What's the minimum viable ICP agreement before sales and marketing stop arguing about 'bad' leads?

BRIEF

ICPs collapse when defined as job title + company size; they need fit criteria (technical, business, buying), objection likelihood, and deal velocity. Without these, marketing sends noise.

DETAIL

ICP Tiers (Pavilion framework)

• Tier 1 (Gold): Fits 3/4 fit criteria (budget authority, pain match, deployment window, no technical blocker). Expected win rate >35%, velocity 60-90 days.
• Tier 2 (Silver): Fits 2/4; win rate 15-30%, velocity 90-180 days. Sales will chase if pipeline thin.
• Tier 3 (Copper): Fits 1/4 or none; win rate <10%, velocity 6+ months. Marketing stops sending after 2 rejections.

Concrete Fit Criteria (Example: B2B SaaS)

Agreement Checkpoint

Build this in 2 hours (don't over-engineer):

1. Sales VP: "What's the fastest-closing deal you've won? What were the 5 attributes?"
2. Marketing VP: "Show me top 20 customers by ACV. What do 15/20 share in common?"
3. Overlap those answers; that's your gold tier.
4. Repeat for silver (mid-market, longer sales cycle).
5. Document as 1-page matrix. SaaStr uses this—teams with written ICPs report 18% higher quota attainment.

Enforcement

Marketing commits: "We send only Tier 1 + Tier 2; Tier 3 goes to nurture, not Sales." Sales commits: "We work every Tier 1 + 2 within 48 hours, even if timing looks soft." Review weekly. When Sales rejects a lead, mark which ICP tier it was; if misaligned, adjust.

TAGS: icp,lead-quality,fit-criteria,pavilion,saasR,buying-cycle,sales-marketing-alignment,quota