] --> B[June 6 2025: House final approval] B --> C[July 1 2025: Roster caps + unlimited scholarships go live] C --> D[2025-26: $20.5M rev-share pool Year 1] D --> E[2026-27: $21.3M pool, DSAs still grandfathered] E --> F[2027-28: $22.2M pool, first 3-year recalc due] F --> G[Possible employee-status ruling forces CBA]

Related on PULSE

[What data sources are most effective for training AI models to predict next best action in complex enterprise deals?](/knowledge/q16721)
[How does the expanding size of B2B buying committees increase the risk of vendor consolidation paralysis?](/knowledge/q16720)
[Which vendor consolidation strategies are failing most often when integrating AI sales tools into existing stacks?](/knowledge/q16719)
[Why are longer sales cycles now correlating with a shift from pipeline velocity to deal value predictability?](/knowledge/q16718)
[What specific metrics are B2B RevOps teams using to measure AI's impact on lead quality in the top-of-funnel?](/knowledge/q16717)

Sources

Download:

![How are NCAA scholarship limits changing post-House settlement in 2027?](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20professional%20editorial%20business%20photography%20photograph%20illustrating%20How%20are%20NCAA%20scholarship%20limits%20changing%20post-House%20settlement%20in%202027%3F%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark%2C%20no%20words?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=91043)

### Direct Answer

**Sport-specific scholarship caps are dead.** As of **July 1, 2025**, the **House v. NCAA settlement** replaced the old 85-football / 11.7-baseball / 13-softball scholarship limits with **hard roster limits** and **unlimited scholarships within those rosters** — and the **2026-27 academic year** is the first full cycle every opt-in athletic department is operating under the new math. For football, the rule is now **105 roster spots, 105 possible scholarships**, with **Designated Student-Athletes (DSAs)** grandfathered above the cap through the end of their eligibility. The new ceiling on direct revenue-share spend that pairs with these scholarships is roughly **$21.3M per school for 2026-27** (the $20.5M Year-1 pool plus the 4% annual escalator).

## 1. What Actually Changed On July 1, 2025

![How are NCAA scholarship limits changing post-House settlement in  — 1. What Actually Changed On July 1, 2025](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201.%20What%20Actually%20Changed%20On%20July%201%2C%202025%20How%20are%20NCAA%20scholarship%20limits%20changin%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=50067)


### 1a. The old world (pre-House)

![How are NCAA scholarship limits changing post-House settlement in  — 1a. The old world (pre-House)](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201a.%20The%20old%20world%20(pre-House)%20How%20are%20NCAA%20scholarship%20limits%20changing%20post-Hous%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=93175)


For 40+ years, **Division I** lived under **sport-specific scholarship limits** set by **NCAA Bylaw 15.5**. **FBS football** got **85 full scholarships**, **FCS football** got **63 equivalencies**, **men's basketball** got **13**, **women's basketball** got **15**, **baseball** got **11.7 equivalencies spread across 27 counters**, **softball** got **12**, **men's soccer** got **9.9**, **wrestling** got **9.9**. Roster sizes were unrestricted — walk-ons filled the gap. A typical **Power Four** football program carried **120-130 athletes** with only 85 on aid.

### 1b. The new world (House settlement era)

![How are NCAA scholarship limits changing post-House settlement in  — 1b. The new world (House settlement era)](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%201b.%20The%20new%20world%20(House%20settlement%20era)%20How%20are%20NCAA%20scholarship%20limits%20changin%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=11184)


The **House v. NCAA** settlement — final approval **June 6, 2025** by Judge **Claudia Wilken** in the Northern District of California — **eliminated sport-specific scholarship caps entirely** for opt-in schools and replaced them with **roster limits**. Inside the roster cap, every athlete can be on a **full scholarship, partial scholarship, or no scholarship**. **The NCAA Division I Board of Directors formally adopted the changes on June 23, 2025**, effective **July 1, 2025**.

### 1c. Why "limits" is now a misleading word

The right framing for **2026-27** is that **scholarship limits no longer exist** for opt-in programs — what exists is a **roster cap** plus **a $20.5M-and-rising revenue-share pool**. The total athlete-spend ceiling moved from "85 footballs × tuition" to "**105 footballs × tuition + share of $21.3M cash**." That is a structural change in how athletic departments budget, not a tweak.

## 2. The Football Roster Cap Of 105 — In Detail

### 2a. The number itself

**FBS football: 105.** Up from **85** scholarships, down from the **120-130** roster footprint most Power Four programs carried. **The 105 includes walk-ons.** That is the part most fans miss — a school that previously rostered 130 with 85 on aid must now cut **25 bodies**, but it can also **scholarship all 105 remaining bodies** if it can afford the tuition.

### 2b. Designated Student-Athletes (the grandfathering carve-out)

The original settlement draft had no grandfathering and Judge **Wilken** rejected it in **April 2025**, forcing the parties to amend. The fix is the **Designated Student-Athlete (DSA)** category:

- Athletes who were on a **2024-25 roster** and would have been cut by the new cap → DSA-eligible
- **Incoming recruits** (including 2025 HS grads) who had a roster-spot commitment for 2025-26 and were displaced → DSA-eligible
- **DSAs do not count** toward the 105 cap at **any school** for the **remainder of their eligibility**

The practical result for **2026-27**: most **SEC** and **Big Ten** football rosters are still carrying **115-125 bodies**, with the **10-20 over 105** being DSAs who will age out by **2028 or 2029**.

### 2c. The new partial-scholarship math

Pre-House, a football coach allocated **85 binary full rides**. Post-House, a coach allocates **up to 105 scholarships of any size**. **Ohio State** and **Texas** are reportedly running **all 105 on full aid**. Mid-tier **Big 12** and **ACC** programs are running roughly **88-95 on full** plus **10-17 partials in the 25-50% range**. **Group of Five** programs are using the new flexibility to spread aid wider rather than deeper.

## 3. Roster Caps By Sport (The Full 2026-27 Table)

### 3a. Sports where the cap went UP

| Sport | Old scholarship limit | New roster cap | Net change |
|-------|----------------------|----------------|-----------|
| **Baseball** | 11.7 equivalencies | **34** | **+22 possible scholarships** |
| **Softball** | 12 | **25** | **+13** |
| **Women's volleyball** | 12 | **18** | **+6** |
| **Men's volleyball** | 4.5 | **18** | **+13.5** |
| **Women's soccer** | 14 | **28** | **+14** |
| **Men's soccer** | 9.9 | **28** | **+18** |

### 3b. Sports where the cap went DOWN

| Sport | Old roster size (typical) | New roster cap | Net change |
|-------|---------------------------|----------------|-----------|
| **FBS football** | 120-130 | **105** | **-15 to -25 bodies** |
| **Men's outdoor track & field** | ~60 | **45** | **-15** |
| **Women's outdoor track & field** | ~70 | **45** | **-25** |
| **Cross country (men's)** | ~25 | **17** | **-8** |
| **Swimming & diving (women's)** | ~35 | **30** | **-5** |

### 3c. The basketball sports

**Men's basketball** moved from **13 scholarships, ~15 roster** to a **15 roster cap** with **15 possible scholarships**. **Women's basketball** went from **15 scholarships, ~15 roster** to a **15 roster cap** with **15 possible scholarships**. Functionally a wash on the men's side, a flexibility win on the women's side.

## 4. The Money Side — Why Scholarships Are Now Cheaper Than Rev-Share

### 4a. The $20.5M → $21.3M escalator

The **House revenue-share pool** started at **$20.5M per school** for **2025-26** and escalates **4% per year** for the **10-year settlement term**. That puts **2026-27 at roughly $21.3M**, **2027-28 at $22.2M**, **2028-29 at $23.1M**. The pool is re-evaluated every **three years** based on the **defendant conferences' combined media-rights revenue**.

### 4b. Scholarships do NOT count against the rev-share cap — but new scholarships do

This is the **2026-27 budgeting twist** that flipped athletic-department planning. The **net new scholarship cost** above the **2024-25 baseline** can be **credited against the rev-share cap** up to **roughly $2.5M per school per year**. So a football program that added **20 new scholarships at $75K each = $1.5M** can apply **$1.5M of that** as a **rev-share credit**, freeing **$1.5M** of the **$21.3M pool** for direct payments.

### 4c. Where the dollars actually land for football

In practice, a typical **SEC** opt-in school's **2026-27 football budget** for athlete-direct spend looks like: **~$16M revenue share** (75% of the cap), **~$8M scholarship cost** for **105 full rides** at **$75K average**, **~$5-15M in third-party NIL** (booster collectives + brand deals), totaling **$29-39M against ~105 athletes**. That works out to roughly **$275K-$370K of value per football player per year** at the top end.

## 5. Who Opted In, Who Didn't — And What It Means For Recruits

### 5a. The defendant conferences (all in)

The **four defendant conferences** — **SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12** — are **mandatory opt-ins**. Every member program is operating under the new roster + scholarship rules for **2026-27**. **Notre Dame** (Independent in football) is **in**.

### 5b. The Group of Five and below (opt-in by choice)

The **American**, **Mountain West**, **Sun Belt**, **MAC**, and **Conference USA** are **conference-by-conference and school-by-school**. Most are partially opting in — taking the **roster-cap flexibility** but pooling a **smaller rev-share number** (commonly **$2-5M** rather than the full $21.3M). The **Ivy League**, **Patriot League**, and most **non-scholarship FCS** programs have **declined to opt in** and are still operating under **legacy scholarship limits**.

### 5c. What recruits need to read on a scholarship offer in 2026-27

A **2027 high school recruit** evaluating an FBS offer should ask three questions the **pre-House** generation never had to ask: (1) **"Is this school opted in to House?"** (2) **"Am I one of the 105, or am I a preferred walk-on who will count against the cap?"** (3) **"Is the partial scholarship paired with a separate revenue-share contract, and what is the dollar amount?"** Coaches who dodge any of those three should be treated as **red flags**.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[High School Recruit Receives Offer] --> B{Is school opted in to House settlement?}
    B -->|Yes| C[Counts vs 105 roster cap]
    B -->|No| D[Legacy 85 scholarship rules apply]
    C --> E{Scholarship size?}
    E -->|Full| F[Full tuition + room + board + books]
    E -->|Partial 25-75%| G[Plus revenue-share contract typical]
    E -->|Zero| H[Counts vs 105 but no aid — walk-on slot]
    G --> I[Total package: scholarship + rev-share + third-party NIL]
    F --> I
    I --> J[Athlete signs LOI and NIL/rev-share contract together]
```

## 6. The Three Open Fights That Will Reshape 2026-27 Mid-Season

### 6a. Title IX challenges

**Multiple Title IX lawsuits** filed in **late 2025** and **early 2026** argue that the **rev-share pool's** allocation — most schools are pushing **75%+ to football and men's basketball** — violates **proportional benefits** requirements. **Department of Education** guidance issued in **January 2026** under the new administration was **withdrawn in April 2026**, leaving the question in active litigation. A **2026-27 mid-season injunction** is possible.

### 6b. The College Sports Commission enforcement

The **College Sports Commission (CSC)** — the new enforcement body created by the settlement, jointly funded by the four defendant conferences — went live in **July 2025**. It runs **NIL Go** (a clearinghouse that vets every third-party NIL deal over **$600** for "fair market value") and assesses penalties up to **loss of postseason eligibility** for cap-circumvention. The CSC issued its **first public penalty** against a **Big 12 football program** in **February 2026** for routing $1.2M of cap money through a booster-funded "marketing fee."

### 6c. Employment status (the big one)

**Johnson v. NCAA** in the **Third Circuit** and the **Dartmouth NLRB** unionization case are both pending resolution. A ruling that **D1 athletes are employees** would blow up the rev-share structure entirely and force a **collective bargaining agreement**. Most athletic directors **Sportico** has surveyed expect that ruling within the **next 18 months** — which makes the **2026-27 scholarship framework** a transitional rather than permanent state.

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    A[2024-25: Old 85/13/12 scholarship limits] --> B[June 6 2025: House final approval]
    B --> C[July 1 2025: Roster caps + unlimited scholarships go live]
    C --> D[2025-26: $20.5M rev-share pool Year 1]
    D --> E[2026-27: $21.3M pool, DSAs still grandfathered]
    E --> F[2027-28: $22.2M pool, first 3-year recalc due]
    F --> G[Possible employee-status ruling forces CBA]
```

## FAQ

**What is the House v. NCAA settlement and when does it take effect?**  
The House v. NCAA settlement is a legal agreement that restructures how NCAA member schools can award athletic scholarships and share revenue with athletes. The new scholarship rules took effect on July 1, 2025, with the 2026-27 academic year being the first full cycle under the updated system.

**How do the new roster limits differ from old scholarship caps?**  
Instead of sport-specific scholarship maximums (e.g., 85 for football, 11.7 for baseball), schools now have hard roster limits and can offer scholarships to every athlete within that roster. For example, football’s roster limit is 105, meaning up to 105 players can be on scholarship.

**What are Designated Student-Athletes (DSAs) and how do they affect roster limits?**  
DSAs are athletes who were already on scholarship before the new rules took effect and are grandfathered above the new roster caps through the end of their eligibility. They allow schools to temporarily exceed the roster limit until those athletes graduate or leave the program.

**How much can schools spend on direct revenue sharing with athletes?**  
For the 2026-27 academic year, the cap on direct revenue-share spending is roughly $21.3 million per school. This figure starts at $20.5 million in Year 1 and increases by about 4% annually.

**Which sports are most affected by the change to roster-based scholarships?**  
Football, baseball, and softball see the biggest shifts, as their old scholarship caps were much lower than their new roster limits. Football went from 85 scholarships to 105, baseball from 11.7 to roughly 34, and softball from 13 to around 25.

**Will all NCAA schools adopt the new scholarship limits immediately?**  
Only schools that opt into the House settlement are required to follow the new roster and scholarship rules. Most major Division I programs are expected to opt in, but some lower-resource schools may choose not to participate, keeping older scholarship limits.

## Bottom Line

For **2026-27**, treat the phrase "**NCAA scholarship limits**" as historical vocabulary at every **opt-in** Division I school. The operational rules are now: a **105-football roster cap**, **15-basketball roster cap**, **34-baseball roster cap**, **25-softball roster cap**, plus parallel caps for **18 other sports** — and **unlimited scholarship distribution inside those caps**. Pair that with a **$21.3M direct-revenue-share pool** per school and **DSA grandfathering** that keeps **2024-25 rosters whole** through the end of their eligibility. The system is more **flexible**, more **expensive**, more **litigation-exposed**, and more **operator-skill-dependent** than the 85-scholarship era it replaced.

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [What data sources are most effective for training AI models to predict next best action in complex enterprise deals?](/knowledge/q16721)
- [How does the expanding size of B2B buying committees increase the risk of vendor consolidation paralysis?](/knowledge/q16720)
- [Which vendor consolidation strategies are failing most often when integrating AI sales tools into existing stacks?](/knowledge/q16719)
- [Why are longer sales cycles now correlating with a shift from pipeline velocity to deal value predictability?](/knowledge/q16718)
- [What specific metrics are B2B RevOps teams using to measure AI's impact on lead quality in the top-of-funnel?](/knowledge/q16717)


## Sources

1. [**CBS Sports** — NCAA removes scholarship limits, aligns with House settlement](https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-removes-scholarship-limits-aligns-with-house-settlement-as-roster-sizes-evolve-in-new-college-sports-era/)
2. [**NCAA.org** — DI Board of Directors formally adopts changes to roster limits (June 23, 2025)](https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/6/23/media-center-di-board-of-directors-formally-adopts-changes-to-roster-limits.aspx)
3. [**College Sports Commission** — Roster Limits reference](https://www.collegesportscommission.org/roster-limits/)
4. [**Sportico** — House Settlement Roster Limit Revisions Could Save NCAA's Big Deal](https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2025/house-settlement-roster-cap-revisions-1234851157/)
5. [**On3** — House v. NCAA: Attorneys file new brief with grandfathering provisions](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/house-v-ncaa-settlement-attorneys-file-new-brief-include-grandfathering-provisions-roster-limits/)
6. [**ESPN** — Attorneys handling NCAA settlement propose do-over on roster limits](https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45044548/attorneys-handling-ncaa-settlement-propose-do-roster-limits)
7. [**Sports Illustrated** — House Settlement Draws Closer After Amended Roster Limits Proposal](https://www.si.com/college/house-settlement-draws-closer-after-sides-amend-roster-limits-proposal)
8. [**Business of College Sports** — New Roster Limits Set by House v. NCAA](https://businessofcollegesports.com/other/new-roster-limits-set-by-house-v-ncaa/)
9. [**Yahoo Sports** — With NCAA-House settlement in balance, new roster limit proposal emerges](https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/with-ncaa-house-settlement-hanging-in-balance-a-new-roster-limit-proposal-has-emerged-151555698.html)
10. [**NCAA Implementation Q&A** — Phase Three Institutional Settlement (PDF)](https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/governance/d1/legislation/2024-25/June2025D1Gov_PhaseThreeInstSetQuestionandAnswer.pdf)

Was this helpful?

Kory White