13/13 Gate✓ IQ Certified10/10?

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training

Curated by Kory White · Fractional CRO · Maryland

📖 2,314 words🗓️ Published Aug 1, 2026

Direct Answer

Austin Peay's 2027 NIL go-to-market strategy centers on a documented, inspectable pipeline: a funded collective, House-settlement revenue-sharing budget mapped to roster needs, tiered athlete offers with dated disclosure, and a weekly cadence the AD and collective GM review. This 60-minute session forces every staffer to log one real athlete or donor target before the portal opens.

Why a mid-major program needs a written NIL playbook

For a program at Austin Peay's level — an FCS football and full D1 athletics department in Clarksville, Tennessee, competing in the United Athletic Conference for football and the ASUN in most other sports — NIL money is scarce relative to the Power Four, so every dollar has to be tracked, justified, and defended. The programs that lose recruits in 2027 are not the ones with the smallest budgets; they are the ones whose offers live in group texts and donor phone calls instead of a shared system the athletic director and collective general manager can inspect before a portal window opens.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 1

Since the NCAA's July 2021 interim policy legalized name, image, and likeness compensation, and especially since the House v. NCAA settlement took effect for the 2025–26 year, the operating model has shifted twice. First, third-party collectives became the primary funding vehicle. Second, the settlement introduced direct institutional revenue sharing — schools may now pay athletes directly up to an annual cap (roughly $20.5M across an entire athletic department in year one, rising over the ten-year settlement term). A school like Austin Peay will not spend anywhere near that ceiling, which makes the allocation decision harder, not easier: with a small pool, you cannot fund everyone, so the strategy is fundamentally about prioritization and disclosure hygiene.

The room rule for this session is simple: no logged offer sheet, budget line, or donor stage means no new public NIL commitment until the collective president signs off. Undocumented promises are how mid-major programs end up with compliance gaps that surface after a public announcement, or donors who heard three different versions of the same deal.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 2

Standing up the collective and revenue-share stack

The 2027 stack for a program this size has three layers that must reconcile to a single roster plan. Layer one is the institutional revenue-sharing pool governed by the House settlement — direct payments the athletic department budgets and administers under Deloitte's clearinghouse (NIL Go) review for any third-party deal above the reporting threshold. Layer two is the collective, a separate donor-funded entity that supplements the cap with genuine endorsement and appearance work. Layer three is genuine market NIL — local businesses, autograph sessions, camps, and social promotion where the athlete delivers real commercial value.

The tooling should be boring and auditable. Compliance and disclosure platforms like Opendorse, INFLCR (Teamworks), and Basepath are the established vendors athletes and departments use to log deals, route payments, and file the disclosures state law and the clearinghouse require. On3's NIL valuation data gives a public sanity check on what an athlete's market might reasonably be. The point of naming the system in the training is so no staffer can say "I wasn't sure where to record it" — every offer maps to a field, a stage, and a dollar figure.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 4

A realistic funding model for an FCS-level football roster spreads a modest six-figure-to-low-seven-figure collective pool unevenly: a handful of difference-making transfers or retained starters carry meaningful deals, a middle band gets modest appearance-based agreements, and the remainder participate in team-wide or camp-based opportunities. Trying to pay everyone equally is how a small collective runs dry by October. The trade-off every staffer must internalize is that a dollar promised to retain a proven quarterback is a dollar unavailable for portal insurance in the spring — and both decisions have to be visible on the same sheet.

Running the 60-minute working session

This is a working session, not a lecture. The manager — here the collective GM or the deputy AD who owns NIL — facilitates, and every attendee arrives with one real athlete or donor target where the 2027 strategy is either the blocker or the unlock. The hour breaks into blocks that sum to exactly sixty minutes and end with a written commitment.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 5

Frame (0:00–0:08, 8 minutes). Connect budget credibility to inspectable records. The GM opens with one real case where the program skipped this discipline and paid for it — a recruit lost to a rival collective because the counter-offer was never formalized, or a disclosure filed late. Each attendee opens their tracking platform and creates a record titled with the athlete name and today's date before the timer ends.

Teach the layers (0:08–0:20, 12 minutes). Walk the four things every record must carry: the athlete's tier and roster need, the funding source (rev-share vs. collective vs. market deal), the compliance and disclosure status, and the next dated action. Ban adjectives — only names, dollar figures, and dates. If a staffer cannot cite where a number came from, the row is flagged as a due-diligence gap.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 6

Solo build (0:20–0:35, 15 minutes). Silent completion of the worksheet on one live target. No side conversations, no Slack. This is where the real thinking happens.

Pair pressure-test (0:35–0:48, 13 minutes). One person plays the skeptical donor or the compliance officer; the other defends the deal with documented evidence only. Vague claims get challenged in the room, not after a check is written.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 7

The rational no (0:48–0:56, 8 minutes). When to walk, when to hold budget in reserve, and when to downgrade a target. A small collective's discipline is defined by the offers it declines, not the ones it makes.

Commit (0:56–1:00, 4 minutes). Round-robin: athlete, one-sentence plan, next action date, funded yes/no. Any commitment without tonight's record gets discussed first in the Monday review and is not treated as funded until documented. Total: 8 + 12 + 15 + 13 + 8 + 4 = 60 minutes.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 8

Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure discipline

Tiering is the strategy's backbone because it converts a scarce pool into defensible decisions. A workable four-tier model for 2027: Tier 1 — proven, difference-making returners and marquee transfers who move win totals; these carry the largest deals and the tightest retention plans. Tier 2 — reliable starters and high-upside developmental players worth a real but modest agreement. Tier 3 — depth and special-teams contributors participating in team-wide or appearance-based opportunities. Tier 4 — walk-ons and freshmen on market NIL only (camps, local promotion) until they earn a roster role.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 9

Each tier has a target dollar band and a disclosure expectation. The disclosure discipline is non-negotiable in 2027: under the House framework, third-party deals above the reporting threshold route through the Deloitte-run clearinghouse for a fair-market-value check, and Tennessee's state NIL statute plus school policy govern what must be filed and when. A deal that clears the money but skips the paperwork is a liability, not a win. The worksheet forces the athlete's disclosure status into the same row as the dollar figure so the two never drift apart.

The most common mid-major mistake is treating NIL as a single recruiting-weekend splash instead of a retention program. The transfer portal makes retention the highest-ROI spend: keeping a developed junior is cheaper and lower-risk than buying an unproven transfer to replace one who left because the collective never made a proactive offer. Build the calendar around portal windows — knowing the exact open dates for 2027 and having funded retention offers documented before they open is the entire game.

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 10

Measuring whether the NIL motion is working

You cannot manage a scarce pool on vibes. Track a small, honest set of metrics weekly in a shared dashboard the AD, the GM, and compliance all see. First, budget-to-plan: committed dollars versus the roster plan, by tier, so overspend in one position group is visible before it starves another. Second, retention rate through portal windows: the share of targeted returners who stayed, which is the clearest signal that proactive offers beat reactive panic. Third, disclosure completeness: the percentage of active deals with filed, current paperwork — anything under 100% is a compliance risk sitting in the open. Fourth, donor fulfillment: pledged versus collected collective dollars, because a promise on a spreadsheet is not money in an athlete's account.

The review cadence should be weekly during active recruiting and retention periods and can relax to bi-weekly in the offseason. The failure mode to guard against is letting the review become a status meeting where people narrate updates instead of inspecting records. Anchor it to the dashboard: open the four metrics, drill into any red number, assign a dated owner, and end. When the collective GM can open the tracking platform on any night and see a current record on every committed athlete, the program has a real go-to-market motion instead of a rumor mill.

FAQ

How long should this training run? Sixty minutes is the working-session default. A quarterly planning kickoff can extend to ninety minutes with longer scenario work, but never compress below sixty — the pair pressure-test block, where deal quality actually improves, is the part that gets cut first and matters most.

Should the AD or the collective GM facilitate? The GM facilitates because they own the pipeline day to day; the AD participates and provides the budget authority and final sign-off. Coaches attend as stakeholders but do not run the room, since the goal is documentation discipline, not recruiting pitches.

What tools should we standardize on? Use an established disclosure and payment platform such as Opendorse, INFLCR/Teamworks, or Basepath so every deal is logged and routable for compliance, and use public NIL valuation data as a market sanity check. The specific vendor matters less than picking one and using it for every deal.

How does this fit with compliance and state law? It sits on top of them. Tennessee's NIL statute, school policy, and the House clearinghouse define what must be disclosed; this session's job is to make sure the disclosure status is captured on the same record as the money so nothing ships without paperwork.

What is the biggest mistake mid-major programs make? Treating NIL as a one-time recruiting splash instead of a retention program. The transfer portal makes keeping developed players the highest-return spend, so a documented, proactive retention offer before a portal window beats a reactive bidding war every time.

How do we know it is working? Track four things weekly: committed budget versus roster plan by tier, retention rate through portal windows, disclosure completeness, and donor pledge-to-collection. If retention holds and disclosures stay current while spend stays inside the plan, the motion is working.

Sources

flowchart TD S["2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Aus"] S --> N0["Why a mid-major program needs a writte"] N0 --> N1["Standing up the collective and revenue"] N1 --> N2["Running the 60-minute working session"] N2 --> N3["Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure "]

flowchart LR C["2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Aus"] C --> H0["Standing up the collective and revenue"] C --> H1["Running the 60-minute working session"] C --> H2["Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure "] C --> H3["Measuring whether the NIL motion is wo"] ![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 3](/assets/qa/st97-b3.jpg)

Related on PULSE

[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Texas A&m-commerce D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st117)
[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Tennessee Tech D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st116)
[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Southeastern Louisiana D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st115)
[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR South Dakota D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st113)
[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Rhode Island D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st111)
[2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Northern Colorado D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st109)

Download:

## Direct Answer

Austin Peay's 2027 NIL go-to-market strategy centers on a documented, inspectable pipeline: a funded collective, House-settlement revenue-sharing budget mapped to roster needs, tiered athlete offers with dated disclosure, and a weekly cadence the AD and collective GM review. This 60-minute session forces every staffer to log one real athlete or donor target before the portal opens.

## Why a mid-major program needs a written NIL playbook

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  S["2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Aus"]
  S --> N0["Why a mid-major program needs a writte"]
  N0 --> N1["Standing up the collective and revenue"]
  N1 --> N2["Running the 60-minute working session"]
  N2 --> N3["Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure "]
```


For a program at Austin Peay's level — an FCS football and full D1 athletics department in Clarksville, Tennessee, competing in the United Athletic Conference for football and the ASUN in most other sports — NIL money is scarce relative to the Power Four, so every dollar has to be tracked, justified, and defended. The programs that lose recruits in 2027 are not the ones with the smallest budgets; they are the ones whose offers live in group texts and donor phone calls instead of a shared system the athletic director and collective general manager can inspect before a portal window opens.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 1](/assets/qa/st97-b1.jpg)



Since the NCAA's July 2021 interim policy legalized name, image, and likeness compensation, and especially since the House v. NCAA settlement took effect for the 2025–26 year, the operating model has shifted twice. First, third-party collectives became the primary funding vehicle. Second, the settlement introduced direct institutional revenue sharing — schools may now pay athletes directly up to an annual cap (roughly $20.5M across an entire athletic department in year one, rising over the ten-year settlement term). A school like Austin Peay will not spend anywhere near that ceiling, which makes the allocation decision harder, not easier: with a small pool, you cannot fund everyone, so the strategy is fundamentally about prioritization and disclosure hygiene.


The room rule for this session is simple: no logged offer sheet, budget line, or donor stage means no new public NIL commitment until the collective president signs off. Undocumented promises are how mid-major programs end up with compliance gaps that surface after a public announcement, or donors who heard three different versions of the same deal.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 2](/assets/qa/st97-b2.jpg)


## Standing up the collective and revenue-share stack

```mermaid
flowchart LR
  C["2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Aus"]
  C --> H0["Standing up the collective and revenue"]
  C --> H1["Running the 60-minute working session"]
  C --> H2["Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure "]
  C --> H3["Measuring whether the NIL motion is wo"]

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 3](/assets/qa/st97-b3.jpg)

```


The 2027 stack for a program this size has three layers that must reconcile to a single roster plan. Layer one is the institutional revenue-sharing pool governed by the House settlement — direct payments the athletic department budgets and administers under Deloitte's clearinghouse (NIL Go) review for any third-party deal above the reporting threshold. Layer two is the collective, a separate donor-funded entity that supplements the cap with genuine endorsement and appearance work. Layer three is genuine market NIL — local businesses, autograph sessions, camps, and social promotion where the athlete delivers real commercial value.


The tooling should be boring and auditable. Compliance and disclosure platforms like **Opendorse**, **INFLCR** (Teamworks), and **Basepath** are the established vendors athletes and departments use to log deals, route payments, and file the disclosures state law and the clearinghouse require. On3's NIL valuation data gives a public sanity check on what an athlete's market might reasonably be. The point of naming the system in the training is so no staffer can say "I wasn't sure where to record it" — every offer maps to a field, a stage, and a dollar figure.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 4](/assets/qa/st97-b4.jpg)


A realistic funding model for an FCS-level football roster spreads a modest six-figure-to-low-seven-figure collective pool unevenly: a handful of difference-making transfers or retained starters carry meaningful deals, a middle band gets modest appearance-based agreements, and the remainder participate in team-wide or camp-based opportunities. Trying to pay everyone equally is how a small collective runs dry by October. The trade-off every staffer must internalize is that a dollar promised to retain a proven quarterback is a dollar unavailable for portal insurance in the spring — and both decisions have to be visible on the same sheet.


## Running the 60-minute working session

This is a working session, not a lecture. The manager — here the collective GM or the deputy AD who owns NIL — facilitates, and every attendee arrives with one real athlete or donor target where the 2027 strategy is either the blocker or the unlock. The hour breaks into blocks that sum to exactly sixty minutes and end with a written commitment.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 5](/assets/qa/st97-b5.jpg)


**Frame (0:00–0:08, 8 minutes).** Connect budget credibility to inspectable records. The GM opens with one real case where the program skipped this discipline and paid for it — a recruit lost to a rival collective because the counter-offer was never formalized, or a disclosure filed late. Each attendee opens their tracking platform and creates a record titled with the athlete name and today's date before the timer ends.


**Teach the layers (0:08–0:20, 12 minutes).** Walk the four things every record must carry: the athlete's tier and roster need, the funding source (rev-share vs. collective vs. market deal), the compliance and disclosure status, and the next dated action. Ban adjectives — only names, dollar figures, and dates. If a staffer cannot cite where a number came from, the row is flagged as a due-diligence gap.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 6](/assets/qa/st97-b6.jpg)



**Solo build (0:20–0:35, 15 minutes).** Silent completion of the worksheet on one live target. No side conversations, no Slack. This is where the real thinking happens.

**Pair pressure-test (0:35–0:48, 13 minutes).** One person plays the skeptical donor or the compliance officer; the other defends the deal with documented evidence only. Vague claims get challenged in the room, not after a check is written.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 7](/assets/qa/st97-b7.jpg)



**The rational no (0:48–0:56, 8 minutes).** When to walk, when to hold budget in reserve, and when to downgrade a target. A small collective's discipline is defined by the offers it declines, not the ones it makes.

**Commit (0:56–1:00, 4 minutes).** Round-robin: athlete, one-sentence plan, next action date, funded yes/no. Any commitment without tonight's record gets discussed first in the Monday review and is not treated as funded until documented. Total: 8 + 12 + 15 + 13 + 8 + 4 = 60 minutes.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 8](/assets/qa/st97-b8.jpg)



## Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure discipline

Tiering is the strategy's backbone because it converts a scarce pool into defensible decisions. A workable four-tier model for 2027: **Tier 1** — proven, difference-making returners and marquee transfers who move win totals; these carry the largest deals and the tightest retention plans. **Tier 2** — reliable starters and high-upside developmental players worth a real but modest agreement. **Tier 3** — depth and special-teams contributors participating in team-wide or appearance-based opportunities. **Tier 4** — walk-ons and freshmen on market NIL only (camps, local promotion) until they earn a roster role.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 9](/assets/qa/st97-b9.jpg)


Each tier has a target dollar band and a disclosure expectation. The disclosure discipline is non-negotiable in 2027: under the House framework, third-party deals above the reporting threshold route through the Deloitte-run clearinghouse for a fair-market-value check, and Tennessee's state NIL statute plus school policy govern what must be filed and when. A deal that clears the money but skips the paperwork is a liability, not a win. The worksheet forces the athlete's disclosure status into the same row as the dollar figure so the two never drift apart.


The most common mid-major mistake is treating NIL as a single recruiting-weekend splash instead of a retention program. The transfer portal makes retention the highest-ROI spend: keeping a developed junior is cheaper and lower-risk than buying an unproven transfer to replace one who left because the collective never made a proactive offer. Build the calendar around portal windows — knowing the exact open dates for 2027 and having funded retention offers documented before they open is the entire game.

![2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training — figure 10](/assets/qa/st97-b10.jpg)



## Measuring whether the NIL motion is working

You cannot manage a scarce pool on vibes. Track a small, honest set of metrics weekly in a shared dashboard the AD, the GM, and compliance all see. First, **budget-to-plan**: committed dollars versus the roster plan, by tier, so overspend in one position group is visible before it starves another. Second, **retention rate through portal windows**: the share of targeted returners who stayed, which is the clearest signal that proactive offers beat reactive panic. Third, **disclosure completeness**: the percentage of active deals with filed, current paperwork — anything under 100% is a compliance risk sitting in the open. Fourth, **donor fulfillment**: pledged versus collected collective dollars, because a promise on a spreadsheet is not money in an athlete's account.

The review cadence should be weekly during active recruiting and retention periods and can relax to bi-weekly in the offseason. The failure mode to guard against is letting the review become a status meeting where people narrate updates instead of inspecting records. Anchor it to the dashboard: open the four metrics, drill into any red number, assign a dated owner, and end. When the collective GM can open the tracking platform on any night and see a current record on every committed athlete, the program has a real go-to-market motion instead of a rumor mill.

## Related questions

### How much can Austin Peay realistically spend on NIL in 2027?

Far less than a Power Four school. Between a modest donor collective and a fraction of the House revenue-share cap, an FCS-level program budgets in the low six-to-seven figures across all sports and concentrates most of football's share on a small group of difference-makers rather than spreading it thin.

### Does the House settlement replace collectives?

No. The settlement adds a direct institutional revenue-sharing channel but does not eliminate collectives. For a mid-major, the collective still funds genuine endorsement and appearance work that supplements the capped direct payments, and the two channels must reconcile to one roster plan.

### What is the NIL clearinghouse and does it apply here?

The Deloitte-operated NIL Go clearinghouse reviews third-party deals above a reporting threshold for fair-market-value legitimacy under the House framework. It applies to Austin Peay's athletes' outside deals, which is why disclosure status belongs on every offer record from the start.

### Who should own NIL strategy inside the athletic department?

A named owner — typically a deputy AD or the collective GM — with the AD reviewing weekly. Diffuse ownership across coaches and boosters is how offers go undocumented. One accountable person controls the pipeline, the budget, and the disclosure discipline.

## FAQ

**How long should this training run?** Sixty minutes is the working-session default. A quarterly planning kickoff can extend to ninety minutes with longer scenario work, but never compress below sixty — the pair pressure-test block, where deal quality actually improves, is the part that gets cut first and matters most.

**Should the AD or the collective GM facilitate?** The GM facilitates because they own the pipeline day to day; the AD participates and provides the budget authority and final sign-off. Coaches attend as stakeholders but do not run the room, since the goal is documentation discipline, not recruiting pitches.

**What tools should we standardize on?** Use an established disclosure and payment platform such as Opendorse, INFLCR/Teamworks, or Basepath so every deal is logged and routable for compliance, and use public NIL valuation data as a market sanity check. The specific vendor matters less than picking one and using it for every deal.

**How does this fit with compliance and state law?** It sits on top of them. Tennessee's NIL statute, school policy, and the House clearinghouse define what must be disclosed; this session's job is to make sure the disclosure status is captured on the same record as the money so nothing ships without paperwork.

**What is the biggest mistake mid-major programs make?** Treating NIL as a one-time recruiting splash instead of a retention program. The transfer portal makes keeping developed players the highest-return spend, so a documented, proactive retention offer before a portal window beats a reactive bidding war every time.

**How do we know it is working?** Track four things weekly: committed budget versus roster plan by tier, retention rate through portal windows, disclosure completeness, and donor pledge-to-collection. If retention holds and disclosures stay current while spend stays inside the plan, the motion is working.

## Sources

- https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2021/6/28/media-center-ncaa-adopts-interim-name-image-and-likeness-policy.aspx
- https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45373076/house-settlement-explained-ncaa-revenue-sharing
- https://www.sportico.com/law/analysis/2025/house-settlement-approved-nil-revenue-sharing/
- https://www.on3.com/nil/
- https://opendorse.com/blog/nil-deals-explained/
- https://businessofcollegesports.com/name-image-likeness-legislation-tracker/
- https://www.letsgopeay.com/
- https://www.si.com/college/nil

## Related on PULSE

- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Texas A&m-commerce D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st117)
- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Tennessee Tech D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st116)
- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Southeastern Louisiana D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st115)
- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR South Dakota D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st113)
- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Rhode Island D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st111)
- [2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Northern Colorado D1 College — 60-Min Training](/knowledge/st109)

Was this helpful?

Sources cited

Pulse RevOps sales training methodologyPulse RevOps sales training methodology

Kory White

2027 NIL Go-to-market Strategy FOR Austin Peay D1 College — 60-Min Training

Why a mid-major program needs a written NIL playbook

Standing up the collective and revenue-share stack

Running the 60-minute working session

Athlete tiers, offers, and disclosure discipline

Measuring whether the NIL motion is working

Related questions

How much can Austin Peay realistically spend on NIL in 2027?

Does the House settlement replace collectives?

What is the NIL clearinghouse and does it apply here?

Who should own NIL strategy inside the athletic department?

FAQ

Sources

Related on PULSE

Two scores — Gate vs IQ