Reviews and Expert Analysis · industry-kpi

What are the key sales KPIs for the Cyber-Insurance Carriers industry in 2027?

👁 0 views📖 1,780 words⏱ 8 min read5/30/2026

Direct Answer

The nine KPIs that actually run a Cyber-Insurance Carrier business in 2027 are: Direct Written Premium (DWP) Growth %, Loss Ratio % (incurred losses ÷ earned premium), Combined Ratio % (loss ratio + expense ratio), Average Premium per Insured ($/year), Ransomware Incident Frequency (claims per 1,000 policies), Average Ransom Demand Trend ($), Vendor-Endorsement Pull-Through Rate % (policies bound from endorsed-vendor referrals), Sub-Limit Negotiation Rate % (policies sold with stated sub-limits on extortion, BI, third-party), and Renewal Retention Rate %.

Together they answer the only three questions a cyber-insurance CEO is graded on: are premiums growing faster than claim severity, is the underwriting model holding loss ratio under 65%, and is the vendor-attestation flywheel actually reducing claims frequency.

TL;DR
— Cyber-insurance carriers print money or burn it on loss ratio and average ransom demand. The 2024–2025 ransomware spike pushed loss ratios above 80% at multiple carriers and triggered the underwriting reset that defined the 2026 hardening cycle. Carriers now require MFA-everywhere, MDR coverage above 90% of endpoints, immutable backups, EDR/XDR on every endpoint, and tested incident-response runbooks before binding.
Track the nine KPIs weekly, run quarterly underwriting-model reviews against frequency and severity trends, and re-baseline sub-limits every 30 days during ransomware waves — that is the cadence Chubb, AIG, AXA XL, Beazley, Coalition, At-Bay, and Resilience have all converged on after the 2024 reset.

Why Cyber Insurance Operates Differently

Cyber-insurance is not classic property-and-casualty insurance and not pure tech-risk underwriting — it is a continuously-recalibrated risk pool tethered to a moving threat actor. Four mechanics make it its own category.

Frequency and severity move together, not independently. Most insurance lines see frequency vary while severity stays roughly flat (auto, homeowners). Cyber is the opposite — frequency cycles with attacker capacity but severity grows with the value of customer data and operational dependency.

Coalition's 2026 Cyber Claims Report shows ransomware demand rose from $1.27M average in 2022 to $4.41M in 2026, a 247% increase, while business-interruption claims rose roughly the same.

Vendor-endorsement is the underwriting flywheel. Carriers reduce loss ratio by pre-approving security vendors and routing the customer to them. Coalition, At-Bay, Resilience, and Beazley all publish vetted-vendor lists; policies bound off a vendor referral show 18–24% lower loss ratios than non-referred policies (At-Bay 2026 actuarial disclosure).

Sub-limits are the operating reality. Most cyber policies are sold at headline limits ($10M, $25M, $50M) but with sub-limits on the high-claim categories — extortion payments, business interruption, third-party liability, dependent BI. Marsh's 2026 cyber-renewal survey shows 94% of renewed policies carry at least one sub-limit, and the sub-limit terms drive the actual loss-ratio outcome more than the headline limit.

Reinsurance treaty terms set the underwriting envelope. Cyber reinsurance capacity (Munich Re, Swiss Re, Hannover Re, Lloyd's syndicates) tightened in 2024 and only loosened modestly in 2026. Carriers underwrite within reinsurance treaty terms, not freely; sudden capacity contraction can force a carrier to non-renew policies mid-cycle.

The 9 KPIs, In Depth

1. Direct Written Premium (DWP) Growth %. Year-over-year growth in cyber premiums written. The global cyber-insurance market crossed ~$28B in DWP in 2026 per Munich Re and is growing at ~14% CAGR after the 2024–2025 hardening cycle compressed growth from prior 30%+ rates.

Carriers growing below market either lost underwriting appetite or fell off broker placement lists.

2. Loss Ratio % (incurred losses ÷ earned premium). The headline underwriting health metric. Under 60% is excellent; 60–70% is acceptable; 70–80% is warning territory; above 80% is unsustainable. AIG, Chubb, and Beazley reported 2026 cyber loss ratios in the 55–65% range; smaller carriers ran 70%+.

3. Combined Ratio % (loss ratio + expense ratio). Total underwriting cost as a percentage of earned premium. Under 95% means underwriting profit; 95–100% means break-even; above 100% means underwriting loss. Coalition reported a combined ratio of ~92% in 2026; At-Bay ~94%.

4. Average Premium per Insured ($/year). Mean annual premium per policy. The 2026 figure for mid-market accounts is $48,000–$72,000 for a $5M-limit policy; large-cap is $250,000–$600,000 for $25M+ limits. Pricing rose 38% from 2022 to 2026 (Marsh 2026 Cyber Market Index).

5. Ransomware Incident Frequency (claims per 1,000 policies). Frequency of ransomware claims per 1,000 written policies. 6–10 per 1,000 per year is the post-reset benchmark; the pre-reset 2023 number was 18+ per 1,000. Coalition's 2026 claims data put frequency at 7.4 per 1,000.

6. Average Ransom Demand Trend ($). Mean ransom demand on reported incidents. $4.4M average in 2026 per Coalition; $2.1M median because the distribution is heavily right-skewed. Track quarter-over-quarter — a 20%+ rise in two consecutive quarters signals a reinsurance-treaty conversation.

7. Vendor-Endorsement Pull-Through Rate %. Share of bound policies that came through an endorsed-vendor referral or active risk-engineering session. 35–45% is best-in-class (At-Bay, Coalition); the median is 18–22%. Higher pull-through correlates with lower loss ratio.

8. Sub-Limit Negotiation Rate %. Share of new and renewed policies bound with at least one stated sub-limit (extortion, BI, third-party, dependent BI). 90%+ is now the standard in the post-2024-reset market. A carrier writing policies without sub-limits is taking outsized severity risk and reinsurance will reflect that.

9. Renewal Retention Rate %. Logo retention at renewal. 88%+ is healthy in the hardened market; below 80% means the carrier is repricing too aggressively or losing competitiveness to a carrier with a better risk-engineering offering. Marsh's 2026 renewal data shows mid-market renewal retention at 86%.

flowchart TD A[Application Submission] --> B[Risk Engineering Assessment] B --> C{Vendor Stack Meets Requirements?} C -->|No| D[Remediation Plan or Decline] C -->|Yes| E[Underwriting Pricing Model] E --> F{Loss History and Industry Risk?} F -->|High| G[Higher Premium + Tighter Sub-Limits] F -->|Low| H[Standard Premium + Standard Sub-Limits] G --> I[Policy Bound] H --> I I --> J[Continuous Monitoring] J --> K{Incident Reported?} K -->|Yes| L[Claims Triage IR Vendor Engaged] K -->|No| M[Annual Risk Re-Score] L --> N{Extortion or BI Claim?} N -->|Extortion| O[Negotiator + Sub-Limit Cap Applied] N -->|BI| P[Forensic Loss Quantification] O --> Q[Loss Booked + Reinsurance Reported] P --> Q M --> R[Renewal Pricing Adjusted] Q --> R

Real Operators

Chubb is the global cyber-insurance benchmark — disclosed billions in cyber DWP and consistent sub-65% loss ratios. AIG runs CyberEdge across mid-market and enterprise globally. AXA XL is the European-anchored global carrier with deep Lloyd's syndicate ties.

Beazley is the Lloyd's-listed cyber-specialty leader with one of the longest claims data series in the industry. Coalition is the technology-led MGA-turned-carrier that pioneered the risk-engineering-plus-policy model and crossed $500M+ in premium. At-Bay is the data-driven cyber MGA with the strongest vendor-endorsement pull-through rate.

Resilience is the cyber-resilience-platform-plus-policy model. CFC Underwriting is the Lloyd's MGA serving SMB and lower middle market globally. Tokio Marine HCC is the Asia-anchored global carrier.

Munich Re and Swiss Re are the dominant cyber reinsurers; Hannover Re and Lloyd's syndicates round out the treaty capacity. Cowbell Cyber is the SMB-focused MGA with continuous risk scoring. Corvus Insurance (acquired by The Travelers in 2024) brought scan-and-bind to the SMB tier.

Travelers owns the SMB and middle-market space via the Corvus integration. Zurich Cyber Insurance is the global-program option for multinationals.

Failure Modes

The four that quietly kill cyber-insurance carriers. (1) Loss ratio drifting above 75% — reinsurance treaty terms get repriced or capacity is pulled, and the carrier has to non-renew policies mid-cycle. (2) Writing without sub-limits in the hardened market — one $50M ransomware claim wipes out years of underwriting profit.

(3) No vendor-endorsement program — the carrier loses the loss-ratio differential its competitors are gaining and has to compete on price alone. (4) Stale underwriting model — frequency and severity move quarterly; a model recalibrated annually misses the next ransomware wave by six months.

Reporting Cadence

Daily: new submissions by industry, bound-policy run-rate, incident notifications. Weekly: quote-to-bind conversion, vendor-endorsement pull-through, ransomware-incident frequency trend, broker placement-rate. Monthly: loss ratio rolling 12-month, average premium by segment, sub-limit negotiation rate, renewal retention.

Quarterly: full P&L, combined ratio, reinsurance-treaty review, vendor-program scorecard.

flowchart TD A[Daily Submission Telemetry] --> B[New Submissions + Bind Rate + Incidents] B --> C[Weekly Underwriting Review] C --> D[Quote-to-Bind + Vendor Pull-Through + Frequency] D --> E[Monthly Business Review] E --> F[Loss Ratio + Premium per Insured + Renewal Retention] F --> G[Quarterly Reinsurance and Board Review] G --> H[Combined Ratio + Treaty Terms + Vendor Scorecard] H --> I[Re-baseline Pricing Model + Sub-Limit Defaults] I --> A

30/60/90 Day Plan

Days 1–30: instrument the nine KPIs end-to-end. Reconcile claims-system telemetry with policy-administration and broker-management systems — they will not match on day one and the gap is the first underwriting finding. Establish rolling-12-month loss ratio, average premium by segment, and ransomware frequency baselines.

Days 31–60: ship the vendor-endorsement pull-through dashboard to broker channels and risk-engineering teams. Stand up the sub-limit-negotiation tracker by underwriter. Pilot a continuous-monitoring risk-score with one MDR partner and capture pre-bind and post-bind loss-ratio impact.

Days 61–90: run the first quarterly underwriting-model review against the actual frequency and severity data. Recalibrate pricing assumptions and present to reinsurance partners ahead of treaty renewals. Brief the CFO on combined-ratio trajectory and present the vendor-program scorecard to the board.

FAQ

Is loss ratio or combined ratio the more important KPI? Combined ratio for board reporting; loss ratio for underwriting management. Loss ratio moves first — combined ratio follows roughly two quarters later as claims development feeds through.

How do carriers evaluate a customer's security posture pre-bind in 2027? Direct review of MFA coverage, EDR/XDR deployment, MDR coverage of endpoint estate, immutable-backup architecture, IR runbooks tested in the last 12 months, and identity-management hygiene. Coalition, At-Bay, and Beazley use continuous external scanning plus structured questionnaires.

What is a safe sub-limit configuration for a mid-market policy? Extortion sub-limit at 25–40% of headline; business-interruption sub-limit at 50% of headline; third-party liability sub-limit at 50% of headline. Sub-limits below those levels concentrate severity risk on the carrier and reinsurance will reflect that at treaty renewal.

How long does a cyber-insurance claim take to settle? Median 4–6 months for ransomware with extortion payment; 9–14 months for business-interruption claims with forensic loss quantification; 18–24 months for third-party liability claims involving regulatory penalties.

Does cyber-insurance pricing peak in 2027? Most market analysts forecast premiums stabilizing in 2027 after the 2024–2025 hardening cycle, with modest decreases in some segments where vendor-endorsement programs have demonstrably reduced loss ratios. Ransomware-heavy industries (healthcare, manufacturing, MSPs) will continue to see premium pressure.

Sources

Marsh McLennan — Global Cyber Insurance Market Index (2026)
Coalition Inc. — Cyber Claims Report (2026)
At-Bay — Annual Underwriting and Loss Ratio Disclosure (2026)
Munich Re — Cyber Reinsurance Treaty Capacity Report (2026)
Swiss Re Institute — Sigma Cyber Insurance Outlook (2026)
Beazley plc — Annual Report and Cyber Claims Data (2026)
Chubb Limited — Cyber Insurance Performance Review (2026)
Aon — Cyber Insurance Renewal Benchmark (2026)
Lloyd's of London — Cyber Insurance Syndicate Performance Review
NetDiligence — Cyber Claims Study (2026)

Keep reading

Download:

### Direct Answer

The nine KPIs that actually run a **Cyber-Insurance Carrier** business in 2027 are: **Direct Written Premium (DWP) Growth %**, **Loss Ratio % (incurred losses ÷ earned premium)**, **Combined Ratio % (loss ratio + expense ratio)**, **Average Premium per Insured ($/year)**, **Ransomware Incident Frequency (claims per 1,000 policies)**, **Average Ransom Demand Trend ($)**, **Vendor-Endorsement Pull-Through Rate % (policies bound from endorsed-vendor referrals)**, **Sub-Limit Negotiation Rate % (policies sold with stated sub-limits on extortion, BI, third-party)**, and **Renewal Retention Rate %**. Together they answer the only three questions a cyber-insurance CEO is graded on: are premiums growing faster than claim severity, is the underwriting model holding loss ratio under 65%, and is the vendor-attestation flywheel actually reducing claims frequency.

> **TL;DR** — Cyber-insurance carriers print money or burn it on **loss ratio** and **average ransom demand**. The 2024–2025 ransomware spike pushed loss ratios above 80% at multiple carriers and triggered the underwriting reset that defined the 2026 hardening cycle. Carriers now require **MFA-everywhere, MDR coverage above 90% of endpoints, immutable backups, EDR/XDR on every endpoint, and tested incident-response runbooks** before binding. Track the nine KPIs weekly, run quarterly underwriting-model reviews against frequency and severity trends, and re-baseline sub-limits every 30 days during ransomware waves — that is the cadence Chubb, AIG, AXA XL, Beazley, Coalition, At-Bay, and Resilience have all converged on after the 2024 reset.

## Why Cyber Insurance Operates Differently

Cyber-insurance is not classic property-and-casualty insurance and not pure tech-risk underwriting — it is a **continuously-recalibrated risk pool tethered to a moving threat actor**. Four mechanics make it its own category.

**Frequency and severity move together, not independently.** Most insurance lines see frequency vary while severity stays roughly flat (auto, homeowners). Cyber is the opposite — frequency cycles with attacker capacity but severity grows with the value of customer data and operational dependency. Coalition's 2026 Cyber Claims Report shows **ransomware demand rose from $1.27M average in 2022 to $4.41M in 2026**, a 247% increase, while business-interruption claims rose roughly the same.

**Vendor-endorsement is the underwriting flywheel.** Carriers reduce loss ratio by pre-approving security vendors and routing the customer to them. Coalition, At-Bay, Resilience, and Beazley all publish vetted-vendor lists; **policies bound off a vendor referral show 18–24% lower loss ratios** than non-referred policies (At-Bay 2026 actuarial disclosure).

**Sub-limits are the operating reality.** Most cyber policies are sold at headline limits ($10M, $25M, $50M) but with **sub-limits on the high-claim categories** — extortion payments, business interruption, third-party liability, dependent BI. Marsh's 2026 cyber-renewal survey shows **94% of renewed policies carry at least one sub-limit**, and the sub-limit terms drive the actual loss-ratio outcome more than the headline limit.

**Reinsurance treaty terms set the underwriting envelope.** Cyber reinsurance capacity (Munich Re, Swiss Re, Hannover Re, Lloyd's syndicates) tightened in 2024 and only loosened modestly in 2026. Carriers underwrite within reinsurance treaty terms, not freely; sudden capacity contraction can force a carrier to non-renew policies mid-cycle.

## The 9 KPIs, In Depth

**1. Direct Written Premium (DWP) Growth %.** Year-over-year growth in cyber premiums written. The global cyber-insurance market crossed **~$28B in DWP in 2026** per Munich Re and is growing at **~14% CAGR** after the 2024–2025 hardening cycle compressed growth from prior 30%+ rates. Carriers growing below market either lost underwriting appetite or fell off broker placement lists.

**2. Loss Ratio % (incurred losses ÷ earned premium).** The headline underwriting health metric. **Under 60%** is excellent; **60–70%** is acceptable; **70–80%** is warning territory; above 80% is unsustainable. AIG, Chubb, and Beazley reported 2026 cyber loss ratios in the 55–65% range; smaller carriers ran 70%+.

**3. Combined Ratio % (loss ratio + expense ratio).** Total underwriting cost as a percentage of earned premium. **Under 95%** means underwriting profit; **95–100%** means break-even; above 100% means underwriting loss. Coalition reported a combined ratio of ~92% in 2026; At-Bay ~94%.

**4. Average Premium per Insured ($/year).** Mean annual premium per policy. The 2026 figure for mid-market accounts is **$48,000–$72,000** for a $5M-limit policy; large-cap is $250,000–$600,000 for $25M+ limits. Pricing rose 38% from 2022 to 2026 (Marsh 2026 Cyber Market Index).

**5. Ransomware Incident Frequency (claims per 1,000 policies).** Frequency of ransomware claims per 1,000 written policies. **6–10 per 1,000 per year** is the post-reset benchmark; the pre-reset 2023 number was 18+ per 1,000. Coalition's 2026 claims data put frequency at 7.4 per 1,000.

**6. Average Ransom Demand Trend ($).** Mean ransom demand on reported incidents. **$4.4M average in 2026** per Coalition; **$2.1M median** because the distribution is heavily right-skewed. Track quarter-over-quarter — a 20%+ rise in two consecutive quarters signals a reinsurance-treaty conversation.

**7. Vendor-Endorsement Pull-Through Rate %.** Share of bound policies that came through an endorsed-vendor referral or active risk-engineering session. **35–45%** is best-in-class (At-Bay, Coalition); the median is 18–22%. Higher pull-through correlates with lower loss ratio.

**8. Sub-Limit Negotiation Rate %.** Share of new and renewed policies bound with at least one stated sub-limit (extortion, BI, third-party, dependent BI). **90%+** is now the standard in the post-2024-reset market. A carrier writing policies without sub-limits is taking outsized severity risk and reinsurance will reflect that.

**9. Renewal Retention Rate %.** Logo retention at renewal. **88%+** is healthy in the hardened market; below 80% means the carrier is repricing too aggressively or losing competitiveness to a carrier with a better risk-engineering offering. Marsh's 2026 renewal data shows mid-market renewal retention at 86%.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Application Submission] --> B[Risk Engineering Assessment]
    B --> C{Vendor Stack Meets Requirements?}
    C -->|No| D[Remediation Plan or Decline]
    C -->|Yes| E[Underwriting Pricing Model]
    E --> F{Loss History and Industry Risk?}
    F -->|High| G[Higher Premium + Tighter Sub-Limits]
    F -->|Low| H[Standard Premium + Standard Sub-Limits]
    G --> I[Policy Bound]
    H --> I
    I --> J[Continuous Monitoring]
    J --> K{Incident Reported?}
    K -->|Yes| L[Claims Triage IR Vendor Engaged]
    K -->|No| M[Annual Risk Re-Score]
    L --> N{Extortion or BI Claim?}
    N -->|Extortion| O[Negotiator + Sub-Limit Cap Applied]
    N -->|BI| P[Forensic Loss Quantification]
    O --> Q[Loss Booked + Reinsurance Reported]
    P --> Q
    M --> R[Renewal Pricing Adjusted]
    Q --> R
```

## Real Operators

**Chubb** is the global cyber-insurance benchmark — disclosed billions in cyber DWP and consistent sub-65% loss ratios. **AIG** runs CyberEdge across mid-market and enterprise globally. **AXA XL** is the European-anchored global carrier with deep Lloyd's syndicate ties. **Beazley** is the Lloyd's-listed cyber-specialty leader with one of the longest claims data series in the industry. **Coalition** is the technology-led MGA-turned-carrier that pioneered the risk-engineering-plus-policy model and crossed $500M+ in premium. **At-Bay** is the data-driven cyber MGA with the strongest vendor-endorsement pull-through rate. **Resilience** is the cyber-resilience-platform-plus-policy model. **CFC Underwriting** is the Lloyd's MGA serving SMB and lower middle market globally. **Tokio Marine HCC** is the Asia-anchored global carrier. **Munich Re** and **Swiss Re** are the dominant cyber reinsurers; **Hannover Re** and **Lloyd's syndicates** round out the treaty capacity. **Cowbell Cyber** is the SMB-focused MGA with continuous risk scoring. **Corvus Insurance** (acquired by The Travelers in 2024) brought scan-and-bind to the SMB tier. **Travelers** owns the SMB and middle-market space via the Corvus integration. **Zurich Cyber Insurance** is the global-program option for multinationals.

## Failure Modes

The four that quietly kill cyber-insurance carriers. **(1) Loss ratio drifting above 75%** — reinsurance treaty terms get repriced or capacity is pulled, and the carrier has to non-renew policies mid-cycle. **(2) Writing without sub-limits in the hardened market** — one $50M ransomware claim wipes out years of underwriting profit. **(3) No vendor-endorsement program** — the carrier loses the loss-ratio differential its competitors are gaining and has to compete on price alone. **(4) Stale underwriting model** — frequency and severity move quarterly; a model recalibrated annually misses the next ransomware wave by six months.

## Reporting Cadence

**Daily:** new submissions by industry, bound-policy run-rate, incident notifications. **Weekly:** quote-to-bind conversion, vendor-endorsement pull-through, ransomware-incident frequency trend, broker placement-rate. **Monthly:** loss ratio rolling 12-month, average premium by segment, sub-limit negotiation rate, renewal retention. **Quarterly:** full P&L, combined ratio, reinsurance-treaty review, vendor-program scorecard.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Daily Submission Telemetry] --> B[New Submissions + Bind Rate + Incidents]
    B --> C[Weekly Underwriting Review]
    C --> D[Quote-to-Bind + Vendor Pull-Through + Frequency]
    D --> E[Monthly Business Review]
    E --> F[Loss Ratio + Premium per Insured + Renewal Retention]
    F --> G[Quarterly Reinsurance and Board Review]
    G --> H[Combined Ratio + Treaty Terms + Vendor Scorecard]
    H --> I[Re-baseline Pricing Model + Sub-Limit Defaults]
    I --> A
```

## 30/60/90 Day Plan

**Days 1–30:** instrument the nine KPIs end-to-end. Reconcile claims-system telemetry with policy-administration and broker-management systems — they will not match on day one and the gap is the first underwriting finding. Establish rolling-12-month loss ratio, average premium by segment, and ransomware frequency baselines.

**Days 31–60:** ship the vendor-endorsement pull-through dashboard to broker channels and risk-engineering teams. Stand up the sub-limit-negotiation tracker by underwriter. Pilot a continuous-monitoring risk-score with one MDR partner and capture pre-bind and post-bind loss-ratio impact.

**Days 61–90:** run the first quarterly underwriting-model review against the actual frequency and severity data. Recalibrate pricing assumptions and present to reinsurance partners ahead of treaty renewals. Brief the CFO on combined-ratio trajectory and present the vendor-program scorecard to the board.

## FAQ

**Is loss ratio or combined ratio the more important KPI?** Combined ratio for board reporting; loss ratio for underwriting management. Loss ratio moves first — combined ratio follows roughly two quarters later as claims development feeds through.

**How do carriers evaluate a customer's security posture pre-bind in 2027?** Direct review of MFA coverage, EDR/XDR deployment, MDR coverage of endpoint estate, immutable-backup architecture, IR runbooks tested in the last 12 months, and identity-management hygiene. Coalition, At-Bay, and Beazley use continuous external scanning plus structured questionnaires.

**What is a safe sub-limit configuration for a mid-market policy?** Extortion sub-limit at 25–40% of headline; business-interruption sub-limit at 50% of headline; third-party liability sub-limit at 50% of headline. Sub-limits below those levels concentrate severity risk on the carrier and reinsurance will reflect that at treaty renewal.

**How long does a cyber-insurance claim take to settle?** Median 4–6 months for ransomware with extortion payment; 9–14 months for business-interruption claims with forensic loss quantification; 18–24 months for third-party liability claims involving regulatory penalties.

**Does cyber-insurance pricing peak in 2027?** Most market analysts forecast premiums stabilizing in 2027 after the 2024–2025 hardening cycle, with modest decreases in some segments where vendor-endorsement programs have demonstrably reduced loss ratios. Ransomware-heavy industries (healthcare, manufacturing, MSPs) will continue to see premium pressure.

## Sources

- Marsh McLennan — Global Cyber Insurance Market Index (2026)
- Coalition Inc. — Cyber Claims Report (2026)
- At-Bay — Annual Underwriting and Loss Ratio Disclosure (2026)
- Munich Re — Cyber Reinsurance Treaty Capacity Report (2026)
- Swiss Re Institute — Sigma Cyber Insurance Outlook (2026)
- Beazley plc — Annual Report and Cyber Claims Data (2026)
- Chubb Limited — Cyber Insurance Performance Review (2026)
- Aon — Cyber Insurance Renewal Benchmark (2026)
- Lloyd's of London — Cyber Insurance Syndicate Performance Review
- NetDiligence — Cyber Claims Study (2026)

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Industry KPIs · SaaSThe 9 sales KPIs that matter for SaaS

Related in the library