Pulse ← Cars
Reviews and Expert Analysis · car-review

Top 10 Mid-Size SUVs 1999 — Best Overall + Best Value

👁 0 views📖 2,942 words⏱ 13 min read📅 Published

Top 10 Mid-Size SUVs 1999 — Best Overall plus Best Value

Direct Answer

The best mid-size SUV of 1999 was the Jeep Grand Cherokee (WJ), our Best Overall, which paired the brand-new 235-hp 4.7-liter PowerTech V8, the clever Quadra-Drive full-time four-wheel-drive system, and genuine trail credibility in a package that started around $26,000 (the V8 Limited climbed past $35,000).

The smartest Best Value of the year was the Toyota 4Runner SR5 V6, an almost indestructible body-on-frame truck that opened around $27,028 in 4WD trim and has aged into one of the most coveted used SUVs you can buy. The model year mattered for another reason: 1999 was the turning point when the new car-based Lexus RX300 crossover began quietly challenging the truck-based old guard, and the segment was never the same again.

How We Ranked the Top 10

This retrospective grades each 1999 mid-size SUV the way a buyer would have judged it then, weighted by how the choice looks with the benefit of hindsight. The weighting:

Sources for specs and reputation include period Car and Driver and MotorTrend archives, Edmunds historical reviews, Kelley Blue Book valuations, NHTSA records, Curbside Classic retrospectives, and the relevant Wikipedia model pages. Prices are real 1999 base MSRP figures in period dollars.

1. Jeep Grand Cherokee 🏆 BEST OVERALL

1999 MSRP: $26,000 | Best for: the buyer who wanted real trail capability and V8 muscle without going full-size

The all-new 1999 WJ Grand Cherokee was a clean-sheet redesign and it showed. The headline was the new 4.7-liter PowerTech V8 making 235 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, backed by Jeep's Quadra-Drive system that combined Quadra-Trac II with Vari-Lok progressive differentials to shuffle torque front-to-rear and side-to-side automatically.

The base 4.0-liter PowerTech inline-six delivered a stout 195 horsepower and an old-school reputation for running forever, while a properly equipped Grand Cherokee could tow up to 6,500 pounds. It was still body-on-frame in spirit but used a unibody with a separate front subframe, which gave it a more carlike ride than its truck rivals.

Today a clean WJ V8 is a sought-after modern-classic off-roader, and values for well-kept examples have started to climb.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: The most complete mid-size SUV of 1999 — capable, comfortable, and characterful all at once.

2. Toyota 4Runner 💎 BEST VALUE

1999 MSRP: $27,028 | Best for: the buyer who wanted to drive it to 300,000 miles

The third-generation 4Runner was the reliability benchmark of the class, and nothing has changed that judgment. Its 3.4-liter 5VZ-FE V6 produced 183 horsepower and 217 lb-ft of torque — modest on paper, but bolted to a rugged body-on-frame chassis and a part-time 4WD system that begged to be taken off-road.

Owners routinely report 200,000-plus miles on basic maintenance, and that legendary durability is exactly why clean 1999 examples now command strong used prices that defy normal depreciation. It rode firmer and felt more trucklike than the Grand Cherokee, but that ruggedness is the whole point.

As a long-term value proposition, then and now, nothing in the class beats it.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: The smartest money in the class — buy once, keep forever, and watch it hold value.

3. Nissan Pathfinder

1999 MSRP: $26,299 | Best for: the buyer who wanted Japanese durability with a touch more polish

The R50 Pathfinder split the difference between truck and crossover better than most. Its 3.3-liter SOHC V6 made 168 horsepower and 196 lb-ft of torque through a capable full-time-available 4WD system, wrapped in a unibody-on-frame hybrid structure that rode more smoothly than a pure ladder-frame truck.

Like the 4Runner, it earned a reputation for sailing past 200,000 miles with minimal drama. It was never the quickest or the roomiest, but it was honest, durable, and pleasant. The badge-engineered Infiniti QX4 added leather and a nicer fascia on the same bones for buyers who wanted near-luxury.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: A quietly excellent, durable choice that deserved more attention than it got.

4. Lexus RX300

1999 MSRP: $33,405 | Best for: the buyer who wanted SUV image with car comfort and zero compromise on refinement

This is the one that changed everything. The RX300 was not a truck — it was a car-based unibody crossover built on Camry-derived underpinnings, with a silky 3.0-liter V6 making 220 horsepower and a smooth four-speed automatic. There was no low range and no off-road pretense; instead you got a quiet, plush, supremely reliable luxury wagon that happened to sit a little higher and offer available all-wheel drive.

In 1999 the term "crossover" had barely entered the vocabulary, yet the RX300 quietly invented the segment that would eventually swallow the entire market. Its legacy is enormous — it is arguably the most historically important vehicle on this list.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: The future arrived in 1999, and it was wearing a Lexus badge.

5. Ford Explorer

1999 MSRP: $24,000 | Best for: the mainstream family that wanted the best-selling SUV in America

The Explorer was the runaway sales champion of the era, and for good reason: it was spacious, available with real power, and priced for the masses. The 4.0-liter SOHC V6 made 210 horsepower and 240 lb-ft of torque, while an optional 5.0-liter V8 gave it serious towing muscle.

The Control Trac four-wheel-drive system was easy to live with, and the body-on-frame platform handled trailers and gravel roads without complaint. It was never the most refined or the most reliable — transmission and later tire concerns dogged its reputation — but as an all-around family hauler at a fair price, it defined the segment for millions of buyers.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: Not the best-built, but the people's choice — and the SUV that put the whole country in one.

6. Mercury Mountaineer

1999 MSRP: $28,000 | Best for: the Explorer buyer who wanted standard V8 and a dressier badge

The Mountaineer was Mercury's upscale take on the Explorer, and it leaned into the formula well. It came standard with V8 power and an available AWD system that made it more sure-footed on pavement than the part-time-4WD Explorer. Mechanically it shared the Ford platform's strengths and weaknesses, so the same body-on-frame towing ability and the same patchy reliability applied.

What you bought was a nicer interior, a cleaner grille, and a slightly more premium feel for a modest price bump. It was a sensible way to get a more polished Explorer without paying luxury-brand money.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: A smart pick if you wanted Explorer practicality with V8 standard and a bit more class.

7. Dodge Durango

1999 MSRP: $25,000 | Best for: the buyer who needed three rows and maximum towing on a budget

The Durango was the brawler of the group. Based on the Dakota pickup, this body-on-frame truck offered available three-row seating and a thumping 5.9-liter V8 making 245 horsepower — the most powerful engine in this comparison — good for towing up to 7,200 pounds. It was big, thirsty, and trucklike, but for families that needed to haul both people and trailers, nothing else here matched its combination of space and grunt at the price.

Refinement and fuel economy were afterthoughts, and the interior was plain, but the Durango delivered exactly what it promised: full-size utility in a mid-size footprint.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: The muscle and space champion — buy it if towing and seating mattered more than polish.

8. Chevrolet Blazer

1999 MSRP: $25,000 | Best for: the GM loyalist who wanted a proven, affordable workhorse

The Blazer (and its GMC Jimmy twin) was an old-school body-on-frame SUV powered by the durable 4.3-liter Vortec V6 making 190 horsepower and a healthy 250 lb-ft of torque. The engine itself was a genuine workhorse and the Insta-Trac shift-on-the-fly 4WD — or the new-for-'99 AutoTrac electronic transfer case — made winter duty easy.

The catch was the 4WD system's reputation for electronic gremlins, which could leave you without traction at the worst moment. It was roomy, cheap, and torquey, but build quality and that finicky 4WD kept it out of the top tier.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: A solid engine wrapped in a dated, hit-or-miss package — fine value, but buy with your eyes open.

9. Oldsmobile Bravada

1999 MSRP: $31,000 | Best for: the buyer who wanted a near-luxury GM SUV with full-time AWD

The Bravada was Oldsmobile's premium spin on the Blazer/Jimmy platform, and it leaned on comfort and all-weather security rather than capability. It used the same 4.3-liter Vortec V6 with 190 horsepower, but paired it with the SmartTrak full-time all-wheel-drive system that quietly sent power where grip existed — excellent in snow when it worked.

The cabin was dressier and better equipped than its corporate cousins, justifying the higher price. The downside was the same platform's reliability questions and the curious choice to offer only a V6 when the Jeep and Ford rivals could be had with a V8.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: A comfortable, snow-ready near-luxury pick, held back by a V6-only lineup and so-so durability.

10. Mitsubishi Montero Sport

1999 MSRP: $24,000 | Best for: the value buyer who wanted distinctive styling and solid off-road bones

The Montero Sport rounded out the class as a capable, affordable, body-on-frame alternative to the Japanese mainstream. Its available 3.5-liter V6 made roughly 200 horsepower, and its part-time 4WD system gave it honest off-road manners on a rugged truck chassis. It competed head-on with the 4Runner and Pathfinder but undercut them on price, making it a genuine value play for buyers who wanted Japanese-truck durability without the premium badge.

It never matched the Toyota or Nissan for resale or refinement, and Mitsubishi's thin dealer network hurt it, but as a rugged, cheaper-to-buy option it earned its place.

Pros:

Cons:

Verdict: An underrated value-and-capability play that deserved more shoppers than it found.

Buyer Decision Tree — Which One Was Right for You?

flowchart TD A[Shopping a 1999 mid-size SUV?] --> B{Need real off-road or towing?} B -->|Yes, truck-based| C{Need V8 power?} B -->|No, want car comfort| D[Lexus RX300 unibody crossover] C -->|Yes, max muscle plus 3 rows| E[Dodge Durango 5.9L V8] C -->|Yes, balanced capability| F[Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7L V8] C -->|No, V6 is plenty| G{Top priority?} G -->|Reliability above all| H[Toyota 4Runner V6] G -->|Smooth ride plus durability| I[Nissan Pathfinder] G -->|Tight budget| J[Mitsubishi Montero Sport or Chevrolet Blazer] D --> K{Want low range too?} K -->|No, comfort wins| L[RX300 is your answer] K -->|Yes, need trail ability| F

What to Look For in a 1999 Mid-Size SUV (Then and as a Used Buy Now)

Shopping one of these today is mostly about condition and history rather than the original spec sheet:

A useful truth: outright horsepower and original MSRP matter less than nostalgia implies. These trucks were never fast, and the few extra hp between rivals made little real-world difference. What determines whether a 1999 SUV is worth owning now is how it was cared for — durability and rust resistance decide everything, which is exactly why the Toyota and Nissan command the prices they do.

FAQ

What was the best mid-size SUV of 1999? The Jeep Grand Cherokee (WJ) takes Best Overall for combining the new 235-hp 4.7L V8, Quadra-Drive 4WD, real trail ability, and a carlike unibody ride that rivals couldn't match at the price.

Which 1999 mid-size SUV was the best value? The Toyota 4Runner SR5 V6. It opened around $27,028 in 4WD trim and its near-indestructible 3.4L V6 drivetrain means clean examples still hold remarkable value today.

Was the 1999 Lexus RX300 really a mid-size SUV? Sort of — and that is the point. The RX300 was a car-based unibody crossover, not a truck, and 1999 was the moment it began challenging body-on-frame SUVs and previewed the segment that now dominates the market.

Which 1999 mid-size SUV could tow the most? The Dodge Durango with its 245-hp 5.9L V8 led the group, rated up to 7,200 pounds, with the V8 Jeep Grand Cherokee next at up to 6,500 pounds when properly equipped.

Which 1999 mid-size SUVs are most reliable today? The Toyota 4Runner and Nissan Pathfinder are the durability champions, with many owners reporting 200,000-plus miles on basic maintenance; the GM and Ford 4WD systems are the most trouble-prone.

Were these body-on-frame or unibody? Most were truck-based body-on-frame (4Runner, Explorer, Durango, Blazer, Montero Sport), while the Lexus RX300 was a car-based unibody and the Jeep Grand Cherokee used a unibody with a separate front subframe.

Bottom Line

The 1999 mid-size SUV class was the high-water mark of the truck-based era, just as the ground was shifting beneath it. If you wanted the most complete package, the Jeep Grand Cherokee was the one to own — capable, V8-strong, and surprisingly refined. If you wanted the smartest long-term money, the Toyota 4Runner was unbeatable then and is a genuine modern classic now.

And if you were paying attention, the Lexus RX300 was quietly rewriting the rules: within a decade, the car-based crossover it pioneered would push nearly every truck on this list into history.

Sources

*Mid-size SUV review — 1999 mid-size SUV reviews, rating, best mid-size SUV 1999, and a retrospective review of the top vintage SUV picks for buyers.*

Keep reading
Was this helpful?  
Related in the library
More from the library
electronic-review · top-10Top 10 Outlet Testers in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Red Light Therapy Devices in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Cordless Caulk Guns in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Digital Torque Wrenches in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Shop Dust Collectors in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Compact Sedans 2025 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Mid-Size Pickup Trucks 2024 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Mid-Size SUVs 2025 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Compact Sedans 2024 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Pickup Trucks 1995 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Smart Weighted Hula Hoops in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Thickness Planers in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valueelectronic-review · top-10Top 10 Cordless Ratchets in 2027 — Best Overall + Best Valuecar-review · top-10Top 10 Minivans 2026 — Best Overall + Best Value