Reviews and Expert Analysis · book-summary

Solution Selling — Cliff Notes Summary

👁 0 views📖 2,104 words⏱ 10 min read📅 Published Jun 3, 2026

Direct Answer

Solution Selling by Michael Bosworth (McGraw-Hill, 1994) is the book that taught a generation of B2B reps to stop pitching features and start diagnosing pain. Its enduring assets are the 9-Box Vision Processing Model, the Pain Sheet, the Pain Chain, and Situational Fluency — tools that hold up in 2027 as the skeleton beneath modern playbooks like MEDDPICC, Command of the Message, and Gap Selling, even as its 1990s "ask endless open-ended questions" surface has aged poorly against insight-led buyers.

1. The Premise — Why Bosworth Wrote It

A 1990s Reaction to Feature-Dump Selling

By the early 1990s, Bosworth had spent a decade at Xerox Computer Services watching reps lose deals they should have won. His diagnosis: sellers were trained to pitch product, while buyers were drowning in undifferentiated demos. The book opens with the assertion that most buyers cannot articulate what they need — they only feel symptoms.

Sellers who arrive with brochures lose; sellers who arrive with diagnostic questions win.

"Creating Buyers" — The Subtitle Is the Thesis

The full title is Solution Selling: Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets. Bosworth's claim is that in any complex B2B sale, fewer than 5% of the addressable market is actively looking. The remaining 95% are in latent pain — they have the problem, but have not yet admitted it or quantified it.

The rep's job is to make latent pain active through situational questioning, then channel that activated pain into a buying vision that maps to the seller's solution.

Who The Book Is For

It targets enterprise reps, sales managers, and founders selling complex, multi-stakeholder deals where the cycle is 60+ days and at least one C-level signature is involved. If you sell transactional SaaS at $99/month, skip it. If you sell six-figure ACVs with a procurement gauntlet, this is foundational.

2. The 9-Box Vision Processing Model

The Grid Itself

The 9-Box is Bosworth's signature framework. Three rows by three columns:

Rows (the three exploration moves): Diagnose Reasons, Explore Impact, Visualize Capabilities.
Columns (the three question types): Open, Control, Confirm.

You walk the buyer through the grid left-to-right, top-to-bottom. Open questions surface the issue ("Tell me what's happening with month-end close"). Control questions narrow it ("Is it the manual journal entries that are causing the slip?").

Confirm questions lock the answer ("So if I'm hearing you right, the close is sliding from day 5 to day 12 because three controllers are re-keying GL entries — correct?").

Why The Grid Beats Random Discovery

Most reps do discovery as interrogation — a flat list of 30 questions. Bosworth's grid forces a funnel shape: you start wide, prove you can diagnose, then deepen. Every box ends with the buyer agreeing on the record to a piece of pain.

By box 9, the buyer has built their own vision of the solution with the rep's guidance — a vision they own, which is much harder for procurement to kill later.

Modern Read

The 9-Box is still the cleanest discovery scaffold in print. Gong's 2025 conversation-intelligence data shows top reps spend 46% of discovery on impact and only 22% on capabilities — almost exactly the bottom-heavy weighting Bosworth prescribed three decades ago.

3. The Pain Chain

Pain Cascades Up The Org

A VP of Customer Success feels pain because churn is at 14%. Her pain causes the CFO pain because ARR forecast is now under plan. The CFO's pain causes the CEO pain because the board deck has a red box. Bosworth calls this the Pain Chain — and his core selling instruction is never sell to the lowest link.

Building The Chain On A Whiteboard

In a live call, the rep draws boxes left-to-right: frontline → manager → VP → C-suite. Inside each box: who is the person, what is their specific pain in their own words, and what is the dollar consequence of leaving it unfixed. The chain becomes the business case attachment to the proposal.

Where The Pain Chain Beats MEDDIC's "Identify Pain"

MEDDIC ("Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion") names the Pain step but does not give you a *tool* to build it. MEDDPICC added Paper Process and Competition, but still treats pain as a single field. Bosworth's contribution is the vertical wiring — pain must connect economically up the org chart, or your champion has no story for the CFO.

flowchart TD A[Latent Pain Buyer not aware] --> B[Admitted Pain Diagnose Reasons] B --> C[Quantified Impact Explore Impact across org] C --> D[Buying Vision Visualize Capabilities] D --> E[Power Sponsor Letter C-level economic buyer] E --> F[Evaluation Plan Mutually agreed steps] F --> G[Proof Without Free Consulting Reference stories + ROI] G --> H[Negotiation From Value Not from price] C --> C1[Pain Chain Frontline -> CFO -> CEO] C1 --> E

4. The Pain Sheet (Situational Fluency Prompter)

The Most Underused Artifact In The Book

The Pain Sheet — Bosworth later renamed it the Situational Fluency Prompter — is a one-page grid built per buyer role per industry. Columns: Reasons, Impact, Capabilities. Rows: the 3-5 specific pains that role feels.

For a VP of RevOps in B2B SaaS, a Pain Sheet row might read:

Reason: Forecast slips because reps update Salesforce on Friday afternoon from memory.
Impact: CRO walks into Monday QBR with 22% commit-to-close variance versus a CFO tolerance of 8%.
Capability: Activity-capture tool auto-logs emails and calls; forecast pulls from real engagement, not rep guesses.

Why It Wins Deals

A new rep with the right Pain Sheet in front of them sounds like a 20-year veteran of the buyer's industry. The Pain Sheet is what enables Situational Fluency — the perception by the buyer that "this rep gets my world."

How To Build One This Week

Pull your last 20 closed-won deals. For each, write down the one sentence the champion said when they admitted pain in discovery. Cluster the sentences. The top 3-5 clusters are your Pain Sheet rows. Refresh quarterly.

Asking For Access In Writing

Once a champion is committed but the economic buyer (CFO, CEO, division head) is still untouched, Bosworth teaches reps to send a Power Sponsor Letter — a one-page document the champion forwards up the chain. It contains: the admitted pain, the quantified impact, the proposed evaluation steps, and a request for a 30-minute meeting with the power sponsor.

The Trick: The Champion Writes It (Sort Of)

The rep drafts it, the champion edits, the champion sends. The champion's name is on it. This is one of the earliest written templates for what Force Management later branded Champion Enablement.

2027 Update

The Power Sponsor Letter is essentially the original Mutual Action Plan (MAP). Dock, Recapped, and Aligned now ship MAP templates that descend directly from this artifact. The format moved from email PDF to a shared web doc, but the bones are Bosworth's.

6. Reference Stories and The Nine-Block Vision Re-engineering

Reference Stories — Not Case Studies

A reference story is 60 seconds, third-person, named-customer-by-role-not-logo: "A VP of Operations at a mid-market food distributor had this same problem. Within 90 days of switching, they cut their close from 12 days to 4." The story invites the buyer to recognize themselves.

Re-engineering A Vision The Buyer Already Has

If a buyer enters the call already convinced they need Competitor X, Bosworth's prescription is Vision Re-engineering — using the 9-Box in reverse to expose missing capabilities. You confirm their vision, then add one specific question the competitor cannot answer ("When your CFO asks for the forecast confidence interval at month-end, where will that number live?").

The vision now has a hole only you can fill.

Bosworth's Influence On Modern Insight Selling

The Challenger Sale's "Commercial Insight" is a direct evolution of Vision Re-engineering. Force Management's Command of the Message "Required Capability" cards are Pain Sheet columns with a marketing makeover.

7. Where The Book Shows Its Age

Endless Open-Ended Questions

The 1994 prescription assumes buyers arrive uninformed. In 2027, 78% of B2B buyers (Forrester) complete most of their research before booking the demo. Walking in with "Tell me about your business" is now patronizing. Modern operators lead with a point of view, then validate with diagnostic questions — the order flips.

No Multi-Threading Doctrine

The book centers on the single champion + single power sponsor. Gartner's 2024 buying-committee data shows 6.8 average decision-makers per enterprise deal. Bosworth's framework still works inside each stakeholder, but you need a separate Pain Chain per persona — something he never made explicit.

Pre-PLG, Pre-AI

There is no concept of product-led signals, usage-based qualification, or AI co-pilots in discovery. AirDeck CRO RJ Stephens publicly argued in 2025 that "the days of endless open-ended discovery are over" — fair, though he conceded the diagnostic spine still matters.

8. Apply It On Monday Morning

flowchart LR A[Monday 9am Pick 1 stalled deal] --> B[Tuesday Build Pain Chain frontline to CFO] B --> C[Wednesday Draft Pain Sheet per top 3 personas] C --> D[Thursday Run 9-Box discovery with champion] D --> E[Friday Send Power Sponsor Letter via champion] E --> F[Following Monday Economic buyer meeting with MAP attached]

The 60-Minute Drill

Open a closed-lost deal review in your CRM. Re-build the Pain Chain for that lost deal in 15 minutes. In 70% of cases (per the Sales Benchmark Index 2024 win/loss data) the rep never connected pain above the director level.

That single gap explains the loss. Run this drill every Friday for a quarter and your win rate moves 2-4 points.

FAQ

Is Solution Selling still relevant in 2027? The diagnostic spine — 9-Box, Pain Chain, Pain Sheet — is still the cleanest framework in print. The conversational surface (long open-ended questions, single-threaded champion) is dated. Read the book, steal the tools, then layer MEDDPICC qualification and multi-thread maps on top.

Where does it conflict with The Challenger Sale? Matt Dixon's Challenger argues buyers don't know their own pain and need to be taught with Commercial Insight. Bosworth assumes the buyer can be led to articulate their pain with the right questions. In practice, modern reps do both: open with insight, validate with 9-Box.

Solution Selling vs SPIN Selling — which first? Neil Rackham's SPIN (1988) is shorter, more research-backed, and easier to teach. Read SPIN first to internalize Situation-Problem-Implication-Need-Payoff, then read Solution Selling for the operational artifacts (Pain Sheet, Power Sponsor Letter, MAP).

Is the 1994 edition or the 2003 New Solution Selling better? Keith Eades's 2003 The New Solution Selling is the better operational manual — tighter, more checklists, less narrative. The 1994 original is better for why the system exists. Most sales orgs hand the 2003 version to new hires.

My company is PLG — does any of this apply? The 9-Box maps cleanly onto PQL conversion calls. The PQL has revealed pain (their usage data shows the problem). You skip the latent-pain box and start at Explore Impact. Pain Chain still applies — the user who signed up rarely owns the budget.

Bottom Line

Solution Selling is a 1990s book with 2030s bones. The 9-Box Vision Processing Model, the Pain Chain, and the Pain Sheet are still the most teachable artifacts in B2B selling, which is why Force Management, Winning by Design, MEDDPICC, and Command of the Message all trace lineage back to it.

Pick it up when you're building a sales playbook from scratch, when your team's discovery sounds like a product demo with question marks, or when your forecast accuracy is being killed by reps who cannot articulate buyer pain above the manager level. Skip it if you're looking for modern multi-threading, PLG motion design, or AI-augmented discovery — for those, read Gap Selling (Keenan, 2018) and The JOLT Effect (Dixon, 2022) alongside it.

Sources

Michael T. Bosworth, Solution Selling: Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets, McGraw-Hill, 1994 — Amazon page (ISBN 0786303158)
Goodreads community reviews and ratings of Solution Selling — goodreads.com/book/show/514592
Internet Archive full-text scan of the 1994 first edition — archive.org/details/solutionsellingc00bosw
getAbstract structured summary of Solution Selling — getabstract.com/en/summary/solution-selling/4696
Gong blog, "A Complete Guide to the Solution Selling Methodology" — gong.io/blog/solution-selling
Pipedrive blog, "Solution Selling: The Comprehensive Guide" — pipedrive.com/en/blog/solution-selling
MEDDICC official methodology guide on pain qualification — meddicc.com/meddpicc-sales-methodology-and-process
HAVE Trust Selling sales-book review of Solution Selling — havetrustselling.com/sales-book-reviews/solution-selling
Built In explainer on Solution Selling in modern SaaS — builtin.com/articles/solution-selling
Keith Eades, The New Solution Selling, McGraw-Hill, 2003 (referenced as the operational update) — publisher page via McGraw-Hill Education

Keep reading

### Direct Answer

**Solution Selling** by **Michael Bosworth** (McGraw-Hill, 1994) is the book that taught a generation of B2B reps to stop pitching features and start diagnosing **pain**. Its enduring assets are the **9-Box Vision Processing Model**, the **Pain Sheet**, the **Pain Chain**, and **Situational Fluency** — tools that hold up in 2027 as the skeleton beneath modern playbooks like **MEDDPICC**, **Command of the Message**, and **Gap Selling**, even as its 1990s "ask endless open-ended questions" surface has aged poorly against insight-led buyers.

## 1. The Premise — Why Bosworth Wrote It

### A 1990s Reaction to Feature-Dump Selling

By the early 1990s, Bosworth had spent a decade at **Xerox Computer Services** watching reps lose deals they should have won. His diagnosis: sellers were trained to **pitch product**, while buyers were drowning in undifferentiated demos. The book opens with the assertion that **most buyers cannot articulate what they need** — they only feel symptoms. Sellers who arrive with brochures lose; sellers who arrive with **diagnostic questions** win.

### "Creating Buyers" — The Subtitle Is the Thesis

The full title is **Solution Selling: Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets**. Bosworth's claim is that in any complex B2B sale, fewer than **5%** of the addressable market is **actively looking**. The remaining **95%** are in **latent pain** — they have the problem, but have not yet admitted it or quantified it. The rep's job is to **make latent pain active** through situational questioning, then channel that activated pain into a **buying vision** that maps to the seller's solution.

### Who The Book Is For

It targets **enterprise reps**, **sales managers**, and **founders** selling complex, multi-stakeholder deals where the cycle is 60+ days and at least one **C-level signature** is involved. If you sell transactional SaaS at $99/month, skip it. If you sell **six-figure ACVs with a procurement gauntlet**, this is foundational.

## 2. The 9-Box Vision Processing Model

### The Grid Itself

The **9-Box** is Bosworth's signature framework. Three rows by three columns:

- **Rows (the three exploration moves):** **Diagnose Reasons**, **Explore Impact**, **Visualize Capabilities**.
- **Columns (the three question types):** **Open**, **Control**, **Confirm**.

You walk the buyer through the grid left-to-right, top-to-bottom. **Open** questions surface the issue ("Tell me what's happening with month-end close"). **Control** questions narrow it ("Is it the manual journal entries that are causing the slip?"). **Confirm** questions lock the answer ("So if I'm hearing you right, the close is sliding from day 5 to day 12 because three controllers are re-keying GL entries — correct?").

### Why The Grid Beats Random Discovery

Most reps do **discovery as interrogation** — a flat list of 30 questions. Bosworth's grid forces a **funnel shape**: you start wide, prove you can diagnose, then deepen. Every box ends with the buyer **agreeing on the record** to a piece of pain. By box 9, the buyer has built **their own vision** of the solution with the rep's guidance — a vision they own, which is much harder for procurement to kill later.

### Modern Read

The 9-Box is still the cleanest **discovery scaffold** in print. **Gong**'s 2025 conversation-intelligence data shows top reps spend **46% of discovery on impact** and only **22% on capabilities** — almost exactly the bottom-heavy weighting Bosworth prescribed three decades ago.

## 3. The Pain Chain

### Pain Cascades Up The Org

A **VP of Customer Success** feels pain because **churn is at 14%**. Her pain causes the **CFO** pain because ARR forecast is now under plan. The CFO's pain causes the **CEO** pain because the board deck has a red box. Bosworth calls this the **Pain Chain** — and his core selling instruction is **never sell to the lowest link**.

### Building The Chain On A Whiteboard

In a live call, the rep draws boxes left-to-right: **frontline → manager → VP → C-suite**. Inside each box: who is the person, what is their **specific** pain in their own words, and what is the **dollar consequence** of leaving it unfixed. The chain becomes the **business case attachment** to the proposal.

### Where The Pain Chain Beats MEDDIC's "Identify Pain"

**MEDDIC** ("Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion") names the Pain step but does not give you a *tool* to build it. **MEDDPICC** added **P**aper Process and **C**ompetition, but still treats pain as a single field. Bosworth's contribution is the **vertical wiring** — pain must connect economically up the org chart, or your champion has no story for the CFO.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Latent Pain<br/>Buyer not aware] --> B[Admitted Pain<br/>Diagnose Reasons]
    B --> C[Quantified Impact<br/>Explore Impact across org]
    C --> D[Buying Vision<br/>Visualize Capabilities]
    D --> E[Power Sponsor Letter<br/>C-level economic buyer]
    E --> F[Evaluation Plan<br/>Mutually agreed steps]
    F --> G[Proof Without Free Consulting<br/>Reference stories + ROI]
    G --> H[Negotiation From Value<br/>Not from price]
    C --> C1[Pain Chain<br/>Frontline -> CFO -> CEO]
    C1 --> E
```

## 4. The Pain Sheet (Situational Fluency Prompter)

### The Most Underused Artifact In The Book

The **Pain Sheet** — Bosworth later renamed it the **Situational Fluency Prompter** — is a one-page grid built **per buyer role per industry**. Columns: **Reasons**, **Impact**, **Capabilities**. Rows: the **3-5 specific pains** that role feels.

For a **VP of RevOps** in **B2B SaaS**, a Pain Sheet row might read:

- **Reason:** Forecast slips because reps update Salesforce on Friday afternoon from memory.
- **Impact:** CRO walks into Monday QBR with **22% commit-to-close variance** versus a **CFO tolerance of 8%**.
- **Capability:** Activity-capture tool auto-logs emails and calls; forecast pulls from real engagement, not rep guesses.

### Why It Wins Deals

A new rep with the **right Pain Sheet** in front of them sounds like a **20-year veteran** of the buyer's industry. The Pain Sheet is what enables **Situational Fluency** — the perception by the buyer that "this rep gets my world."

### How To Build One This Week

Pull your last **20 closed-won** deals. For each, write down **the one sentence the champion said** when they admitted pain in discovery. Cluster the sentences. The top 3-5 clusters are your Pain Sheet rows. Refresh quarterly.

## 5. The Power Sponsor Letter

### Asking For Access In Writing

Once a **champion** is committed but the **economic buyer** (CFO, CEO, division head) is still untouched, Bosworth teaches reps to send a **Power Sponsor Letter** — a one-page document the champion forwards up the chain. It contains: **the admitted pain**, **the quantified impact**, **the proposed evaluation steps**, and a **request for a 30-minute meeting** with the power sponsor.

### The Trick: The Champion Writes It (Sort Of)

The rep drafts it, the champion edits, the champion sends. The champion's name is on it. This is one of the earliest written templates for what **Force Management** later branded **Champion Enablement**.

### 2027 Update

The Power Sponsor Letter is essentially the original **Mutual Action Plan (MAP)**. **Dock**, **Recapped**, and **Aligned** now ship MAP templates that descend directly from this artifact. The format moved from email PDF to a shared web doc, but the bones are Bosworth's.

## 6. Reference Stories and The Nine-Block Vision Re-engineering

### Reference Stories — Not Case Studies

A **reference story** is **60 seconds, third-person, named-customer-by-role-not-logo**: "A VP of Operations at a mid-market food distributor had this same problem. Within 90 days of switching, they cut their close from 12 days to 4." The story **invites the buyer** to recognize themselves.

### Re-engineering A Vision The Buyer Already Has

If a buyer enters the call already convinced they need **Competitor X**, Bosworth's prescription is **Vision Re-engineering** — using the 9-Box in reverse to expose missing capabilities. You confirm their vision, then add **one specific question** the competitor cannot answer ("When your CFO asks for the forecast confidence interval at month-end, where will that number live?"). The vision now has a hole only you can fill.

### Bosworth's Influence On Modern Insight Selling

The **Challenger Sale**'s "Commercial Insight" is a direct evolution of Vision Re-engineering. **Force Management**'s **Command of the Message** "Required Capability" cards are Pain Sheet columns with a marketing makeover.

## 7. Where The Book Shows Its Age

### Endless Open-Ended Questions

The 1994 prescription assumes buyers arrive **uninformed**. In 2027, **78% of B2B buyers** (Forrester) complete most of their research **before** booking the demo. Walking in with "Tell me about your business" is now patronizing. Modern operators **lead with a point of view**, then validate with diagnostic questions — the order flips.

### No Multi-Threading Doctrine

The book centers on the **single champion + single power sponsor**. **Gartner**'s 2024 buying-committee data shows **6.8 average decision-makers** per enterprise deal. Bosworth's framework still works inside each stakeholder, but you need a **separate Pain Chain per persona** — something he never made explicit.

### Pre-PLG, Pre-AI

There is no concept of **product-led signals**, **usage-based qualification**, or **AI co-pilots in discovery**. **AirDeck CRO RJ Stephens** publicly argued in 2025 that "the days of endless open-ended discovery are over" — fair, though he conceded the **diagnostic spine** still matters.

## 8. Apply It On Monday Morning

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    A[Monday 9am<br/>Pick 1 stalled deal] --> B[Tuesday<br/>Build Pain Chain<br/>frontline to CFO]
    B --> C[Wednesday<br/>Draft Pain Sheet<br/>per top 3 personas]
    C --> D[Thursday<br/>Run 9-Box discovery<br/>with champion]
    D --> E[Friday<br/>Send Power Sponsor Letter<br/>via champion]
    E --> F[Following Monday<br/>Economic buyer meeting<br/>with MAP attached]
```

### The 60-Minute Drill

Open a **closed-lost deal review** in your CRM. Re-build the **Pain Chain** for that lost deal in 15 minutes. In **70% of cases** (per the **Sales Benchmark Index** 2024 win/loss data) the rep never connected pain above the **director level**. That single gap explains the loss. Run this drill every Friday for a quarter and your win rate moves **2-4 points**.

## FAQ

**Is Solution Selling still relevant in 2027?**
The **diagnostic spine** — 9-Box, Pain Chain, Pain Sheet — is still the cleanest framework in print. The **conversational surface** (long open-ended questions, single-threaded champion) is dated. Read the book, steal the tools, then layer **MEDDPICC qualification** and **multi-thread maps** on top.

**Where does it conflict with The Challenger Sale?**
**Matt Dixon**'s Challenger argues buyers don't know their own pain and need to be **taught** with **Commercial Insight**. Bosworth assumes the buyer can be **led to articulate** their pain with the right questions. In practice, modern reps do both: open with insight, validate with 9-Box.

**Solution Selling vs SPIN Selling — which first?**
**Neil Rackham's SPIN** (1988) is shorter, more research-backed, and easier to teach. Read **SPIN** first to internalize **Situation-Problem-Implication-Need-Payoff**, then read **Solution Selling** for the operational artifacts (Pain Sheet, Power Sponsor Letter, MAP).

**Is the 1994 edition or the 2003 New Solution Selling better?**
**Keith Eades**'s 2003 **The New Solution Selling** is the better operational manual — tighter, more checklists, less narrative. The 1994 original is better for **why** the system exists. Most sales orgs hand the 2003 version to new hires.

**My company is PLG — does any of this apply?**
The **9-Box** maps cleanly onto **PQL conversion calls**. The PQL has **revealed pain** (their usage data shows the problem). You skip the latent-pain box and start at **Explore Impact**. Pain Chain still applies — the user who signed up rarely owns the budget.

## Bottom Line

**Solution Selling** is a **1990s book with 2030s bones**. The 9-Box Vision Processing Model, the Pain Chain, and the Pain Sheet are still the most teachable artifacts in B2B selling, which is why **Force Management**, **Winning by Design**, **MEDDPICC**, and **Command of the Message** all trace lineage back to it. Pick it up when you're building a **sales playbook from scratch**, when your team's discovery sounds like a **product demo with question marks**, or when your **forecast accuracy** is being killed by reps who cannot articulate buyer pain above the manager level. Skip it if you're looking for **modern multi-threading**, **PLG motion design**, or **AI-augmented discovery** — for those, read **Gap Selling** (Keenan, 2018) and **The JOLT Effect** (Dixon, 2022) alongside it.

## Sources

- Michael T. Bosworth, **Solution Selling: Creating Buyers in Difficult Selling Markets**, McGraw-Hill, 1994 — [Amazon page (ISBN 0786303158)](https://www.amazon.com/Solution-Selling-Creating-Difficult-Markets/dp/0786303158)
- **Goodreads** community reviews and ratings of Solution Selling — [goodreads.com/book/show/514592](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/514592.Solution_Selling)
- **Internet Archive** full-text scan of the 1994 first edition — [archive.org/details/solutionsellingc00bosw](https://archive.org/details/solutionsellingc00bosw)
- **getAbstract** structured summary of Solution Selling — [getabstract.com/en/summary/solution-selling/4696](https://www.getabstract.com/en/summary/solution-selling/4696)
- **Gong** blog, "A Complete Guide to the Solution Selling Methodology" — [gong.io/blog/solution-selling](https://www.gong.io/blog/solution-selling)
- **Pipedrive** blog, "Solution Selling: The Comprehensive Guide" — [pipedrive.com/en/blog/solution-selling](https://www.pipedrive.com/en/blog/solution-selling)
- **MEDDICC** official methodology guide on pain qualification — [meddicc.com/meddpicc-sales-methodology-and-process](https://meddicc.com/meddpicc-sales-methodology-and-process)
- **HAVE Trust Selling** sales-book review of Solution Selling — [havetrustselling.com/sales-book-reviews/solution-selling](https://havetrustselling.com/sales-book-reviews/solution-selling/)
- **Built In** explainer on Solution Selling in modern SaaS — [builtin.com/articles/solution-selling](https://builtin.com/articles/solution-selling)
- **Keith Eades**, The New Solution Selling, McGraw-Hill, 2003 (referenced as the operational update) — publisher page via McGraw-Hill Education

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Gross Profit CalculatorModel margin per deal, per rep, per territory

Related in the library