Should I open or buy a LongHorn Steakhouse franchise in 2027?
PULSEKNOWLEDGE LIBRARYQuality
Certified

You almost certainly cannot. LongHorn Steakhouse is not franchised domestically — Darden owns and operates every US restaurant, and no resales exist. The only openings are Darden's international licensing and US airport programs, both requiring roughly $5M net worth, multi-unit full-service operating history, and a $2.0M–$3.5M build per unit.
What "buying a LongHorn" actually means in practice
Most people arrive at this question after seeing a LongHorn packed on a Friday night and assuming there is a franchise document somewhere with a price on it. There is not — at least not the kind of document a prospective single-unit owner is imagining. Darden Restaurants operates LongHorn as a company-owned brand. Every domestic street-side restaurant is a Darden restaurant, staffed by Darden employees, on a lease Darden signed, running Darden's supply chain. There is no Franchise Disclosure Document registered with state franchise regulators for domestic LongHorn units, because Darden does not sell domestic units. That absence is not an oversight or a temporary pause; it is the corporate strategy. Darden's entire investment thesis with analysts rests on owning its restaurant-level margin rather than collecting a royalty on it.
This creates a specific and frustrating information problem. Search "LongHorn Steakhouse franchise cost" and you will find directory sites publishing investment ranges, royalty percentages, and net-worth requirements as if you could act on them tomorrow. Those numbers are not fabricated — they are pulled from Darden's international and airport licensing program, which is real. The distortion is contextual: those figures describe a program that accepts a handful of applicants globally per year, almost none of whom are first-time US operators. A directory page listing "$2.0M–$3.5M total investment" next to a "Request Information" button implies a transaction that is available to the person reading it. It is not.
So there are exactly two live options, and a third that most readers will actually end up taking:

Option A — Darden International Franchising. Darden licenses LongHorn to operators outside the United States under a development agreement covering a defined territory. Existing international LongHorn presence includes Puerto Rico, Guam, Ecuador, and Mexico. These are not single-restaurant deals. Darden signs country or region development agreements with a schedule — a commitment to open a specified number of restaurants over a specified number of years. You bring the territory thesis, the real estate, the construction capability, and a beef supply chain that can deliver USDA-grade product at scale into that market.
Option B — US airport licensing. Darden licenses LongHorn into airport terminals. Existing airport units include Atlanta (ATL) and Detroit (DTW), operated by HMSHost. This is where most people's mental model breaks: you do not apply to Darden for an airport LongHorn the way you would apply to a franchisor for a suburban pad site. Airport food and beverage is controlled by a small set of master concessionaires — HMSHost (Autogrill), SSP America, Paradies Lagardère, and Areas — who bid multi-brand packages when an airport authority issues a concession RFP. LongHorn is one brand slot inside a package those companies assemble. Your realistic path is a relationship with one of them, typically as a local or ACDBE partner on a package they are bidding, not a direct license from Darden.

Option C — the one you probably take. Buy or build a comparable steakhouse asset with an actual open door. Outback Steakhouse still franchises domestically under Bloomin' Brands. Texas Roadhouse has been closed to new franchisees for years and instead buys back existing franchisee units, which means the only way in is acquiring an existing franchisee group at market EBITDA multiples. An independent steakhouse build carries no royalty at all and no franchisor approval process. For anyone reading this with under $2M in liquidity and without a multi-unit resume, Option C is the honest answer to the question.
The comparison that matters is not "LongHorn versus Outback." It is "a brand I cannot access versus assets I can." Spending six months chasing Option A when your financial statement disqualifies you at the first screen is the most expensive mistake in this whole analysis, because the cost is not money — it is a year of not building the thing you could have built.
How to decide which lane you are actually in
Decision-making here is unusually clean, because the gates are hard rather than judgment calls. You either clear the financial screen or you do not. You either have multi-unit full-service operating history or you do not. You either have a relationship with an airport master concessionaire or you do not. There is no version of this where charm, a good deck, or a strong local market thesis substitutes for the balance sheet.

Work the gates in this order:
Gate one — liquidity and net worth. Darden's stated expectation for international franchise partners sits in the range of $5M net worth with substantial liquid capital behind it. Note what this figure is doing: it is not the cost of one restaurant. It is a screen for whether you can capitalize a multi-unit development schedule without a financing failure two units in. If your personal financial statement, signed by a CPA, does not clear that bar, you are done with Options A and B. Do not spend a dollar or a week trying to work around it.
Gate two — operating resume. Darden is not looking for an investor. It is looking for an operator who already runs full-service restaurants at scale and can prove it. A résumé showing ten or more full-service units under management — ideally with a recognizable US casual-dining brand — is the practical threshold. Quick-service experience does not substitute. A steakhouse runs a scratch kitchen with expensive protein inventory, a bar program, and a service model where labor is 30%+ of sales. Franchisors reading applications know exactly how differently that operates from a drive-thru.

Gate three — territory or terminal. For Option A, you need a specific market with named sites, a demographic and competitive analysis, and a construction plan. Darden will not source real estate for you overseas. For Option B, you need a named concessionaire relationship and awareness of which concourse RFPs are actually coming. Airport concession cycles run long — from RFP issuance to opening day is commonly three to five years — so "I would like an airport LongHorn" without a live RFP and a master partner is not a plan, it is a wish.
Gate four — engagement. Darden expects the licensee's principal to be operationally engaged. This is not an absentee-ownership asset. If your model assumes hiring a GM and collecting distributions from another time zone, the brand relationship will not survive the first bad quarter, and Darden's approval process is designed to catch exactly that posture before it signs anything.
The diagram compresses something worth stating plainly: four of the five paths through it end at Option C. That is not pessimism about your prospects — it is an accurate map of a brand that has deliberately kept its domestic system closed. Reading the map correctly saves you the year.

The numbers behind each path
Treat every figure below as a planning range to pressure-test against a real quote, not a quoted price. Construction costs in particular swing hard by market, and airport builds carry premiums that suburban builds do not.
LongHorn international or airport license. Darden discloses a total investment range in the neighborhood of $2.0M to $3.5M per restaurant. Decomposed, that is roughly: an initial license fee in the low six figures, $1.4M–$2.6M in build-out and equipment for a full-service kitchen in a 5,500–6,500 square foot box, and $300K–$500K of working capital to carry the first six months. The Darden licensing royalty is 5–6% of gross sales, with a marketing or brand fund contribution of roughly 2–3% on top — call it 7–9% off the top before you have paid for a single ribeye. That total burden is meaningfully heavier than a Texas Roadhouse franchisee's 4% royalty structure — three to five percentage points heavier — which is the single most important line item to model, because it comes off gross sales regardless of how your P&L is performing.

Why the AUV makes it survivable anyway. LongHorn's corporate restaurants generate average unit volumes among the strongest in casual dining — roughly $5M+ annually per restaurant based on Darden's reported segment sales divided by unit count. That volume is what makes a 7–9% off-the-top burden mathematically tolerable. At $5M in sales, seven points is $350,000 a year. At $2.8M in sales — a more typical casual-dining AUV — that same seven points is a business-ending number against the same fixed build cost. The entire investment case rests on inheriting the volume, not just the sign.
Airport economics specifically. Airport units run higher volumes than street-side because the traffic is captive and pricing is elevated, but they also run brutal cost structures: percentage rent to the airport authority, restricted delivery windows, badging and security costs for every employee, and labor markets where staff must clear background checks and pay to park. The high volume and the high cost structure largely cancel. Model a payback period in the five-to-eight-year range and treat anything faster as a happy surprise rather than the base case.
International economics. Slower ramp, longer approval cycle, and a supply chain problem that street-side US operators never face. Getting consistent USDA-grade beef into a foreign market means import licensing, cold chain, tariff exposure, and currency risk on your largest input cost. Payback in the six-to-nine-year band is a realistic plan. Darden's approval timeline alone commonly runs twelve to twenty-four months before a development agreement is signed, and that clock starts after you have assembled the application package.

Option C by the numbers. Outback Steakhouse remains available to domestic franchisees through Bloomin' Brands at an initial investment broadly comparable to the LongHorn range and a 4% royalty, against a lower AUV — roughly $4M+ per unit. Texas Roadhouse franchisee groups trade privately; restaurant platform acquisitions in that tier typically clear at high-single-digit EBITDA multiples, which means buying cash flow rather than building it, at a price that reflects the certainty. An independent steakhouse build in the $1.2M–$2.5M range carries zero royalty and zero brand fund, and a well-run independent can hold operator margins in the mid-to-high teens — but you are buying your own traffic from a standing start, with no national advertising and no brand recognition to fill the dining room on a Tuesday in month three.
The beef line item that outranks all of the above. Cattle supply has been tight through the current herd cycle, and beef costs have run well above general food inflation. Darden manages this with forward contracting at a scale no single licensee can replicate, and absorbs margin compression rather than pricing through to guests, because its value positioning depends on holding entrée price points. A licensee inherits the brand's price ceiling without inheriting Darden's purchasing leverage. Model your protein cost with a genuine sensitivity analysis — a several-hundred-basis-point swing in beef cost against a fixed menu price is the fastest route from a working unit to a broken one. This is the specific risk that separates "owning a steakhouse" from "owning a restaurant."
Who this actually works for. The profile that clears every gate and makes money is narrow: an established multi-unit full-service operator or an international hospitality group with real estate sourcing capability, import supply chain access, existing experience with a US casual-dining brand, and enough capital to fund a three-to-five unit development schedule from current liquidity rather than from cash flow of the first unit. Private-equity-backed restaurant platforms and family offices deploying across a master license fit this. A first-time operator with $800K does not, and no amount of enthusiasm changes that arithmetic.

Building the application and sequencing the work
If you clear the gates, the work is a document assembly problem followed by a long patience problem. Sequence it deliberately — Darden's development team screens hard on the first pass and a thin packet gets no response at all rather than a rejection letter.
Weeks one and two — confirm eligibility and pick the lane. Get a current personal financial statement prepared and signed by your CPA. If it does not clear the net worth and liquidity screen, stop and execute Option C. If it does, choose international or airport definitively. These are different applications reviewed by different people with different diligence questions, and hedging across both signals that you have thought carefully about neither.
Weeks three and four — assemble the packet. For an international application you need: the CPA-signed financial statement; an operating résumé documenting your existing units, years operating, and brand affiliations; a market analysis for your proposed territory covering population, income distribution, dining density, and named competitors; a real estate sourcing plan with specific sites or at minimum specific corridors and a broker relationship; a supply chain plan addressing how USDA-grade beef reaches your kitchens and at what landed cost; and a proposed development schedule. Darden thinks in multi-unit terms — a proposal to open one restaurant and see how it goes reads as a non-starter.

Weeks five and six — submit through franchisedarden.com. Darden routes international and airport inquiries through its franchising site. Qualified applicants typically hear back within a few weeks; unqualified ones frequently hear nothing. Silence is information. Do not interpret it as a filing error and resubmit — interpret it as the screen working.
Weeks seven and eight — the first conversation. Expect a video meeting with Darden's franchising team in Orlando. They will interrogate your operating history, your balance sheet, and your territory thesis in roughly that order. Bring named sites if you have them. The question that separates serious candidates from tourists is "what does your existing business look like operationally on a Saturday night?" — answer it with specifics about labor models, ticket times, and how you handle a bad shift.

Weeks nine through eleven — diligence. If you advance, expect site visits to your existing restaurants, reference checks with your lenders, landlords, and protein suppliers, and a term sheet covering license fee, royalty, marketing contribution, territory boundaries, development schedule, and term length. Read the development schedule harder than the royalty. The royalty is a known percentage; the development schedule is a contractual obligation to spend eight figures on a timeline that may not survive contact with a construction market.
Week twelve — decide. Sign or walk, honestly. The specific trap: agreeing to a development schedule you can only fund if unit one performs to plan. Beef cost volatility and construction cost inflation both cut against that assumption. If you cannot capitalize the full committed schedule from current liquidity, negotiate the schedule down or walk. A licensee who defaults on a development obligation loses the territory and the fees already paid.
Running the unit once it is open. The operational discipline that decides whether the investment works is unglamorous and mostly about two numbers: protein cost as a percentage of sales, and labor as a percentage of sales during peak dayparts. Steakhouse guests are unusually sensitive to cook temperature accuracy and ticket time, and both are trained behaviors rather than menu decisions. Build a weekly operating rhythm around a small set of measured indicators — waste by cut, cook-temp refire rate, table turn time at peak, and labor hours against forecast — and review them on the same day each week. This is the RevOps instinct applied to a restaurant: instrument the few metrics that actually move contribution margin, put them in front of the operator on a fixed cadence, and act on the variance rather than the anecdote.
Related questions
Can I buy an existing LongHorn location from Darden?
No. Darden operates its domestic LongHorn restaurants as company stores and does not sell them to individual buyers. There is no resale market, no broker listing, and no negotiated exception. Anyone offering to source one for you is selling something that does not exist.
Is Texas Roadhouse a realistic alternative?
Not for new franchisees. Texas Roadhouse has been closed to new franchise awards for years and has been acquiring existing franchisee restaurants rather than granting new ones. The only entry is buying an existing franchisee group privately, at an acquisition multiple that reflects the brand's performance.
What if I only want to invest, not operate?
Darden expects the licensee's principal to be operationally engaged, so passive ownership of a licensed unit is not on the table. A minority equity position in an already-approved international licensee is the closest structure, but it depends entirely on that operator wanting outside capital.
How long does the whole process take?
Plan for twelve to twenty-four months from first contact to a signed development agreement, then another twelve to twenty-four months to open the first restaurant depending on site control and construction. Airport units run longer still, because the concession RFP cycle itself takes three to five years.
FAQ
Can I open a LongHorn Steakhouse franchise in the United States?
Not as a street-side restaurant. Darden owns and operates every domestic LongHorn location and has never franchised one. The only US path is an airport terminal unit, and those are licensed through master concessionaires who assemble multi-brand packages for airport authority concession bids — not sold directly to individual operators.
What is the total investment for the paths that do exist?
Darden's disclosed range for its international and airport program runs roughly $2.0M to $3.5M per restaurant. That covers the license fee, build-out and equipment for a full-service kitchen in a 5,500–6,500 square foot space, and working capital for the opening months. Airport builds trend toward the top of that range because terminal construction carries real premiums.
What are the ongoing fees?
The Darden licensing royalty is 5–6% of gross sales, plus a marketing or brand fund contribution of roughly 2–3%. Combined, that is about 7–9% off the top of every dollar of revenue. For comparison, a Texas Roadhouse franchisee's royalty is 4%, making the LongHorn structure three to five percentage points heavier before any restaurant-level cost.
How long until I get my money back?
Model five to eight years for a US airport unit and six to nine years internationally. Airport units generate higher volumes from captive traffic but pay percentage rent to the airport authority and carry elevated labor costs. International units ramp more slowly and face import and currency exposure on their largest input.
What actually disqualifies most applicants?
Capital and résumé, in that order. Darden's expectation sits around $5M net worth with substantial liquidity behind it, and it screens for operators already running ten or more full-service restaurants. Most people asking this question have a fraction of that capital and no multi-unit full-service history, which ends the conversation at the first screen.
If I am disqualified, what should I do instead?
Outback Steakhouse still franchises domestically through Bloomin' Brands at a 4% royalty. Buying an existing Texas Roadhouse franchisee group gets you established cash flow at an acquisition multiple. An independent steakhouse build carries no royalty at all and no approval process, with beef sourcing and local reputation as your competitive moat.
Sources
- Darden International and US Airport Franchising
- Darden Restaurants Investor Relations
- Darden Restaurants filings — SEC EDGAR
- Bloomin' Brands Investor Relations (Outback Steakhouse)
- Texas Roadhouse Investor Relations
- USDA Economic Research Service — Cattle and Beef
- FTC — Buying a Franchise: A Consumer Guide
- HMSHost
- SSP America
- Paradies Lagardère
Related on PULSE
- [Should I open or buy an Outback Steakhouse franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14688)
- [Should I open or buy a Black Angus Steakhouse franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q14689)
- [How Many Employees Should I Schedule Each Shift at My Steakhouse?](/knowledge/q15814)
- [Should I open or buy an Oxi Fresh Carpet Cleaning franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15521)
- [Should I open or buy an Oil Can Henry's franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15520)
- [Should I open or buy a KidStrong franchise in 2027?](/knowledge/q15519)
This page will be disappearing soon. Save it to your device for $1 — or read it free while it is here.
@Kory-White- · if Venmo asks, the last 4 of my number are 2012
This page is gone.
This one is off the shelf now. $1 keeps it on your phone for good — the whole page, pictures and diagrams included.









