13/13 Gate✓ IQ Certified10/10?

How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting?

📖 2,100 words🗓️ Published Jun 23, 2026

Direct Answer

Permits and expediting are a place where you can quietly overpay by thousands without ever knowing the real number, so separate the two costs cleanly: the municipal permit fee itself is fixed by code — usually a percentage of construction valuation, commonly 0.5–2% of project cost plus plan-check and impact fees — and you cannot negotiate it. What you *can* control is everything around it: the expediter's fee (typically $2,000–$10,000 for a standard commercial TI, or 1–3% of construction cost on larger jobs), the valuation you report (over-stating it inflates the fee), and the number of resubmittals (every rejected set restarts the clock and can trigger re-review fees). The single biggest money move is to get the permit set right the first time — a clean, code-compliant submittal that sails through one plan-check round saves you weeks of carrying cost and the expediter's hourly drip. The biggest screw-job to avoid: paying an expediter a fat percentage fee to do nothing but stand in line when your jurisdiction allows online or over-the-counter permits for minor TI work that needs no expediter at all. Always ask the building department directly what your project actually requires — and never let a GC bundle "permits and fees" into a lump sum, because that's where they pad an extra 10–20% you'll never see itemized.

Permit Fees vs. Expediting: Know What You're Actually Paying For

These two costs get blurred together on bids and they are completely different animals. Permit fees are statutory — set by the municipality, published in a fee schedule, and non-negotiable. They generally include:

Building permit fee — usually a sliding percentage of the declared construction valuation, commonly 0.5–2%.
Plan-check / plan-review fee — often 65–100% of the building permit fee in many jurisdictions.
Trade permits — separate mechanical, electrical, and plumbing permits, each with its own fee.
Impact and use fees — water/sewer connection, fire, school, and traffic impact fees that can dwarf the building fee on a change-of-use or new construction.

Expediting is a service you hire — a person or firm who shepherds your application through the building department, manages resubmittals, and knows the local plan-checkers. Their fee is 100% negotiable and ranges from $2,000–$10,000 flat for routine commercial TI up to 1–3% of construction cost on complex projects. The mistake is treating the expediter fee as fixed. It isn't. You are paying for speed and navigation, not for the permit itself.

Don't Overpay the Permit Fee Itself

You can't negotiate the rate, but you can avoid inflating the base it's calculated on:

Declare the right construction valuation. Permit fees scale with reported job value. Over-stating valuation — which GCs sometimes do to be "safe" — directly inflates your fee. Report the real, defensible number.
Scope out work that doesn't need a permit. Painting, carpet, and like-for-like fixture swaps usually need no permit. Don't let a GC permit the whole job when only the MEP and structural portions require it.
Check for fee caps and small-project thresholds. Many cities cap fees or offer reduced over-the-counter review for small TI under a square-footage or dollar threshold. Ask before you file.
Avoid double permits. A poorly sequenced job can require re-permitting. Permit the complete scope once rather than piecemeal.

Don't Overpay the Expediter — Or Pay One You Don't Need

The expediter is where the negotiable money lives. Defend it:

First, find out if you even need one. Call the building department. For routine commercial TI in a responsive jurisdiction, your GC or architect can file directly and you skip the expediter entirely — saving the whole fee. Expediters earn their keep only in slow, bureaucratic, or specialized jurisdictions (think major-metro plan checks that run weeks).
Negotiate a flat fee, not a percentage. A percentage fee on construction cost rewards the expediter for your project being expensive, which is backwards. A flat $3,000–$8,000 for a defined scope aligns incentives.
Define the deliverable. The fee should cover filing, plan-check tracking, resubmittal management, and permit pickup — in writing. Vague "expediting services" invites scope creep and hourly add-ons.
Don't pay for their delays. If resubmittals are caused by an incomplete set the expediter or architect should have caught, that's not a billable extra.

The worst overpay is the percentage expediter on a simple job — paying someone $6,000 to walk a counter-approvable permit through a window. Match the service to the actual difficulty.

The Real Cost Is Carrying Time — Get the Set Right Once

Here is the cost almost nobody tracks: every resubmittal cycle restarts the plan-check clock and bleeds carrying cost. A rejected permit set in a major metro can add 3–8 weeks, and during that time you're paying rent (if your clock has started), idle GC mobilization, and sometimes re-review fees. The math: on a space at $40,000 a month in rent, a single avoidable 6-week resubmittal delay costs $60,000 — far more than the permit fee itself.

So the cheapest permit strategy is a clean, complete, code-compliant submittal that passes in one round. That means:

An architect who knows the local code and has done permits in that jurisdiction recently.
A pre-application meeting with the plan-checker on anything unusual — free, and it surfaces objections before you file.
A complete set — no "we'll detail that later" gaps that trigger automatic kickbacks.

Watch the GC's "Permits and Fees" Lump Sum

When a GC bid shows a single "permits and fees" line, that is a place to push. GCs commonly estimate high and pocket the difference, or add a markup on the actual government fee. Demand:

Permits and fees at cost, with receipts. Government fees are pass-through. There is no legitimate markup on a statutory fee.
Expediting broken out separately, with the negotiated flat number.
A reconciliation at closeout — if the GC estimated $18,000 in permits and the actual fees came to $12,000, the $6,000 is yours, not theirs.

The principle: permit fees are a pass-through cost, expediting is a negotiable service, and the GC's lump sum is where both get marked up. Itemize all three and you stop overpaying.

flowchart TD A[Buildout scope defined] --> B{Does work need a permit?} B -->|Minor cosmetic| C["Often no permit / over-the-counter"] B -->|Structural/MEP/use change| D[Full plan-check permit] C --> E[Skip expediter, file direct] D --> F{Complex or slow jurisdiction?} F -->|No| G[GC or you file, no expediter] F -->|Yes| H[Hire expediter, negotiate flat fee] H --> I[Clean first submittal] G --> I I --> J{Approved first round?} J -->|Yes| K[Pay statutory fee only] J -->|No| L[Resubmittal = re-review fee + delay]

flowchart LR A[Sloppy set, multiple resubmittals] --> B[3-8 week delay] B --> C[Rent + idle GC + re-review fees] C --> D[$50K-$100K+ avoidable cost] E[Clean set, one round] --> F[Fast approval] F --> G[Statutory fee only, clock protected]

Related on PULSE

[What Is a Construction Draw Schedule and How Do I Avoid Overpaying?](/knowledge/q13669)
[How Do I Get a Lease Termination Right Tied to Permits or Financing?](/knowledge/q13835)
[What consolidation strategies help RevOps avoid AI vendor switching costs?](/knowledge/q16647)
[What percentage of 2027 B2B pipeline should come from AI-sourced leads to avoid saturation?](/knowledge/q16491)
[How Do I Avoid the 'Controllable vs Uncontrollable' CAM Trap?](/knowledge/q13749)
[How Do I Avoid Paying for Vacant-Space Costs in CAM?](/knowledge/q13724)

Understanding Expediter Pricing Models

Expediters typically charge in one of three ways: a flat fee, an hourly rate, or a percentage of construction valuation. Flat fees for a standard commercial tenant improvement range from $2,000 to $8,000, while hourly rates (common for complex projects) run $100–$250 per hour. Percentage-based fees (usually 1–3% of construction cost) can balloon quickly on larger jobs. Before signing, ask for a written breakdown of what's included: plan submission, follow-ups, corrections, and final sign-off. Some expediters charge extra for "re-submissions" or "expedited reviews" — clarify these upfront to avoid surprise invoices.

Red Flags That Signal You're Overpaying

Watch for these warning signs: an expediter who won't provide a fixed fee or capped hourly estimate; vague descriptions like "processing fees" or "miscellaneous charges" without itemization; or pressure to pay the full fee before any work begins. Also be wary if the expediter quotes a fee that's more than 10–15% of your total permit cost — for a typical $50,000 permit fee, the expediter should cost $5,000–$7,500 maximum. If they demand a retainer over 50% upfront, that's another red flag. Always get at least three quotes from licensed expediters and compare their scope of work side-by-side.

DIY vs. Hiring an Expediter: When It's Worth It

For simple permits (like a sign or minor electrical work under $10,000 construction value), you can often handle the process yourself in 1–3 days of research and submissions. But for complex projects with zoning variances, structural changes, or multiple city departments, a professional expediter typically saves 2–6 weeks of delays — and that time savings often justifies their fee. The breakeven point is usually around $15,000–$20,000 in permit fees: below that, DIY may be cheaper; above it, an expediter's expertise prevents costly mistakes and re-submissions.

FAQ

What is the typical cost range for building permits? Building permit fees vary widely by municipality and project scope, typically ranging from a few hundred dollars for minor alterations to tens of thousands for large commercial buildouts. Most jurisdictions calculate fees based on a percentage of construction value, often between 0.5% and 2% of the total project cost.

How much should I expect to pay for an expediter? Expediting fees are separate from permit costs and usually fall between $500 and $5,000 for standard commercial tenant improvements, depending on complexity and local requirements. High-volume or rush jobs can push fees toward the upper end, but anything above that range warrants scrutiny.

What hidden costs often inflate permit and expediting bills? Common hidden charges include “plan review fees,” “zoning verification fees,” and “re-inspection fees” that can add 20–50% to your initial estimate. Always ask for a full breakdown of all line items before signing any agreement.

How can I verify if a permit fee quote is fair? Request the jurisdiction’s official fee schedule or use online calculators provided by many city building departments. Compare the quote against that schedule and ask for the specific code sections used to calculate your fee.

Should I hire my own expediter or use the contractor’s recommended one? Either can work, but using your own expediter gives you direct control over costs and timelines. If you use the contractor’s choice, insist on a separate, transparent invoice for expediting services—never bundle it into the general construction price.

What questions should I ask before paying for expediting services? Ask for a fixed fee or a not-to-exceed amount, a list of all tasks included (e.g., submissions, follow-ups, resubmissions), and their average turnaround time. Also confirm whether they charge extra for multiple plan revisions or weekend work.

Sources

International Code Council (ICC) — Permit valuation and fee schedule methodology.
CBRE — Tenant fit-out cost guides and permitting timeline benchmarks.
JLL — U.S. Construction Outlook and project entitlement/permitting analysis.
Cushman & Wakefield — Project and development services advisory on permitting risk.
NAIOP (Commercial Real Estate Development Association) — Entitlement and impact-fee research.
AGC (Associated General Contractors) — Construction cost and general-conditions benchmarking.
BOMA International — Tenant improvement and code-compliance guidance.
Local building department fee schedules (e.g., NYC DOB, City of Los Angeles LADBS) — published statutory permit and plan-check fees.

Download:

![How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting?](https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/sync/v2/D4E27AQGjv-e7BQTTvw/articleshare-shrink_1280_800/B4EZZFC.U9HgAU-/0/1744915130452?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=O3djk_j62-snju6VtIBTUfPyLpKs-FcJJcRTCUHey5o)

<svg xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1200 340" role="img" aria-label="How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting? — PULSE Buildouts"><rect width="1200" height="340" fill="#EBE9DE"/><rect width="14" height="340" fill="#C0531F"/><text x="58" y="116" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="32" font-weight="800" letter-spacing="3" fill="#C0531F">PULSE BUILDOUTS · COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE</text><text x="56" y="198" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="60" font-weight="800" fill="#2b2b2b">Save money. Don&#8217;t get screwed.</text><text x="58" y="258" font-family="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" font-size="30" font-weight="600" fill="#6b5b4d">Leases, TI, NNN &amp; buildouts — negotiated in your favor</text><g transform="translate(1010,86)" fill="none" stroke="#C0531F" stroke-width="9" stroke-linejoin="round"><rect x="20" y="40" width="150" height="130"/><line x1="20" y1="40" x2="95" y2="6"/><line x1="170" y1="40" x2="95" y2="6"/><rect x="50" y="80" width="36" height="36"/><rect x="104" y="80" width="36" height="36"/><rect x="74" y="128" width="42" height="42"/></g></svg>

# How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting?

## Direct Answer

Permits and expediting are a place where you can quietly overpay by thousands without ever knowing the real number, so separate the two costs cleanly: the **municipal permit fee itself is fixed by code** — usually a percentage of construction valuation, commonly **0.5–2% of project cost** plus plan-check and impact fees — and you cannot negotiate it. What you *can* control is everything around it: the **expediter's fee** (typically **$2,000–$10,000** for a standard commercial TI, or **1–3% of construction cost** on larger jobs), the **valuation you report** (over-stating it inflates the fee), and the **number of resubmittals** (every rejected set restarts the clock and can trigger re-review fees). The single biggest money move is to **get the permit set right the first time** — a clean, code-compliant submittal that sails through one plan-check round saves you weeks of carrying cost and the expediter's hourly drip. The biggest screw-job to avoid: paying an expediter a fat percentage fee to do nothing but stand in line when your jurisdiction allows **online or over-the-counter permits** for minor TI work that needs no expediter at all. Always ask the building department directly what your project actually requires — and never let a GC bundle "permits and fees" into a lump sum, because that's where they pad an extra **10–20%** you'll never see itemized.

## Permit Fees vs. Expediting: Know What You're Actually Paying For

![How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting? — Permit Fees vs. Expediting: Know What You're Actually Pa](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20Permit%20Fees%20vs.%20Expediting%3A%20Know%20What%20You're%20Actually%20Pa%20How%20Do%20I%20Avoid%20Overpayi%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=53753)


These two costs get blurred together on bids and they are completely different animals. **Permit fees** are statutory — set by the municipality, published in a fee schedule, and non-negotiable. They generally include:

- **Building permit fee** — usually a sliding percentage of the declared construction valuation, commonly **0.5–2%**.
- **Plan-check / plan-review fee** — often **65–100% of the building permit fee** in many jurisdictions.
- **Trade permits** — separate mechanical, electrical, and plumbing permits, each with its own fee.
- **Impact and use fees** — water/sewer connection, fire, school, and traffic impact fees that can dwarf the building fee on a change-of-use or new construction.

**Expediting** is a service you hire — a person or firm who shepherds your application through the building department, manages resubmittals, and knows the local plan-checkers. Their fee is **100% negotiable** and ranges from **$2,000–$10,000** flat for routine commercial TI up to **1–3% of construction cost** on complex projects. The mistake is treating the expediter fee as fixed. It isn't. **You are paying for speed and navigation, not for the permit itself.**

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A[Buildout scope defined] --> B{Does work need a permit?}
  B -->|Minor cosmetic| C[Often no permit / over-the-counter]
  B -->|Structural/MEP/use change| D[Full plan-check permit]
  C --> E[Skip expediter, file direct]
  D --> F{Complex or slow jurisdiction?}
  F -->|No| G[GC or you file, no expediter]
  F -->|Yes| H[Hire expediter, negotiate flat fee]
  H --> I[Clean first submittal]
  G --> I
  I --> J{Approved first round?}
  J -->|Yes| K[Pay statutory fee only]
  J -->|No| L[Resubmittal = re-review fee + delay]
```

## Don't Overpay the Permit Fee Itself

![How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting? — Don't Overpay the Permit Fee Itself](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20Don't%20Overpay%20the%20Permit%20Fee%20Itself%20How%20Do%20I%20Avoid%20Overpaying%20for%20Permits%20and%20Ex%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=2216)


You can't negotiate the rate, but you can avoid inflating the base it's calculated on:

- **Declare the right construction valuation.** Permit fees scale with reported job value. Over-stating valuation — which GCs sometimes do to be "safe" — directly inflates your fee. Report the real, defensible number.
- **Scope out work that doesn't need a permit.** Painting, carpet, and like-for-like fixture swaps usually need no permit. Don't let a GC permit the whole job when only the MEP and structural portions require it.
- **Check for fee caps and small-project thresholds.** Many cities cap fees or offer reduced over-the-counter review for small TI under a square-footage or dollar threshold. Ask before you file.
- **Avoid double permits.** A poorly sequenced job can require re-permitting. Permit the complete scope once rather than piecemeal.

## Don't Overpay the Expediter — Or Pay One You Don't Need

![How Do I Avoid Overpaying for Permits and Expediting? — Don't Overpay the Expediter — Or Pay One You Don't Need](https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/high%20quality%20editorial%20business%20professional%20office%20photograph%20illustrating%20Don't%20Overpay%20the%20Expediter%20%E2%80%94%20Or%20Pay%20One%20You%20Don't%20Need%20How%20Do%20I%20Avoid%20Overpayin%2C%20realistic%20magazine%20style%2C%20warm%20light%2C%20no%20text%2C%20no%20watermark?width=1200&height=675&nologo=true&model=flux&seed=30704)


The expediter is where the negotiable money lives. Defend it:

1. **First, find out if you even need one.** Call the building department. For routine commercial TI in a responsive jurisdiction, your GC or architect can file directly and you skip the expediter entirely — saving the whole fee. Expediters earn their keep only in slow, bureaucratic, or specialized jurisdictions (think major-metro plan checks that run weeks).
2. **Negotiate a flat fee, not a percentage.** A percentage fee on construction cost rewards the expediter for your project being expensive, which is backwards. A **flat $3,000–$8,000** for a defined scope aligns incentives.
3. **Define the deliverable.** The fee should cover filing, plan-check tracking, resubmittal management, and permit pickup — in writing. Vague "expediting services" invites scope creep and hourly add-ons.
4. **Don't pay for their delays.** If resubmittals are caused by an incomplete set the expediter or architect should have caught, that's not a billable extra.

The worst overpay is the **percentage expediter on a simple job** — paying someone **$6,000** to walk a counter-approvable permit through a window. Match the service to the actual difficulty.

## The Real Cost Is Carrying Time — Get the Set Right Once

Here is the cost almost nobody tracks: **every resubmittal cycle restarts the plan-check clock and bleeds carrying cost.** A rejected permit set in a major metro can add **3–8 weeks**, and during that time you're paying rent (if your clock has started), idle GC mobilization, and sometimes re-review fees. The math: on a space at **$40,000 a month** in rent, a single avoidable 6-week resubmittal delay costs **$60,000** — far more than the permit fee itself.

So the cheapest permit strategy is a **clean, complete, code-compliant submittal that passes in one round.** That means:

- An **architect who knows the local code** and has done permits in that jurisdiction recently.
- A **pre-application meeting** with the plan-checker on anything unusual — free, and it surfaces objections before you file.
- A **complete set** — no "we'll detail that later" gaps that trigger automatic kickbacks.

```mermaid
flowchart LR
  A[Sloppy set, multiple resubmittals] --> B[3-8 week delay]
  B --> C[Rent + idle GC + re-review fees]
  C --> D[$50K-$100K+ avoidable cost]
  E[Clean set, one round] --> F[Fast approval]
  F --> G[Statutory fee only, clock protected]
```

## Watch the GC's "Permits and Fees" Lump Sum

When a GC bid shows a single "permits and fees" line, that is a place to push. GCs commonly **estimate high and pocket the difference**, or add a markup on the actual government fee. Demand:

- **Permits and fees at cost, with receipts.** Government fees are pass-through. There is no legitimate markup on a statutory fee.
- **Expediting broken out separately**, with the negotiated flat number.
- **A reconciliation at closeout** — if the GC estimated $18,000 in permits and the actual fees came to $12,000, the **$6,000** is yours, not theirs.

The principle: **permit fees are a pass-through cost, expediting is a negotiable service, and the GC's lump sum is where both get marked up.** Itemize all three and you stop overpaying.

<!--pillar-weave-->
## Related on PULSE

- [What Is a Construction Draw Schedule and How Do I Avoid Overpaying?](/knowledge/q13669)
- [How Do I Get a Lease Termination Right Tied to Permits or Financing?](/knowledge/q13835)
- [What consolidation strategies help RevOps avoid AI vendor switching costs?](/knowledge/q16647)
- [What percentage of 2027 B2B pipeline should come from AI-sourced leads to avoid saturation?](/knowledge/q16491)
- [How Do I Avoid the 'Controllable vs Uncontrollable' CAM Trap?](/knowledge/q13749)
- [How Do I Avoid Paying for Vacant-Space Costs in CAM?](/knowledge/q13724)

## Understanding Expediter Pricing Models

Expediters typically charge in one of three ways: a flat fee, an hourly rate, or a percentage of construction valuation. Flat fees for a standard commercial tenant improvement range from **$2,000 to $8,000**, while hourly rates (common for complex projects) run **$100–$250 per hour**. Percentage-based fees (usually **1–3% of construction cost**) can balloon quickly on larger jobs. Before signing, ask for a written breakdown of what's included: plan submission, follow-ups, corrections, and final sign-off. Some expediters charge extra for "re-submissions" or "expedited reviews" — clarify these upfront to avoid surprise invoices.

## Red Flags That Signal You're Overpaying

Watch for these warning signs: an expediter who won't provide a fixed fee or capped hourly estimate; vague descriptions like "processing fees" or "miscellaneous charges" without itemization; or pressure to pay the full fee before any work begins. Also be wary if the expediter quotes a fee that's more than **10–15% of your total permit cost** — for a typical $50,000 permit fee, the expediter should cost **$5,000–$7,500** maximum. If they demand a retainer over **50% upfront**, that's another red flag. Always get at least three quotes from licensed expediters and compare their scope of work side-by-side.

## DIY vs. Hiring an Expediter: When It's Worth It

For simple permits (like a sign or minor electrical work under **$10,000 construction value**), you can often handle the process yourself in **1–3 days** of research and submissions. But for complex projects with zoning variances, structural changes, or multiple city departments, a professional expediter typically saves **2–6 weeks** of delays — and that time savings often justifies their fee. The breakeven point is usually around **$15,000–$20,000 in permit fees**: below that, DIY may be cheaper; above it, an expediter's expertise prevents costly mistakes and re-submissions.

## FAQ

**What is the typical cost range for building permits?**  
Building permit fees vary widely by municipality and project scope, typically ranging from a few hundred dollars for minor alterations to tens of thousands for large commercial buildouts. Most jurisdictions calculate fees based on a percentage of construction value, often between 0.5% and 2% of the total project cost.

**How much should I expect to pay for an expediter?**  
Expediting fees are separate from permit costs and usually fall between $500 and $5,000 for standard commercial tenant improvements, depending on complexity and local requirements. High-volume or rush jobs can push fees toward the upper end, but anything above that range warrants scrutiny.

**What hidden costs often inflate permit and expediting bills?**  
Common hidden charges include “plan review fees,” “zoning verification fees,” and “re-inspection fees” that can add 20–50% to your initial estimate. Always ask for a full breakdown of all line items before signing any agreement.

**How can I verify if a permit fee quote is fair?**  
Request the jurisdiction’s official fee schedule or use online calculators provided by many city building departments. Compare the quote against that schedule and ask for the specific code sections used to calculate your fee.

**Should I hire my own expediter or use the contractor’s recommended one?**  
Either can work, but using your own expediter gives you direct control over costs and timelines. If you use the contractor’s choice, insist on a separate, transparent invoice for expediting services—never bundle it into the general construction price.

**What questions should I ask before paying for expediting services?**  
Ask for a fixed fee or a not-to-exceed amount, a list of all tasks included (e.g., submissions, follow-ups, resubmissions), and their average turnaround time. Also confirm whether they charge extra for multiple plan revisions or weekend work.

## Sources

- International Code Council (ICC) — Permit valuation and fee schedule methodology.
- CBRE — Tenant fit-out cost guides and permitting timeline benchmarks.
- JLL — U.S. Construction Outlook and project entitlement/permitting analysis.
- Cushman & Wakefield — Project and development services advisory on permitting risk.
- NAIOP (Commercial Real Estate Development Association) — Entitlement and impact-fee research.
- AGC (Associated General Contractors) — Construction cost and general-conditions benchmarking.
- BOMA International — Tenant improvement and code-compliance guidance.
- Local building department fee schedules (e.g., NYC DOB, City of Los Angeles LADBS) — published statutory permit and plan-check fees.

Was this helpful?

Kory White