Top 10 Movie Franchises with the Highest Total Box Office Earnings in 2010
Quality
Certified

The 10 best movie franchises with the highest total box office earnings are ranked below on measured performance, build quality, price, and how each one actually holds up in daily use rather than how it reads on a spec sheet. Each pick lists what it costs, who it suits, and what it gives up against the one above it, so the list can be read straight down without doubling back.
1Harry Potter Franchise

Harry Potter tops the list because its seven films released through 2010 had grossed roughly $6.4 billion worldwide, the largest total of any movie franchise to that point. Warner Bros. released a new installment nearly every year starting in 2001, and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 alone added about $960 million after its November 2010 release. That combination of frequency and consistent audience turnout outpaced every other series in cumulative earnings.
This is the pick for viewers who want a fully serialized story told across eight movies over ten years, not a standalone action franchise. Each film assumes familiarity with the last, and the tone darkens considerably from the first installment to the last two. Compared to James Bond just below, Harry Potter traded decades of longevity for a shorter, denser run that still out-earned it.
2James Bond Franchise

James Bond ranks second on cumulative earnings because 22 films released between 1962 and 2008 had combined for roughly $5 billion worldwide by 2010, spread across nearly five decades. Quantum of Solace, the most recent entry in 2008, added about $586 million on its own. No other franchise on this list has matched Bond's longevity, with six different actors carrying the role across that span. Sheer volume of films, not per-movie size, drives its total.
This entry is for franchise longevity, not per-film blockbuster size — individual Bond films rarely matched a single Harry Potter or Star Wars opening. Casino Royale in 2006 was the modern high point at roughly $599 million, but most 1960s-1980s entries earned far less in nominal dollars. Compared to Harry Potter above, Bond wins on decades of output rather than concentrated box office per movie.
3Star Wars Franchise

Star Wars ranks third because its six films released between 1977 and 2005 had earned roughly $4.5 billion worldwide by 2010. The three prequel films alone, released from 1999 to 2005, brought in over $2.5 billion combined, proving the franchise's pull decades after the originals. Unlike Harry Potter or Bond, no new Star Wars film had reached theaters in the five years before 2010. Its total came entirely from re-releases and legacy ticket sales during that gap.
This ranking is for a franchise built on two distinct eras rather than continuous output — a nine-year gap separates Return of the Jedi from The Phantom Menace. Fans get consistent world-building across two trilogies but no new theatrical content during 2010 itself, unlike Twilight or Harry Potter releasing that same year. Compared to Shrek below, Star Wars earned more per film but with far longer waits between installments.
4Shrek Franchise

Shrek ranks fourth because its four films, the last of which was Shrek Forever After in May 2010, had combined for roughly $3.5 billion worldwide. Shrek 2 alone earned about $920 million in 2004, still one of animation's highest-grossing single entries. DreamWorks released a new Shrek film every two to four years, giving the franchise steady box office without the year-over-year output of Harry Potter.
This franchise is for family audiences who want broad comedy rather than the darker tone of Harry Potter or the Nolan Batman films just below it. Shrek's four movies each stood alone well enough for casual viewers to skip installments without confusion, unlike serialized franchises higher on this list. Compared to Pirates of the Caribbean, Shrek earned more total but from fewer, more consistently profitable individual releases.
5The Lord of the Rings

The Lord of the Rings ranks fifth because its three films, released in consecutive years from 2001 to 2003, had earned roughly $2.9 billion worldwide by 2010. The Return of the King alone brought in about $1.1 billion and won 11 Academy Awards, cementing the trilogy's commercial and critical standing. Unlike franchises still adding films after 2010, this trilogy's total had been fixed for seven years by the time this ranking was measured.
This is the pick for viewers who prefer a complete, closed story rather than an open-ended franchise still releasing sequels. All three films came out within three consecutive years, so there was no waiting between installments the way Star Wars fans experienced. Compared to Shrek above, Lord of the Rings earned less total from fewer films but at a noticeably higher average gross per movie.
6Pirates of the Caribbean

Pirates of the Caribbean ranks sixth because its three films released between 2003 and 2007 had combined for roughly $2.68 billion worldwide by 2010. Dead Man's Chest alone earned about $1.07 billion in 2006, at the time one of the highest-grossing films ever made. A fourth film, On Stranger Tides, was already in production but would not reach theaters until 2011, so it added nothing to this total. The trilogy's total came from just three releases in four years.
This franchise suits viewers who want big-budget spectacle and Johnny Depp's Jack Sparrow over the more grounded tone of Lord of the Rings above it. Each film ran well over two hours and leaned heavily on effects-driven sequences rather than character-driven plotting. Compared to Spider-Man just below, Pirates earned more total from the same number of films, helped by Dead Man's Chest's outsized single-film gross.
7Spider-Man Trilogy

The Spider-Man trilogy ranks seventh because its three Sam Raimi-directed films, released from 2002 to 2007, had earned roughly $2.5 billion worldwide by 2010. Spider-Man 3 alone brought in about $891 million in 2007 despite mixed reviews, showing the character's box office pull held even when critical reception dropped. No fourth film had been released by 2010; a planned sequel was later scrapped in favor of a reboot.
This entry is for viewers who want Tobey Maguire's original take on the character rather than later reboots, since none of those had released by 2010. Each film stayed under two and a half hours and centered on a single central antagonist per installment. Compared to Pirates of the Caribbean above, Spider-Man earned less overall despite a similar three-film run, reflecting Spider-Man 3's weaker per-film performance.
8The Twilight Saga

The Twilight Saga ranks eighth because its first three films, released from 2008 to 2010, had already earned roughly $1.9 billion worldwide by the end of 2010. Eclipse, the third film, brought in about $698 million after its June 2010 release, the franchise's biggest single-film total to that point. Summit Entertainment released a new Twilight film every year starting in 2008, a pace few other franchises matched. That speed compressed years of typical franchise earnings into just three.
This franchise is for the young-adult romance audience rather than viewers seeking the action or fantasy spectacle of Spider-Man or Pirates above it. Its three films leaned on a devoted teen and young-adult fanbase that returned annually rather than broad four-quadrant appeal. Compared to the Nolan Batman films just below, Twilight earned more total in less time, but from a narrower, more demographically concentrated audience.
9Christopher Nolan's Batman Films

Christopher Nolan's Batman films rank ninth because Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, released in 2005 and 2008, had combined for roughly $1.65 billion worldwide by 2010. The Dark Knight alone earned about $1.005 billion, becoming one of only a handful of films to cross $1 billion by then. With just two films by 2010, the total came from fewer releases than any other franchise ranked above it. A third film, The Dark Knight Rises, would not arrive until 2012.
This is the pick for viewers who want a grounded, crime-drama take on a superhero rather than the fantasy tone of Harry Potter or Twilight elsewhere on this list. Heath Ledger's Joker performance drove much of The Dark Knight's cultural reach beyond typical franchise marketing. Compared to Twilight above, Nolan's Batman earned less total from fewer films, but each individual entry out-grossed any single Twilight installment released by 2010.
10Toy Story Trilogy

Toy Story ranks tenth because its three films, the last being Toy Story 3 in June 2010, had combined for roughly $1.9 billion worldwide by the end of 2010. Toy Story 3 alone earned about $1.07 billion, becoming Pixar's first film to cross $1 billion and the highest-grossing animated film released to that point. Eleven years separated the second and third films, a longer wait than any other franchise on this list. Audience turnout held despite that gap.
This is the pick for viewers who want family animation rather than live-action spectacle, and who don't mind waiting years between sequels. Each Toy Story film stood on its own well enough that a decade-plus gap didn't hurt ticket sales. Compared to the Nolan Batman films above, Toy Story earned more total from one additional film, closing out this list with the strongest single per-film gross among the last four entries.
How we ranked these
This ranking totals worldwide theatrical box office grosses for every released film in a franchise through year-end 2010, using studio-reported grosses aggregated by tracking services and trade press. Films were grouped by shared characters or fictional universe rather than by studio or distributor, and each installment counted once at its lifetime theatrical gross regardless of release decade, so franchises spanning the 1970s through 2010 compete on cumulative total rather than per-film average.
Home video, merchandising, licensing, theme-park, and streaming revenue were excluded because none of those figures were reported consistently across studios in 2010. Totals were left in nominal dollars rather than inflation-adjusted, matching how trade outlets presented the numbers at the time. Unreleased or announced sequels, spinoffs not yet in theaters, and TV tie-ins were not counted toward any franchise's total.
Related questions
Why do older franchises often outrank newer blockbusters on lifetime totals?
Cumulative box office rewards volume as much as per-film size. A franchise with eight films released over three decades can out-total a franchise with two massive recent hits simply by having more releases in theaters, even if the average film underperforms newer blockbusters at the box office.
Does this ranking adjust for ticket price inflation?
No. Totals are nominal, meaning a 1977 dollar and a 2010 dollar are counted equally. Adjusted-for-inflation rankings tend to favor older franchises like Star Wars and James Bond even more heavily, since ticket prices have risen substantially since their earliest installments were released.
Are animated franchises included alongside live-action ones?
Yes, any theatrically released franchise qualifies regardless of format. Animated franchises like Shrek and Toy Story compete directly against live-action franchises like Pirates of the Caribbean and Harry Potter because the metric is worldwide theatrical gross, not genre or production method.
How is domestic versus international box office weighted?
Domestic and international grosses are summed into one worldwide total with no separate weighting. Franchises that skew heavily international, such as James Bond and Fast & Furious in later years, are not penalized or boosted relative to franchises that earn more of their total domestically.
What counts as a single franchise versus a spinoff?
Films sharing core characters, continuity, or a marketed franchise name are grouped together. Spinoffs with largely new casts and settings, even under a shared studio universe, are typically tracked separately unless marketed explicitly as part of the same numbered series.
Why does this ranking stop at 2010 instead of using current totals?
The list captures a snapshot of franchise box office standing as of that year, which matters for historical comparisons, trend analysis, and understanding how rankings shifted afterward as newer franchises like Marvel's Avengers series and Fast & Furious added billions in subsequent years.
Do 3D ticket premiums from 2009-2010 inflate certain totals?
Somewhat. Films like Alice in Wonderland and Toy Story 3 benefited from higher-priced 3D and IMAX tickets that became widespread starting in 2009, which modestly boosts their nominal grosses relative to earlier 2D-only installments in the same or rival franchises.
How reliable are studio-reported box office figures?
Generally reliable for theatrical grosses since studios have financial incentive to report accurately to exhibitors and trade trackers, though some overseas territories historically had weaker reporting standards, meaning international totals for pre-2000 films carry slightly more uncertainty than domestic figures.
FAQ
What franchise had the highest total box office earnings by 2010?
The Harry Potter franchise was among the top earners by 2010, having released six films between 2001 and 2009 that collectively grossed well over five billion dollars worldwide, a total soon to grow further with the two-part Deathly Hallows finale releasing in 2010 and 2011.
Was James Bond still competitive despite being the oldest franchise?
Yes. Spanning over twenty films since 1962, James Bond's sheer volume of releases pushed its cumulative worldwide total into the top tier of all-time franchises by 2010, even though individual installments generally earned less than modern single blockbusters.
How did Pirates of the Caribbean rank by 2010?
With four films released between 2003 and 2010, including the billion-dollar-grossing Dead Man's Chest and On Stranger Tides, Pirates of the Caribbean ranked among the highest-earning franchises of the decade despite having far fewer entries than older series.
Did Twilight crack the top ranks by 2010?
Twilight was a fast riser but had only released three of its eventual five films by 2010, so its cumulative total, while enormous relative to its budget, still trailed longer-running franchises like Harry Potter, Star Wars, and James Bond in absolute worldwide gross.
Where did Shrek and other animated franchises land?
Shrek ranked highly after four films released between 2001 and 2010, with Shrek 2 among the highest-grossing animated films ever at the time, putting the franchise's cumulative total ahead of many live-action series with similar film counts.
How did Star Wars compare to newer franchises by 2010?
Star Wars remained near the top on cumulative gross thanks to six theatrical films released between 1977 and 2005 plus strong re-release and reissue earnings, though it had not added a new theatrical entry since Revenge of the Sith five years earlier.
Did Toy Story's 2010 release change its franchise standing?
Yes, Toy Story 3's release in mid-2010 became the highest-grossing animated film to that point, pushing the three-film Toy Story franchise's cumulative total sharply upward and into direct competition with longer-running live-action series.
Was The Lord of the Rings still a top earner by 2010?
Despite only three films released between 2001 and 2003, The Lord of the Rings' cumulative worldwide gross remained competitive with much longer franchises because each installment individually ranked among the highest-grossing films of its respective release year.
How did superhero franchises like Spider-Man and X-Men rank?
Spider-Man, with three films from 2002 to 2007, and X-Men, with a similar count plus a 2009 spinoff, both placed solidly in the upper rankings by 2010, though neither yet matched the cumulative scale of Harry Potter or James Bond.
Why isn't the Marvel Cinematic Universe on a 2010 list?
By 2010 the MCU had released only Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, and set up Phase One, so its cumulative total was still comparatively modest; its explosive growth into a top-ranked franchise came later, starting with The Avengers in 2012.
Sources
- https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchise/
- https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchises
- https://variety.com
- https://www.hollywoodreporter.com
- https://www.forbes.com
- https://deadline.com
- https://www.imdb.com/list/ls000000000/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films
Related on PULSE
This page will be disappearing soon. Save it to your device for $1 — or read it free while it is here.
@Kory-White- · if Venmo asks, the last 4 of my number are 2012
This page is gone.
This one is off the shelf now. $1 keeps it on your phone for good — the whole page, pictures and diagrams included.










