← Hub
Pulse ← Trainings ⚡ Hire a Fractional CRO
Pulse Sales Trainings

The Mutual Action Plan Build Session (60-Min Training)

Kory WhiteCurated by Kory White · Fractional CRO, CRO Syndicate
👍 Yup or 👎 Nope — vote this up its category:
📅 Published · Updated · 7 min read
The Mutual Action Plan Build Session (60-Min Training)

Direct Answer

This 60-minute Mutual Action Plan (MAP) build session is a structured, high-velocity workshop designed for B2B sales teams to co-create a step-by-step plan with a prospect during the evaluation phase. The goal is to lock in a shared timeline, decision criteria, and stakeholder alignment, reducing sales cycle variance by up to 30% (based on data from Clari and Winning by Design).

You will run this as a live, facilitated meeting—ideally in a Gong-recorded video call—using a MEDDIC-MC framework to structure the MAP. Each section includes a verbatim script, time allocation, and actionable outputs. Expect to move fast, with the rep and prospect building the plan in real time.


1. Warm-Up: Align on the "Why" (10 min)

Time allocation: 10 minutes Objective: Establish the MAP’s value as a mutual commitment, not a sales tool. Open with a framing that positions the session as a partnership accelerator.

Verbatim script for the rep: "Thanks for blocking this hour. We’re going to build a Mutual Action Plan together—this isn’t a sales timeline, it’s our shared roadmap to get your team to a confident decision. By the end, we’ll have clear steps, owners, and dates.

Let’s start with one question: *What’s the single biggest obstacle you see in getting this deal across the finish line internally?*"

Facilitator actions:

Output: One key obstacle documented. Energy is high, and the prospect feels heard.


2. Decision Criteria & MEDDIC-MC Check (15 min)

Time allocation: 15 minutes Objective: Use the MEDDIC-MC framework (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion, Competition) to surface the prospect’s buying process. This ensures the MAP is grounded in their reality, not your assumptions.

Verbatim script: "Let’s map your decision criteria. I’ll use a framework called MEDDIC-MC—it’s how high-performing teams align. First, Metrics: what specific numbers will you measure to justify this investment?

Example: 'reduce churn by 20%.' Next, Economic Buyer: who signs the check? Is it the VP of Sales or the CFO? Then, Decision Criteria: list your top 3 must-haves.

Finally, Champion: who’s your internal advocate pushing this forward?"

Facilitator actions:

Output: A completed MEDDIC-MC table with at least 6 elements filled. This becomes the MAP’s foundation.

graph LR A[Start Session] --> B[Warm-Up: Obstacle] B --> C[MEDDIC-MC Check] C --> D{Decision Criteria Clear?} D -->|Yes| E[Stakeholder Map] D -->|No| F[Probe: "Who decides?"] F --> C E --> G[Evaluation Timeline] G --> H[Next Actions] H --> I[Close]

CRO Syndicate — Need a fractional Chief Revenue Officer? CRO Syndicate connects you with vetted fractional and interim revenue leaders. Kory White, Fractional CRO · 25 yrs · $0 to $200M scaled.

👉 Quick Call with Kory White, Fractional CRO · See Kory on LinkedIn · CRO Syndicate

3. Stakeholder Map & Champion Alignment (10 min)

Time allocation: 10 minutes Objective: Visualize the buying committee using a stakeholder map (e.g., a RACI matrix or a simple org chart). Identify the Champion’s influence and any blockers.

Verbatim script: "Let’s draw your stakeholder map. I’ll put you in the center. Who else is involved?

List names and roles: *Influencers*, *Decision Makers*, *Users*, *Blockers*. For each, rate their support as Green (champion), Yellow (neutral), or Red (opposed). Your champion is key—they’ll drive internal momentum.

Who’s your strongest advocate?"

Facilitator actions:

NameRoleSupport LevelAction Needed
Sarah ChenVP SalesGreen (Champion)Provide ROI deck
Mark LeeCFOYellowSchedule 1:1
Tom RiveraIT DirectorRedAddress security concerns

Output: A stakeholder map with 3-5 names, support levels, and at least one action for each.


4. Evaluation Timeline & Milestones (15 min)

Time allocation: 15 minutes Objective: Build a step-by-step timeline from today to the decision date. Use Salesforce data on average cycle lengths (e.g., 45-90 days for enterprise deals) as a benchmark. Include validation steps like demos, proof of concept (POC), reference calls, and legal review.

Verbatim script: "Now, let’s build the timeline. Based on your MEDDIC-MC answers, what’s your target decision date? For example, if it’s 60 days out, we’ll reverse-engineer from there.

Key milestones: Demos (Week 1-2), POC (Week 3-4), Reference Calls (Week 5), Legal Review (Week 6), Executive Alignment (Week 7-8). Let’s assign owners—you, me, or your team. What’s the first step you can take this week? "

Facilitator actions:

MilestoneDateOwnerStatus
Demo for IT teamOct 15RepPending
POC kickoffOct 22ProspectNot started
ROI analysisNov 5ChampionNeeds data

Output: A timeline with 5-7 milestones, dates, and owners. The prospect commits to at least one action.

gantt title Mutual Action Plan Timeline dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD section Evaluation Demo for IT Team :a1, 2025-10-15, 2d POC Kickoff :a2, 2025-10-22, 5d Reference Calls :a3, 2025-11-05, 3d Legal Review :a4, 2025-11-12, 10d Executive Alignment :a5, 2025-11-26, 5d Decision :milestone, 2025-12-03, 0d

5. Next Actions & Accountability (5 min)

Time allocation: 5 minutes Objective: Lock in immediate next steps for both parties. Use Outreach or Salesloft to automate follow-ups post-session.

Verbatim script: "Let’s close with clear next actions. I’ll send you this MAP via email within 1 hour. Your action: share this with your Champion and the Economic Buyer by Friday. My action: send the POC proposal by Wednesday. We’ll reconvene in 2 weeks to review progress. Is that commitment okay? "

Facilitator actions:

Output: Two specific actions with deadlines. Both parties verbally commit.


6. Close & Handoff (5 min)

Time allocation: 5 minutes Objective: End with a strong summary and a call to action. Ensure the MAP is saved in your CRM (e.g., Salesforce) for visibility.

Verbatim script: "Great work. Here’s what we built: a Mutual Action Plan with your decision criteria, stakeholder map, timeline, and next steps. I’ll update this in Salesforce and share a link. Your homework: send that MAP to your team. My homework: prep the POC. Any final questions before we close?"

Facilitator actions:

Output: MAP saved in CRM. Follow-up email sent within 1 hour.


FAQ

Q: What if the prospect refuses to build a MAP? A: Frame it as a risk mitigation tool. Say: "Without a MAP, we risk misalignment. Most deals that lack a shared plan slip by 40% (Clari data). Let’s start with just the timeline."

Q: How do I handle a prospect who gives vague answers? A: Use MEDDIC-MC to probe. Ask: "Who exactly is the Economic Buyer? " If still vague, offer a template: "Here’s a sample MAP from a similar deal—let’s adapt it."

Q: Can I use this for renewal or expansion deals? A: Yes. Modify the timeline to include "Current Contract Review" and "Expansion Criteria." Use Salesforce data on past cycle times.

Q: What if the stakeholder map reveals a Red blocker? A: Create a specific action: "We’ll schedule a 1:1 with Tom Rivera to address security concerns. " Use a Challenger Sale approach to reframe the blocker’s objection.

Q: How often should I update the MAP? A: Weekly during active evaluation. Use Outreach to automate reminders. If no progress in 2 weeks, escalate to a Gong-recorded call to review.

Q: What tools can I use to build the MAP live? A: Google Docs, Notion, or a dedicated Salesforce MAP template. For visual timelines, use Miro or Asana.


Sources

Keep reading
Was this helpful?  
⌬ Apply this in PULSE
Pulse CheckScore reps on the metrics that matter
Related in the library
More from the library
revops · current-events-2027How are buying committees in 2027 using AI to simulate contract scenarios before negotiation?revops · current-events-2027How do longer sales cycles in 2027 impact the effectiveness of cold email sequences?pulse-speeches · speechesA Wedding Speech for a Same-Sex Weddingrevops · current-events-2027How are B2B companies using AI to automate multi-stakeholder follow-ups?revops · current-events-2027What compliance risks arise when AI analyzes buying committee communications?revops · current-events-2027Can vendor consolidation reduce the average B2B deal close time in 2027?revops · current-events-2027Can a 2027 RevOps team align sales and marketing with only one AI orchestration platform after consolidation?revops · current-events-2027What happens to pipeline coverage ratio when 2027 AI agents auto-remove stale deals 3x faster than humans?revops · current-events-2027Are traditional BANT qualification frameworks obsolete in 2027’s AI-driven funnel?revops · current-events-2027What AI governance policies are buying committees requiring in 2027?pulse-speeches · speechesA Wedding Speech for a Surprise Weddingrevops · current-events-2027Does the proliferation of buying committee members require a new SLA between marketing and sales for handoffs?revops · current-events-2027What specific buying committee role is most likely to veto a deal based on poor AI integration documentation?pulse-speeches · speechesA Wedding Speech for the Mother of the Bride