13/13 Gate✓ IQ Certified10/10?

How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes?

📖 2,234 words🗓️ Published Jun 23, 2026

Direct Answer

A cost segregation study reclassifies pieces of your buildout out of the slow 39-year commercial depreciation bucket and into 5-, 7-, and 15-year buckets that depreciate fast. On a typical buildout, studies move 20% to 40% of the project's depreciable basis into those short-life classes. The money move: combine that reclassification with bonus depreciation, and you can write off a big chunk of your buildout in year one instead of bleeding it out over four decades.

Run the math. On a $1,000,000 owned-building improvement, a study might reclassify $300,000 into 5- and 15-year property. With 2026 bonus depreciation at 40% (it phases down: 100% through 2022, 80% in 2023, 60% in 2024, 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026 under the original schedule — confirm the current-year rate with your CPA, since Congress has repeatedly restored 100%), you accelerate roughly $120,000 to $300,000 of deductions into the first year. At a 37% federal marginal rate plus state, that first-year deduction is worth $45,000 to $110,000 in cash you keep instead of sending to the IRS.

The real value is the time value of money. A deduction taken today is worth more than the same deduction spread over 39 years. At an 8% discount rate, accelerating $300,000 of depreciation from a 39-year drip into year one creates a net present value (NPV) benefit of $40,000 to $70,000 per $1M of basis — pure financing-cost savings, not a permanent tax cut. You're borrowing from your future self at the IRS's expense, interest-free.

Studies cost $5,000 to $15,000 for a buildout under $2M, and $15,000 to $50,000 for larger projects. The rule of thumb: if your study costs $10,000 and frees up $60,000 in NPV, that's a 6:1 return. Below roughly $500,000 of improvements the math gets thin — but above $750,000 it's usually a clear win.

What a Cost Segregation Study Actually Reclassifies

A buildout looks like one number on your closing statement, but the IRS sees dozens of components with different useful lives. A qualified study — usually run by an engineering-based firm — walks the property and assigns each component to its proper class.

5-year property (MACRS): Carpet, decorative lighting, dedicated electrical for equipment, data cabling, removable partitions, accent millwork, breakroom appliances, signage.
7-year property: Certain office furnishings and fixtures tied to your business operation.
15-year property (land improvements): Parking lots, sidewalks, landscaping, exterior lighting, fencing, site drainage.
39-year property: The building shell, structural walls, roof, HVAC serving the whole building, plumbing — the stuff that stays.

The leverage is in that first bucket. On a restaurant buildout, 30% to 45% of cost commonly lands in 5- and 15-year classes because of the heavy electrical, decorative, and kitchen-adjacent components. On a generic office, expect 15% to 25%. A medical or dental buildout — heavy on dedicated power, plumbing, and specialty fixtures — often hits 25% to 35%.

How Bonus Depreciation Supercharges the Study

Cost segregation by itself just speeds up the schedule — instead of 39 years, a reclassified item depreciates over 5 or 15. Bonus depreciation is the multiplier. It lets you deduct a percentage of any asset with a recovery period of 20 years or less in the year it's placed in service. That covers everything a cost seg study pulls into the 5-, 7-, and 15-year buckets.

So the workflow is: study reclassifies → reclassified assets qualify for bonus → you deduct the bonus percentage immediately. Without the study, those assets sit in the 39-year shell and never qualify for bonus at all. The study is what unlocks eligibility.

A second lever is Section 179 expensing, which in 2026 allows up to roughly $1.25 million of qualifying property to be expensed (with a phase-out beginning around $3.13 million of total purchases — confirm current indexed figures). Section 179 can cover roof, HVAC, fire protection, and security systems on non-residential property, which bonus depreciation historically could not reach because those are 39-year items. Stack 179 on the long-life systems and bonus on the cost-seg'd short-life assets, and you maximize the year-one write-off.

When Cost Segregation Makes Sense — and When It Doesn't

It makes sense when: you own the building or made a substantial improvement, basis is above $500,000, you have taxable income to absorb the deduction, and you'll hold the property at least a few years. It makes less sense when: you're a short-term tenant (look at QIP rules instead), you have net operating losses that already wipe out your tax, or you plan to sell within a year or two and don't want to manage the depreciation recapture.

Recapture is the catch. When you sell, the accelerated depreciation gets recaptured — 5- and 7-year personal property is taxed as ordinary income (Section 1245), and the 15-year land improvements face Section 1250 recapture. You don't lose the time-value benefit you already banked, but plan for it. Many owners pair a cost seg with a future 1031 exchange to defer that recapture indefinitely.

Look-Back Studies: Catching Up Without Amending

If you finished a buildout one, three, or even ten years ago and never did a study, you're not out of luck. A look-back cost segregation study lets you capture all the depreciation you should have taken — without amending prior returns.

You file IRS Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, and take a Section 481(a) adjustment in the current year. That adjustment is a single catch-up deduction equal to the difference between the depreciation you took and what you should have taken. For an owner who placed a $2M buildout in service five years ago and never segregated, a look-back can produce a six-figure catch-up deduction in the current year. No amended returns, no penalty.

How the Numbers Flow

The headline number to remember: every $100,000 you move from 39-year to year-one deduction is worth roughly $13,000 to $25,000 in NPV at an 8% discount rate, depending on your bracket. That's the financing benefit, and it's why owners with real basis almost always run the study.

flowchart TD A[Buildout or building purchase] --> B{Owned or substantial improvement?} B -- No, short-term lease only --> C["QIP / leasehold rules instead"] B -- Yes --> D{Depreciable basis above $500K?} D -- No --> E[Study cost may exceed benefit] D -- Yes --> F{Profitable now or soon?} F -- No, losses for years --> G[Defer study or carry forward] F -- Yes --> H[Order engineering cost seg study] H --> I["Reclassify 20-40% to 5/7/15-yr"] I --> J[Apply bonus + Section 179] J --> K[Year-one deduction + NPV gain]

flowchart LR A[$1M depreciable basis] --> B["Study: $300K to 5/15-yr"] A --> C[$700K stays 39-yr] B --> D[Bonus + 179 applied] D --> E[$120K-$300K year-1 deduction] E --> F["x 37% fed + state"] F --> G[$45K-$110K cash kept] G --> H["NPV gain $40K-$70K at 8%"]

Related on PULSE

[How Do I Value-Engineer a Buildout to Cut 20% off the Cost?](/knowledge/q13684)
[What vendor consolidation strategies are GTM teams using to cut tech stacks by 40% in 2027?](/knowledge/q16473)
[How Do I Sublease My Space to Cut My Rent?](/knowledge/q13673)
[How Do I Depreciate Leasehold Improvements (QIP) to Save on Taxes?](/knowledge/q13793)
[How Do I Avoid Double-Paying Property Taxes in an NNN Lease?](/knowledge/q13660)
[How do MLB and NBA luxury taxes work and what can RevOps learn from them in 2027?](/knowledge/q12998)

How Bonus Depreciation Supercharges the Benefit

The real kicker in a cost segregation study is how it pairs with bonus depreciation. Under current tax law (as of 2024–2025), bonus depreciation allows you to immediately deduct 60% to 80% of the cost of newly placed 5-, 7-, and 15-year property in the first year. On a $1,000,000 buildout where $300,000 gets reclassified into short-life assets, that means $180,000 to $240,000 could be written off in year one alone—instead of spreading that same amount over 39 years at roughly $7,700 per year. The remaining short-life balance then depreciates normally over its class life, still far faster than 39-year property. This front-loaded deduction can slash your taxable income dramatically in the year your buildout is placed in service.

When a Cost Segregation Study Makes the Most Sense

Not every buildout is a slam dunk for a cost segregation study. The sweet spot typically falls on projects with a total depreciable basis of $500,000 or more, though smaller builds can still benefit if the study costs ($3,000–$8,000, depending on complexity) are outweighed by the tax savings. Studies are especially powerful for tenant improvements—like interior walls, electrical, plumbing, and flooring—where 20% to 40% of costs often qualify as 5- or 7-year personal property. If you're doing a ground-up buildout or a major renovation with lots of specialized equipment (e.g., restaurant kitchens, lab fit-outs, or medical offices), the percentage reclassified can push toward the higher end. The key is to run a quick cost-benefit before commissioning the study.

The Timing Trap: Why You Need to Act Fast

A cost segregation study must be completed no later than the tax return due date (including extensions) for the year the buildout is placed in service. Miss that window, and you lose the chance to claim bonus depreciation on the reclassified assets for that year—you'd have to file a Form 3115 to catch up, which adds complexity. For a buildout completed in December 2024, you'd need the study done by October 15, 2025 (with an extension). Many owners wait until after the buildout is finished, but the best approach is to commission the study during construction when engineers can walk the site and document costs in real time. This avoids costly retroactive analysis and ensures you capture every eligible dollar.

FAQ

Does a cost segregation study work for any type of commercial buildout? Yes, it applies to most commercial tenant improvements, including office, retail, medical, and industrial spaces. The key is that the buildout includes assets like lighting, flooring, cabinetry, or specialized electrical work that can be reclassified. Even smaller buildouts can benefit, though the savings scale with project size.

Will a cost segregation study trigger an IRS audit? No, these studies are a standard, IRS-accepted tax strategy when performed by a qualified engineering-based firm. The IRS has issued clear guidelines (like Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide) that support proper reclassification. As long as the study is thorough and defensible, it is a routine tax planning tool.

How much can I actually save on my buildout taxes? Typical savings range from roughly 5% to 15% of the total buildout cost in net present value over the first few years. For a $500,000 buildout, that could mean $25,000 to $75,000 in accelerated depreciation benefits. Exact numbers depend on your tax bracket, the mix of assets, and local tax laws.

Do I need to do the study before construction starts? It is best to start the study during the planning or early construction phase, but it can also be done after completion. A retroactive study can still reclassify assets for the current and prior tax years. However, doing it early ensures the engineer can document assets as they are installed.

How long does a cost segregation study take, and what does it cost? A typical study takes 2 to 4 weeks from site visit to final report, though complex projects may take longer. Costs generally range from $2,000 to $10,000 for a standard commercial buildout, but the tax savings usually far outweigh the fee. Many firms offer a free feasibility estimate first.

Can I claim bonus depreciation on reclassified assets from a cost segregation study? Yes, bonus depreciation often applies to the shorter-life assets (5- and 7-year property) identified in the study. Under current law, you may be able to deduct a significant percentage of those costs in the first year. However, bonus depreciation percentages can change with tax law updates, so check with your tax advisor.

Sources

IRS, "Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide" (irs.gov)
IRS Publication 946, "How to Depreciate Property" (MACRS recovery periods)
IRS, Section 168(k) bonus depreciation rules and phase-down schedule
IRS, Section 179 expensing limits and Form 3115 instructions (Section 481(a))
RSMeans construction cost data (component cost allocation benchmarks)
CBRE, "U.S. Tenant Improvement Cost Guide" (buildout cost benchmarks)
BDO / RSM CRE tax advisory, cost segregation NPV modeling guidance

Download:

![How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes?](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/c69aed_377e2f8ffdcf4254a64b3d08c5fa668e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1000,h_667,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/c69aed_377e2f8ffdcf4254a64b3d08c5fa668e~mv2.png)

<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1200 340" role="img" aria-label="How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes? — PULSE Buildouts"><rect width="1200" height="340" fill="#EBE9DE"/><rect width="14" height="340" fill="#C0531F"/><text x="58" y="116" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="32" font-weight="800" letter-spacing="3" fill="#C0531F">PULSE BUILDOUTS · COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE</text><text x="56" y="198" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="60" font-weight="800" fill="#2b2b2b">Save money. Don’t get screwed.</text><text x="58" y="258" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="30" font-weight="600" fill="#6b5b4d">Leases, TI, NNN &amp; buildouts — negotiated in your favor</text><g transform="translate(1010,86)" fill="none" stroke="#C0531F" stroke-width="9" stroke-linejoin="round"><rect x="20" y="40" width="150" height="130"/><line x1="20" y1="40" x2="95" y2="6"/><line x1="170" y1="40" x2="95" y2="6"/><rect x="50" y="80" width="36" height="36"/><rect x="104" y="80" width="36" height="36"/><rect x="74" y="128" width="42" height="42"/></g></svg>

# How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes?

## Direct Answer

A **cost segregation study** reclassifies pieces of your buildout out of the slow **39-year** commercial depreciation bucket and into **5-, 7-, and 15-year** buckets that depreciate fast. On a typical buildout, studies move **20% to 40%** of the project's depreciable basis into those short-life classes. The money move: combine that reclassification with **bonus depreciation**, and you can write off a big chunk of your buildout in **year one** instead of bleeding it out over four decades.

Run the math. On a **$1,000,000** owned-building improvement, a study might reclassify **$300,000** into 5- and 15-year property. With **2026 bonus depreciation at 40%** (it phases down: 100% through 2022, 80% in 2023, 60% in 2024, 40% in 2025, **20% in 2026** under the original schedule — confirm the current-year rate with your CPA, since Congress has repeatedly restored 100%), you accelerate roughly **$120,000 to $300,000** of deductions into the first year. At a **37%** federal marginal rate plus state, that first-year deduction is worth **$45,000 to $110,000** in cash you keep instead of sending to the IRS.

The real value is the **time value of money**. A deduction taken today is worth more than the same deduction spread over 39 years. At an **8% discount rate**, accelerating **$300,000** of depreciation from a 39-year drip into year one creates a **net present value (NPV) benefit of $40,000 to $70,000** per $1M of basis — pure financing-cost savings, not a permanent tax cut. You're borrowing from your future self at the IRS's expense, interest-free.

Studies cost **$5,000 to $15,000** for a buildout under $2M, and **$15,000 to $50,000** for larger projects. The rule of thumb: if your study costs **$10,000** and frees up **$60,000** in NPV, that's a **6:1 return**. Below roughly **$500,000** of improvements the math gets thin — but above $750,000 it's usually a clear win.

## What a Cost Segregation Study Actually Reclassifies

![How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes? — What a Cost Segregation Study Actually Reclassifies](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20What%20a%20Cost%20Segregation%20Study%20Actually%20Reclassifies%20How%20Does%20a%20Cost%20Segregation%20%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=22565)


A buildout looks like one number on your closing statement, but the IRS sees dozens of components with different useful lives. A qualified study — usually run by an engineering-based firm — walks the property and assigns each component to its proper class.

- **5-year property (MACRS):** Carpet, decorative lighting, dedicated electrical for equipment, data cabling, removable partitions, accent millwork, breakroom appliances, signage.
- **7-year property:** Certain office furnishings and fixtures tied to your business operation.
- **15-year property (land improvements):** Parking lots, sidewalks, landscaping, exterior lighting, fencing, site drainage.
- **39-year property:** The building shell, structural walls, roof, HVAC serving the whole building, plumbing — the stuff that stays.

The leverage is in that first bucket. On a restaurant buildout, **30% to 45%** of cost commonly lands in 5- and 15-year classes because of the heavy electrical, decorative, and kitchen-adjacent components. On a generic office, expect **15% to 25%**. A medical or dental buildout — heavy on dedicated power, plumbing, and specialty fixtures — often hits **25% to 35%**.

## How Bonus Depreciation Supercharges the Study

![How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes? — How Bonus Depreciation Supercharges the Study](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20How%20Bonus%20Depreciation%20Supercharges%20the%20Study%20How%20Does%20a%20Cost%20Segregation%20Study%20%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=73828)


**Cost segregation by itself** just speeds up the schedule — instead of 39 years, a reclassified item depreciates over 5 or 15. **Bonus depreciation** is the multiplier. It lets you deduct a percentage of any asset with a recovery period of **20 years or less** in the year it's placed in service. That covers everything a cost seg study pulls into the 5-, 7-, and 15-year buckets.

So the workflow is: **study reclassifies** → reclassified assets qualify for bonus → you deduct the bonus percentage immediately. Without the study, those assets sit in the 39-year shell and never qualify for bonus at all. The study is what unlocks eligibility.

A second lever is **Section 179 expensing**, which in **2026 allows up to roughly $1.25 million** of qualifying property to be expensed (with a phase-out beginning around **$3.13 million** of total purchases — confirm current indexed figures). Section 179 can cover **roof, HVAC, fire protection, and security systems** on non-residential property, which bonus depreciation historically could not reach because those are 39-year items. Stack 179 on the long-life systems and bonus on the cost-seg'd short-life assets, and you maximize the year-one write-off.

## When Cost Segregation Makes Sense — and When It Doesn't

![How Does a Cost Segregation Study Cut My Buildout Taxes? — When Cost Segregation Makes Sense — and When It Doesn't](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20When%20Cost%20Segregation%20Makes%20Sense%20%E2%80%94%20and%20When%20It%20Doesn't%20How%20Does%20a%20Cost%20Segregat%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=71518)


```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Buildout or building purchase] --> B{Owned or substantial improvement?}
    B -- No, short-term lease only --> C[QIP / leasehold rules instead]
    B -- Yes --> D{Depreciable basis above $500K?}
    D -- No --> E[Study cost may exceed benefit]
    D -- Yes --> F{Profitable now or soon?}
    F -- No, losses for years --> G[Defer study or carry forward]
    F -- Yes --> H[Order engineering cost seg study]
    H --> I[Reclassify 20-40% to 5/7/15-yr]
    I --> J[Apply bonus + Section 179]
    J --> K[Year-one deduction + NPV gain]
```

**It makes sense when:** you own the building or made a substantial improvement, basis is above **$500,000**, you have taxable income to absorb the deduction, and you'll hold the property at least a few years. **It makes less sense when:** you're a short-term tenant (look at QIP rules instead), you have net operating losses that already wipe out your tax, or you plan to sell within a year or two and don't want to manage the depreciation recapture.

**Recapture is the catch.** When you sell, the accelerated depreciation gets recaptured — 5- and 7-year personal property is taxed as ordinary income (Section 1245), and the 15-year land improvements face Section 1250 recapture. You don't lose the time-value benefit you already banked, but plan for it. Many owners pair a cost seg with a future **1031 exchange** to defer that recapture indefinitely.

## Look-Back Studies: Catching Up Without Amending

If you finished a buildout one, three, or even ten years ago and never did a study, you're not out of luck. A **look-back cost segregation study** lets you capture all the depreciation you should have taken — without amending prior returns.

You file **IRS Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method**, and take a **Section 481(a) adjustment** in the current year. That adjustment is a single catch-up deduction equal to the difference between the depreciation you took and what you should have taken. For an owner who placed a **$2M** buildout in service five years ago and never segregated, a look-back can produce a **six-figure catch-up deduction** in the current year. No amended returns, no penalty.

## How the Numbers Flow

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    A[$1M depreciable basis] --> B[Study: $300K to 5/15-yr]
    A --> C[$700K stays 39-yr]
    B --> D[Bonus + 179 applied]
    D --> E[$120K-$300K year-1 deduction]
    E --> F[x 37% fed + state]
    F --> G[$45K-$110K cash kept]
    G --> H[NPV gain $40K-$70K at 8%]
```

The headline number to remember: every **$100,000** you move from 39-year to year-one deduction is worth roughly **$13,000 to $25,000** in NPV at an 8% discount rate, depending on your bracket. That's the financing benefit, and it's why owners with real basis almost always run the study.

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [How Do I Value-Engineer a Buildout to Cut 20% off the Cost?](/knowledge/q13684)
- [What vendor consolidation strategies are GTM teams using to cut tech stacks by 40% in 2027?](/knowledge/q16473)
- [How Do I Sublease My Space to Cut My Rent?](/knowledge/q13673)
- [How Do I Depreciate Leasehold Improvements (QIP) to Save on Taxes?](/knowledge/q13793)
- [How Do I Avoid Double-Paying Property Taxes in an NNN Lease?](/knowledge/q13660)
- [How do MLB and NBA luxury taxes work and what can RevOps learn from them in 2027?](/knowledge/q12998)

## How Bonus Depreciation Supercharges the Benefit

The real kicker in a cost segregation study is how it pairs with **bonus depreciation**. Under current tax law (as of 2024–2025), bonus depreciation allows you to immediately deduct **60% to 80%** of the cost of newly placed 5-, 7-, and 15-year property in the first year. On a $1,000,000 buildout where $300,000 gets reclassified into short-life assets, that means **$180,000 to $240,000** could be written off in year one alone—instead of spreading that same amount over 39 years at roughly $7,700 per year. The remaining short-life balance then depreciates normally over its class life, still far faster than 39-year property. This front-loaded deduction can slash your taxable income dramatically in the year your buildout is placed in service.

## When a Cost Segregation Study Makes the Most Sense

Not every buildout is a slam dunk for a cost segregation study. The sweet spot typically falls on projects with a **total depreciable basis of $500,000 or more**, though smaller builds can still benefit if the study costs ($3,000–$8,000, depending on complexity) are outweighed by the tax savings. Studies are especially powerful for **tenant improvements**—like interior walls, electrical, plumbing, and flooring—where 20% to 40% of costs often qualify as 5- or 7-year personal property. If you're doing a ground-up buildout or a major renovation with lots of specialized equipment (e.g., restaurant kitchens, lab fit-outs, or medical offices), the percentage reclassified can push toward the higher end. The key is to run a quick cost-benefit before commissioning the study.

## The Timing Trap: Why You Need to Act Fast

A cost segregation study must be completed **no later than the tax return due date** (including extensions) for the year the buildout is placed in service. Miss that window, and you lose the chance to claim bonus depreciation on the reclassified assets for that year—you'd have to file a Form 3115 to catch up, which adds complexity. For a buildout completed in December 2024, you'd need the study done by October 15, 2025 (with an extension). Many owners wait until after the buildout is finished, but the best approach is to **commission the study during construction** when engineers can walk the site and document costs in real time. This avoids costly retroactive analysis and ensures you capture every eligible dollar.

## FAQ

**Does a cost segregation study work for any type of commercial buildout?**  
Yes, it applies to most commercial tenant improvements, including office, retail, medical, and industrial spaces. The key is that the buildout includes assets like lighting, flooring, cabinetry, or specialized electrical work that can be reclassified. Even smaller buildouts can benefit, though the savings scale with project size.

**Will a cost segregation study trigger an IRS audit?**  
No, these studies are a standard, IRS-accepted tax strategy when performed by a qualified engineering-based firm. The IRS has issued clear guidelines (like Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide) that support proper reclassification. As long as the study is thorough and defensible, it is a routine tax planning tool.

**How much can I actually save on my buildout taxes?**  
Typical savings range from roughly 5% to 15% of the total buildout cost in net present value over the first few years. For a $500,000 buildout, that could mean $25,000 to $75,000 in accelerated depreciation benefits. Exact numbers depend on your tax bracket, the mix of assets, and local tax laws.

**Do I need to do the study before construction starts?**  
It is best to start the study during the planning or early construction phase, but it can also be done after completion. A retroactive study can still reclassify assets for the current and prior tax years. However, doing it early ensures the engineer can document assets as they are installed.

**How long does a cost segregation study take, and what does it cost?**  
A typical study takes 2 to 4 weeks from site visit to final report, though complex projects may take longer. Costs generally range from $2,000 to $10,000 for a standard commercial buildout, but the tax savings usually far outweigh the fee. Many firms offer a free feasibility estimate first.

**Can I claim bonus depreciation on reclassified assets from a cost segregation study?**  
Yes, bonus depreciation often applies to the shorter-life assets (5- and 7-year property) identified in the study. Under current law, you may be able to deduct a significant percentage of those costs in the first year. However, bonus depreciation percentages can change with tax law updates, so check with your tax advisor.

## Sources

- IRS, "Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide" (irs.gov)
- IRS Publication 946, "How to Depreciate Property" (MACRS recovery periods)
- IRS, Section 168(k) bonus depreciation rules and phase-down schedule
- IRS, Section 179 expensing limits and Form 3115 instructions (Section 481(a))
- RSMeans construction cost data (component cost allocation benchmarks)
- CBRE, "U.S. Tenant Improvement Cost Guide" (buildout cost benchmarks)
- BDO / RSM CRE tax advisory, cost segregation NPV modeling guidance

Was this helpful?

Kory White